llm-ingestion-okf/CLAUDE.md
Kjell Tore Guttormsen c3b645bccf fix(consume): the compound-word miss is a degenerate signal's tie-break, behind a flag
The consumer's question about `vann- og frostsikring` in a subsea tunnel
delivered 0 of the 16 concepts covering it, best of them at fused rank 14.
Reproduced with the denominator, then decomposed per signal before anything
was built.

It is not a matcher miss. `normalise("vann- og frostsikring")` already returns
`('vann', 'frostsikring')` on HEAD, the prefix rule already bridges the
inflections, and the best covering concept already answers 7 of 7 question
tokens -- more than any delivered one. A tokeniser rule had nothing to widen.

It is the fusion, but not a weight. RRF ranks every concept in every signal,
including a signal that scored them all the same, and the declared
`(-score, concept_id)` tie-break then orders that group by id. On N500 the
document prior has TWO distinct values over 270 concepts, so the third signal
contributed alphabetical UUID order spread from 1/61 to 1/329 -- enough to put
a concept leading the body signal behind concepts sharing only `tunnel` and
`vann`.

`--tie-shared-rank` lets concepts a signal scores equally share that group's
first rank. The miss closes: best covering 14 -> 3, 2 of 16 delivered. OFF BY
DEFAULT, by the order's own rule: the three requirement lookups hold at rank 1
and the K2 digest holds, but hit@8 over the six published questions falls 5 of
6 to 4 of 6. Decomposed rather than guessed -- K2's prior is coarse (6 values
over 39 documents) rather than degenerate, and one gold sat early in its tie
group. That benefit was never a measurement, but it is a published row.

`--withheld-titles` gives each withheld entry the concept's title, so a reader
can see WHAT was withheld without reading the bundle. 11 lines of code; the
bytes are why it is off. It grows an N500 payload 37.9 % and takes the
629-concept K2 bundle's BOOKKEEPING to 122 704 B -- past the 120 000-byte limit
itself -- which would falsify the breaking point published in the tracked
`skills/okf-consume/SKILL.md` on the day it shipped.

Defaults measured, not asserted: six payload digests built from a frozen
`ff79cfa` (`git archive`, `__file__` checked) and from this tree with both
flags omitted are 6 of 6 identical, and `okf_skill.py` output is identical
apart from the paths each copy writes about itself. Contract checker exit 0 on
eight payloads, both values.

One known-positive did not reproduce and is reported rather than matched: the
order's S7 literal `2ae46f68`/169 573 B is stale by three excerpt-form commits;
HEAD measures `c759a657`/171 614 B.

