llm-ingestion-okf/README.md
Kjell Tore Guttormsen bd522a1f61 docs(readme): show the test command, and stop calling a shipped phase planned
Two defects on the published surface, both measured this session rather than
assumed.

org-ops' census 07 found no test command inside a fenced block in our README,
and the finding is true: the string "pytest" did not appear in the file at all.
A stranger could install the library but could not confirm it works. The block
now names the command, and says the thing the command alone would not: it needs
a clone, because the wheel packages only src/llm_ingestion_okf and tests/ lives
at the repository root. The 589-test count and the run date are measured, not
carried over.

Running org-ops' own A5 criterion ("no claim on the surface is untrue") against
ourselves found the second one. The status paragraph said phases 1 and 2 are
implemented and phases 3-4 are planned, while profiles.py:701 has shipped
STRICT_V1 since phase 3 landed. The Roadmap section and the profile table were
already consistent with phase 3 being done, so the stale claim sat alone in the
one paragraph a reader meets first.

Fixing only the first would have repeated the most expensive finding we have
recorded: writing a trap down is not running it.

Verified with the instrument org-ops supplied, against this branch:
  awk '/^```/{f=!f; next} f' README.md \
    | grep -icE 'npm (run )?test|node --test|pytest|vitest|jest|make test|bats'
  -> 1 (was 0)

Docs only. No release, no tag, no pin movement: the guard pin and the paired
install tags are untouched, and the open release decision stays open.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UgzRG5EGPk72Mj4JN4uhQS
2026-08-13 21:09:16 +02:00