Suite 1388 -> 1397. Report: docs/2026-09-08-rangeringsbom-sammensatte-ord.md

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-08 18:53:18 +02:00

403 lines
25 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# llm-ingestion-okf
## Context
Shared OKF (Open Knowledge Format) ingestion library. Three entry doors,
one boundary rule:
- **Door A — spec-based ingestion:** implements the normative
`ingest-spec.md` owned by `portfolio-optimiser-commons` (manifest →
`file`/`sql`/`http` connector → deterministic materialization of
`ingest-{id}.md` → index generation; zero model calls). This repo
IMPLEMENTS the spec; commons keeps authorship. Spec changes the library
needs go via commons, never edited locally. The library ships the §11
golden fixtures (byte-exact) for the three door-A source types
(`ingest-golden-{file,sql,http}/`, shipped in `9dd86b1`).
- **Door B — bundle inbox:** converts dropped files to OKF concepts. The drop
directory is walked RECURSIVELY, sorted by relative path, and a concept's
`source_file` is that relative path (`/`-separated) while its NAME still
comes from the basename — so a nested duplicate hits the §3 collision
refusal rather than vanishing. Dot-directories and a bundle nested inside
the inbox are skipped with a code, never silently, because recursion makes
the door's own output reachable as its own input (operator 2026-09-06; the
flat listing was not a boundary, it was an absence with no denominator). All
file-type→text extraction lives HERE (the guard is text-only). v1 core:
`md`, `txt`, `csv`, `json`, `html` (stdlib). `pdf`/`docx`/`xlsx` only via
the optional `[extract]` extra; without it those types are rejected
fail-fast. The extra ships `pdfplumber` for `pdf` (chosen on ONE measured
property: it keeps a requirement table's label and value on the same line
where three alternatives do not); `docx`/`xlsx` still ship no parser.
Structured table recovery is **out of scope** — two independent parsers
return the same wrong shape, so the breakage is document geometry, not a
library choice. PDFs enter as prose, and drawn content (figures) does not
survive extraction at all, which every `pdf` extraction warns about.
Under the `STRUCTURED_V1` profile Door B additionally DERIVES structure —
title (leading heading → `title` key → `path.stem`), document number,
hierarchy, and cross-references — writes it into the concept frontmatter, and
projects it into a faceted index entry. Every inferred field is named in a
`derived` list; an unmarked heuristic is worse than none.
Under the SEGMENTED v0.2 profile a concept additionally POINTS BACK at the
original: `sources: [{ resource, title }]` in SPEC §5.1's form (`resource` is
the inbox-relative path), plus a locator per format — `source_pages`,
`source_sheet`+`source_rows`, else `source_lines`. The locator keys are OURS
and must stay top-level: §5.1 has no field for a place within a resource, and
the pinned guard rejects every route to putting one inside a `sources` entry
(non-allowlisted key, nested flow list, quoted scalar), so a locator in the
entry would emit bundles Door C could never read back. The unit table is
built AT EXTRACTION — a page number cannot be recovered from joined text —
and `source_offset` stays. `source_lines` indexes the EXTRACTED text, never
the original's paragraphs: measured, docx `<w:p>` counts and converted-line
counts do not agree on a single one of five documents. Record:
`docs/2026-09-08-proveniens-k2.md`. The index is a
PROJECTION recomputed from the whole bundle each round, which is what makes
rebuild-from-scratch equal an incremental update byte for byte. `DEFAULT` is
untouched and byte-identical. Record: `docs/plan/structure-derivation.md`.
- **Door C — external bundle import:** third-party OKF bundles are assessed
per concept via the guard's `okf.import_bundle`; only concepts clearing the
guard's non-blocking floor are merged/indexed here. Two invariants, both
load-bearing: a merged concept is written **verbatim** (this library's
line-oriented frontmatter parser cannot round-trip the block lists the
guard's parser accepts, so stamping an external concept would destroy sender
data and persist bytes the guard never screened), and ownership is therefore
proven by **content identity** — an occupied target name is re-used only
when the bytes there are already identical, never overwritten otherwise.
**Boundary rule (non-negotiable, zero overlap):** `llm-ingestion-guard`
(pinned `>=1.2,<2.0`) answers "is this content safe to persist?" —
scan/sanitize/quarantine/fail-secure/provenance-stamp. This library is
plumbing: connect source → materialize deterministic OKF bundle → generate
index. Never reimplement security; call the guard at persist gates
(`prepare_input`/`screen_output`, `okf.import_bundle`). When in doubt which
side of the boundary something belongs on: ask the operator.
**Implementation baseline:** the stricter behaviors from
`portfolio-optimiser` (streaming row caps, utf-8-sig, in-memory staging with
pre-mutation collision gate, validated `ingested_at`, typed `IngestError`)
are the library baseline. First consumer: `portfolio-optimiser-claude`.
### Roadmap (phases 13 shipped; what follows is demand-driven)
1. **Phase 1 — Door A (Python).** ingest-spec implementation + the §11
golden fixtures. Consumers: `portfolio-optimiser-claude` first, then
`portfolio-optimiser`.
2. **Phase 2 — Doors B/C (Python).** Bundle inbox and external-bundle
import, guard-gated.
3. **Phase 3 — Configurable bundle contract.** Types, layers, frontmatter
sets, index shape, and reserved-file policy become config instead of
constants; proving consumer is `claude-code-llm-wiki` (`strict-v1`
profile). Two consumers hold opposite postures on whether an index is
authored or directory-derived, so neither is a library invariant and
nothing here enumerates a directory unless the profile says derived.
4. **Phase 4 — Node half (`node/`).** Zero-dependency Node/ESM package
(importable *and* CLI-invokable, vendorable per plugin — matching the
marketplace precedent) for the second-brain world: bundle check, index
generation, inbox split/frontmatter/write, and doc conversion
(docx/pdf/eml/html → md). Covers okr, linkedin-studio, ms-ai-architect,
and the marketplace catalog.
5. **Phase 5 — MCP as a way to populate a bundle. NOT COMMITTED; needs-based
(operator 2026-08-02, superseding the 2026-07-27 commitment.)** No MCP work,
and no data-lake or database source types, are undertaken without a stated
need. `docs/plan/mcp-bundle-population.md` stays as a design record, not a
queue. Its open fork — whether we are the MCP **server** (an agent calls our
doors as tools) or an MCP **client** (a manifest source type pulling from
someone else's server) — no longer blocks anything, because nothing waits
behind it. It is a question to answer *if* a need arrives, not before. This
is also why `sql` staying sqlite-only is not a gap: a Postgres driver would
be runtime dependency number two, bought for no asked-for use.
The two halves share the OKF contract and fixture suite, **not code**.
**Standing posture (operator 2026-08-02).** Phases 13 shipped; the library now
runs on what it has. Work is defect fixes, improvements, and features that a
consumer has actually asked for or that measured feedback shows are needed —
not roadmap completion for its own sake. The upstream version policy below is
the one exception, and it is not a counterexample: "always latest" is a promise
already made to consumers, so an upstream release *is* the stated need.
Phase 4 keeps four named consumers with working implementations to lift, so its
need is real but untriggered — it starts when one of them asks, not on a date.
### Upstream version policy (standing, non-negotiable)
**The library always supports the current latest version of Google OKF.** Set by
the operator 2026-07-26. Phases 13 were built against v0.1; v0.2 shipped
2026-07-25, so v0.2 support is committed work — not contingent on a consumer
asking for it. Plan: `docs/plan/okf-v0.2-alignment.md`.
Support is **additive, expressed as a new profile**, never a migration of
existing ones. This is what makes the policy sustainable instead of a recurring
crisis, and it is bounded by three facts that do not yield to it:
- `DEFAULT` states commons' ingest-spec §5 layer — its `generated` shape is
commons' call, raised there, never patched locally. **This fired 2026-08-09:**
commons ratified and executed the O2 form, so `DEFAULT` now stamps
`generated: { by: process:okf-ingest, at: <ingested_at> }` and four goldens
moved with it. It is not a counterexample to "additive, never a migration" —
that rule governs *upstream* versions, and commons' spec is a separate axis
`DEFAULT` tracks by definition. `DEFAULT` stays v0.1 on everything upstream
owns. Ownership recognition is one-way, so the cost to a consumer stays a
re-run: a profile carrying an actor still owns the older literal stamp.
- `STRICT_V1` mirrors the proving consumer's ratified contract — changing another
repo's contract from here violates O2.
- `okf_version`'s *value* belongs to catalog (decision E1).