260 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# llm-ingestion-okf
Shared OKF (Open Knowledge Format) ingestion library: spec-based connectors, bundle inbox, and external-bundle import. Security delegated to llm-ingestion-guard.
Status: phases 13 are implemented. Phase 1 (spec-based ingestion) covers
manifest validation, the `file`/`sql`/`http` connectors, deterministic
materialization, index generation, and the golden fixture suite under
`examples/`. Phase 2 adds the bundle inbox (`process_inbox`) and
external-bundle import (`import_bundle`), both against an **injected** persist
gate, with `llm_ingestion_okf.guard_adapter` wiring that gate to the real
guard (see below). Phase 3 makes the bundle contract configurable, so types,
layers, frontmatter sets, index shape, and reserved-file policy are carried by
a profile rather than by constants (see [Upstream OKF
versions](#upstream-okf-versions)). One phase-2 item is deliberately
outstanding: binary extraction (`pdf`/`docx`/`xlsx` behind the `[extract]`
extra) is unimplemented, so those types are rejected fail-fast. Phase 4 (the
Node half) is planned (see `docs/plan/`).
## Install
Python 3.10+. Neither this package nor the guard it depends on is on a package
index yet, so **with pip, install the guard first** — otherwise installing this
package fails with `No matching distribution found for llm-ingestion-guard`:
```
pip install "llm-ingestion-guard @ git+https://git.fromaitochitta.com/open/llm-ingestion-pipeline-security.git@v0.2.0"
pip install "llm-ingestion-okf @ git+https://git.fromaitochitta.com/open/llm-ingestion-okf.git@v0.4.0"
```
With uv, one command is enough — `uv pip install "llm-ingestion-okf @ git+…@v0.4.0"`
resolves the guard on its own, because uv reads the `[tool.uv.sources]` entry
in the `pyproject.toml` **of the tag it is installing**, and `v0.4.0` points
that entry at the guard tag above. Both paths were measured on 2026-07-25,
against this exact pair of tags.
The guard tag is paired to the okf tag, not to this branch: `v0.4.0` declares
`llm-ingestion-guard>=0.2,<0.3`, which `v0.2.0` satisfies and later guard tags
do not. `main` has since moved its own pin to `>=0.3,<0.4` (see
[Requirements](#requirements)); that pin reaches you in the next stable tag,
not in the commands above. Reading a pin off this branch and installing it
against `v0.4.0` is the one combination that fails.
`v0.4.0` is the current stable tag. `v0.5.0a2` is a pre-release for the named
OKF v0.2 pilot set only; pin it only if you are one of them (see
[Upstream OKF versions](#upstream-okf-versions)).
## Planned scope (v1)
The library provides three entry points for getting content into an OKF
bundle:
1. **Spec-based ingestion.** An implementation of the normative ingest
specification owned by `portfolio-optimiser-commons`: manifest →
`file`/`sql`/`http` connector → deterministic materialization of
`ingest-{id}.md` concept files → index generation. Zero model calls in the
run path; output is reproducible byte-for-byte against golden fixtures.
2. **Bundle inbox.** A drop directory where common file types are converted
to OKF concept files. All file-type→text extraction lives in this library:
`md`, `txt`, `csv`, `json`, and `html` are handled by the stdlib core;
`pdf`, `docx`, and `xlsx` require the optional `[extract]` extra and are
rejected fail-fast without it. Extracted text passes the security gate
before anything is persisted.
3. **External bundle import.** Import and merge of third-party OKF bundles:
each concept is assessed via the security gate, and only concepts that
pass are merged, materialized, and linked into the index.
## Boundary: security is delegated
Security is owned by the sibling package
[`llm-ingestion-guard`](https://git.fromaitochitta.com/open/llm-ingestion-pipeline-security)
(pinned `>=0.3,<0.4`). The division is strict:
- **guard** answers "is this content safe to persist?" — scan, sanitize,
quarantine, fail-secure, provenance stamping.
- **this library** does the plumbing — connect a source, materialize a
deterministic OKF bundle, generate the index.
No security functionality is reimplemented here.
### What is gated today: read this before trusting a door
- **Door A (`materialize_bundle`) is ungated.** It calls nothing before
writing to disk and writes what it is given. A caller materializing
untrusted content is responsible for gating it.
- **Doors B and C (`process_inbox`, `import_bundle`) gate through an adapter
you pass in.** Each takes a `gate` argument; the flow hands it the content
and obeys the verdict, refusing to persist anything that does not clear the
guard's non-blocking floor — including a disposition it does not recognise,
and (at Door C) a concept the gate returned no verdict for. What it cannot
do is check that your adapter is a real guard: a permissive stub approves
everything, and the flow will believe it.
`llm_ingestion_okf.guard_adapter` is the adapter over the real guard, and the
only module here that imports it — importing the package itself does not:
```python
from llm_ingestion_okf import process_inbox
from llm_ingestion_okf.guard_adapter import inbox_gate
result = process_inbox(inbox_dir, bundle_dir, "2026-07-25T12:00:00Z",
okf_type="reference", gate=inbox_gate)
```
Two properties of that adapter are worth knowing before you rely on it.
It screens the **exact bytes it persists** — the guard's `prepare_input`
bookend prepares text for a model call, which this library never makes, so
only `screen_output` is used and the screened string is the written string.
And it **refuses rather than repairs**: a file carrying an invisible
zero-width or bidi character is rejected, not silently stripped and written.
Door B screens under the untrusted-upload policy, so any finding at all is
held back rather than persisted.
This section is stated plainly because earlier wording ("calls the guard at
every persist gate") described the intended end state in the present tense,
and a consumer reasonably read it as safe-by-default.
## Roadmap
The library is built in four phases so that every known OKF surface in the
ecosystem is eventually covered. Each phase has a detailed plan with
verification criteria:
1. Spec-based ingestion (Python) with byte-exact golden fixtures —
[plan](docs/plan/phase-1-door-a.md).
2. Bundle inbox and external-bundle import (Python), guard-gated —
[plan](docs/plan/phase-2-doors-b-c.md).