**Rollout is pilot-first.** A new upstream version reaches a small pilot set on a
pre-release tag and is revised on their feedback before general availability —
consumers testing real data find what fixtures cannot. `OKF_LATEST` means the
latest version supported as *stable*, so flipping that alias is the GA event, not
a merge side effect.
Two invariants fall out: no profile hard-codes an upstream version, and no bundle
declares a version its shape has not earned. The first has a mechanism, not just
an intention: **a profile names a key, a caller owns its value.** `okf_version`
is declared through `materialize_bundle(..., root_frontmatter_values=...)`
because its value tracks the upstream Google version and belongs to catalog
(decision E1) — a constant here would claim a decision we do not own, and would
be the one thing to chase on every upstream release. Where upstream itself defers a
contract — v0.2's attestation receipt and verdict wire formats — the format is
supported and the unspecified runtime is not; it re-enters scope when upstream
specifies it. Because "always latest" decays silently, the release checklist
carries an upstream-version re-check.
**Structured frontmatter values are emitted in YAML *flow* form, never block.**
Both are valid YAML and an upstream reader recovers the same structure from
either, but this library's parser is line-oriented: it round-trips a flow
mapping as an opaque value and cannot read the block form at all — two block
mappings sharing an inner key (§10.2's `executor` and `attester`, both carrying
`resource`) collapse into one namespace and the first is lost silently.
Emitting block would produce bundles we cannot read back. Reading it needs the
structured reader (D1b); until then the constraint binds what we write.
**Every upstream release runs `docs/upstream-okf-upgrade-runbook.md`.** Pin the
commit, enumerate the whole `okf/` tree, **read the shipped example bundles and not
only `SPEC.md`**, classify the diff, measure our exposure and each consumer's, plan
additively, pilot before GA, then inform every OKF-consuming repo. The runbook is
not optional and not a summary of good intentions: each step names the concrete
failure it prevents, and all of them are failures that happened during v0.1 → v0.2.
**This repo is a black box for its consumers.** The target cost of an upstream
release to a consuming repo is **a re-run, nothing more**: support is additive
(a new profile, never a migration), existing profiles stay byte-stable, new public
parameters are keyword-only with defaults so positional call sites stay
source-compatible, and consumer golden fixtures must not churn. The boundary is
stated every time rather than glossed — the library absorbs *shape* changes, not
upstream changes to content a consumer authored (v0.2's `timestamp` and
`# Citations` supersessions). For that class the deliverable is a measured exposure
report per consumer, sent before they ask.
Phase 4 preconditions (coordination, not unilateral moves):
- Lifts okr's reference implementations (`okf-check.mjs`, `okf-index.mjs`,
innboks libs) in agreement with okr and the marketplace catalog; the
catalog remains the convention owner and re-pins its shared gate here.
- linkedin-studio's `ingest/published/` provenance-record grammar stays
plugin-local by design (different lifecycle) — do not normalize it.
- The Node-side persist gate remains security territory: guard-as-contract
(per okr's adoption doc) until a Node guard exists in the security repo.
No security reimplementation here, in either runtime.
### Non-goals (all phases)
- Verdict/feedback machinery (method-spec) — stays in consumer repos.
- Embedding/RAG/retrieval layers.
- Security functionality — always the guard's domain.
## Stack
Python 3.10+. Package `llm_ingestion_okf` (src layout, hatchling).
**Exactly one runtime dependency, ever:** `llm-ingestion-guard>=1.2,<2.0`
(itself zero-dep), landed with the Door B/C persist gates. Everything else is
stdlib, and a packaging test enforces it. Only `guard_adapter.py` imports the
guard; importing the package does not. Install channel until the package
index exists (a direct reference is a channel, not the pin):
`pip install "llm-ingestion-guard @ git+https://git.fromaitochitta.com/open/llm-ingestion-pipeline-security.git@v1.2.0"`.
Binary extraction parsers live behind the `[extract]` extra only — today
`pdfplumber>=0.11.10,<0.12` for `pdf`. Extracted PDF text is pinned to an
exact transitive parser version (`pdfminer.six==20260107`), so widening that
range is a fixture migration, guarded by a frozen literal in
`tests/test_extract.py`; see `tests/fixtures/README.md`.