3. Configurable bundle contract (types, layers, frontmatter sets, index
shape, and reserved-file policy as configuration), enabling stricter
bundle profiles such as `strict-v1`
[plan](docs/plan/phase-3-configurable-contract.md).
4. A `node/` half: a zero-dependency Node/ESM package (importable and
CLI-invokable, vendored per consumer) providing bundle checking, index
generation, inbox processing, and document conversion for the OKF
second-brain plugin ecosystem. The Python and Node halves share the OKF
contract and fixture suite, not code —
[plan](docs/plan/phase-4-node-half.md).
## Upstream OKF versions
The library targets the current latest version of Google's OKF. Support is
**additive** — a new upstream version arrives as a new profile, never as a
migration of an existing one — so an *upstream* release does not change the
bytes an existing profile emits.
That guarantee is about upstream, and one profile tracks a second contract as
well. `DEFAULT` states the ingest-spec owned by `portfolio-optimiser-commons`,
so when they change that spec, `DEFAULT` follows them. It happened on
2026-08-09: `generated` moved from `true` to
`{ by: process:okf-ingest, at: <ingested_at> }`, one changed line per generated
file. Upgrading across it costs a re-run and nothing more — a profile still
recognises bundles stamped by earlier versions, so re-running writes in place
instead of refusing. `DEFAULT` remains OKF v0.1 on every axis upstream owns.
| Profile | Contract | Status |
|---|---|---|
| `DEFAULT` | commons' ingest-spec layer (OKF v0.1 semantics) | stable |
| `STRICT_V1` | a consumer's ratified v0.1 contract | stable |
| `OKF_V0_2` | OKF v0.2 | **provisional**, pre-release only |
| `OKF_LATEST` | alias for the latest version supported as *stable* | currently `DEFAULT` |
`OKF_V0_2` ships first as a pre-release to a named pilot set and may change on
their feedback without a deprecation cycle. Pin the versioned constant rather
than `OKF_LATEST` unless you have explicitly opted into tracking; `OKF_LATEST`
moves at general availability, which is a deliberate release event rather than
a side effect of an upgrade.
Selecting a profile is keyword-only, so existing call sites are unaffected:
```python
materialize_bundle(manifest, bundle_dir, ingested_at, profile=OKF_V0_2)
```
A bundle may declare the version it targets. OKF v0.2 §12 makes this a MAY, and
puts the declaration in the bundle-root `index.md`'s frontmatter block. The
profile names the key; the **caller supplies the value**, because that value
tracks the upstream version and is not this library's to decide:
```python
materialize_bundle(
manifest, bundle_dir, ingested_at,
profile=OKF_V0_2,
root_frontmatter_values={"okf_version": "0.2"},
)
```
Omit the argument and no frontmatter block is written. Offering a key the
profile does not name is refused before anything is written to disk.
### Attested computations (v0.2 §10)
`OKF_V0_2` supports the `Attested Computation` type as a **format**: its five
contract fields — `runtime`, `parameters`, `computation`, `executor`,
`attester` — are emitted in canonical position, judged, and round-tripped.
`runtime` is required for that type and for no other, which the profile
expresses through `FrontmatterSchema.required_by_type`; a type the mapping does
not name carries no extra requirement, because §14 forbids a consumer to reject
on an unknown `type`.
Nothing here executes a computation or checks an attestation. Upstream defers
the receipt and verdict wire formats, so there is no contract to implement, and
the question an attestation answers — was this value produced the sanctioned
way — is not this library's. It re-enters scope when upstream specifies the
protocol.
On the import side, a third-party concept may name an `executor` or `attester`
resource pointing at executable code. Door C imports the **pointer** and never
the code — it writes concepts verbatim and skips every non-`.md` file — so such
a reference may not resolve, or may resolve to a file the destination tree
already holds under that path. Each one is reported in
`ImportResult.unverified_references`; the concept still merges, because §14
forbids rejecting a bundle over a broken cross-link while §10.5 asks a consumer
to surface rather than silently drop. The report names the pointer key, not the
resource it points at: recovering the resource needs the structured reader.
One limit worth knowing before you write such a concept: §10.2 presents
`executor` and `attester` as nested block mappings, and this library's
frontmatter parser is line-oriented. It reads inline **flow** mappings
(`executor: { resource: …, receipt: [ … ] }`) as opaque values that round-trip
unchanged, but it cannot read the block form — two block mappings that both
carry a `resource` collapse into one namespace and the first is lost. Write the
flow form; both are valid YAML, and a real YAML consumer recovers the same
structure from either.
## Non-goals
- Verdict/feedback machinery from the method specification (stays in the
consuming repositories).
- Embedding- or retrieval-layer functionality.
- Security functionality, in either runtime — that is always
`llm-ingestion-guard`'s domain.
## Requirements
Python 3.10+, and exactly one runtime dependency — the security boundary,
`llm-ingestion-guard>=0.3,<0.4`. Everything else is stdlib. The commands are
under [Install](#install); what follows is why they look the way they do.
From a checkout, the test suite runs with:
```
.venv/bin/python -m pytest
```
The suite is the verification surface for everything above: 589 tests, run on
2026-08-13 against this branch. It is not shipped in an installed
distribution — `tests/` lives at the repository root, so this command needs a
clone rather than a `pip install`.
A git URL is a PEP 508 direct reference and pins one exact tag, so it is an
install-time *channel*, not the pin: the range above stays the declared
dependency — a wheel built from this branch carries `Requires-Dist:
llm-ingestion-guard<0.4,>=0.3`, measured 2026-08-10 — and resolves normally
once the package index exists. A wheel built from a *tag* carries that tag's
range instead, which is why the install commands pair tag with tag. The optional `[extract]` extra (pdf/docx/xlsx parsers) is not
populated yet. The planned Node half targets Node/ESM with zero npm
dependencies.
## License
MIT — see [LICENSE](LICENSE).