Phase 4 adds a `node/` half: Node/ESM with zero npm dependencies
(`node:` builtins only), both importable and CLI-invokable, consumed by
vendoring per plugin rather than npm publishing. The halves share contract
and fixtures, never code.
## Conventions
- Type hints everywhere; `mypy --strict` target.
- Determinism is bit-exact: `ingested_at` is an explicit required argument
(no wall-clock defaults); LF-only output; golden fixtures compared
byte-for-byte.
- Filenames and titles are normalized to Unicode NFC before use
(`materialize.reduce_to_id_grammar`, `inbox.process_inbox`): macOS/APFS
hands filenames over in decomposed form, so an `é` arrives as `e` +
combining acute. Without normalizing first, the same visual name (e.g. a
Norwegian slugger title like "linkedin-studio") reduces differently
depending on which form it arrived in, splitting one title into two
generated filenames.
- No model calls anywhere in the run path.
- Credentials only as env-var *references* resolved at runtime; never in
manifests, logs, or frontmatter.
- Network access requires an explicit per-run opt-in flag; refuse fail-fast
otherwise.
- Conventional Commits: `type(scope): description`.
- English for all code, docs, and commit messages (public repo).
## Commands
- Test: `pytest`
- Lint: `ruff check .` + `ruff format --check .`
- Type check: `mypy --strict src/`
- Build a bundle: `okf build <folder> --bundle <dir> --bundle-id <id>
--okf-version <v>` — the installed console script (`[project.scripts]`),
the packaged form of what used to be a shell loop over two `tools/`
scripts. It is orchestration only: the proposer and the corpus harness
live in `llm_ingestion_okf.propose` and `llm_ingestion_okf.corpus`, and
the `tools/` scripts are thin entry points to the same functions so the
published reproduction blocks still run. Path scope for a document's
proposals is its RELATIVE path minus the extension (the door walks
recursively, and two same-named documents in different folders must not
collide); `--ingested-at` and `--proposed-at` default to one shared epoch
constant rather than the clock, because a wall-clock default takes
rebuild-equals-incremental away from anyone who omits them.
**Four segmentation rules are REACHABLE here and all four are OFF by
default** (2026-09-08): `--outline-run N` (Arm D), `--table-grid` (Arm E),
`--unit-fold` (Arm F) and `--keep-table-heading` (D1), each passed to the
proposer unchanged. Until that day the build path called the proposer with no
arm flag at all, so a tender PDF that Arm D splits into nine concepts landed
as one -- a build path a full arm behind the proposer. Exposing them is not
the same decision as moving one: **which arm should ship as the default is
the operator's, and a no-flag build stays byte-identical** (measured by
digest before and after, and by Arm E over all 43 corpus documents). Arm C
(`--max-segment-chars`) stays unexposed: no reference has ever been measured
for its cap. Reports: `docs/2026-09-08-k3-arm-f-mot-enhetsarket.md` and
`docs/2026-09-08-k3-runde2-per-filtype.md`.
- Consume a bundle: `python3 tools/okf_consume.py <bundle> --question "<q>"
[--k N] [--limit N] [--out PATH] [--ref IDENTITY]` — the **pre-pass**
`docs/consumption-contract.md` § 1 defines, and the only reading direction
this library has. It lives in `tools/` for the reason
`okf_contract_check.py` states for itself: outside `src/`, so no consumer's
install surface changes because it exists. Its entry point is
`build_payload(...)` with the CLI a thin `main()`, so lifting it into `src/`
the day a consumer asks for a wheel-installed command is a move, not a
rewrite. Deterministic and offline by construction: no model call, no socket,
no clock, stdlib plus this package only. It **walks the index tree, never a
directory** — § 9.2 forbids enumerating one unless the named profile says the
index is derived, and measured, `entries_match_directory` is `True` for
`STRICT_V1` alone; the walk loses nothing (629 = 629 on the K2 bundle,
controlled in a test against the very method § 9.2 forbids). `--ref` is an
**assertion**, never an override: the emitted identity is always the computed
one, because § 3.3 exists to stop a payload being labelled with an identity
its bytes do not have. Three exit codes: 0 written, 1 refused, 2 did not run.
**Every excerpt carries the concept's `title`**, plus `req_number`, the § 5.1
address `sources`, and **every top-level `source_*` key by PREFIX** — never an
allowlist, because a list names the producers its author thought of and one
bundle locates by `source_element_id` on 269 of 274 concepts. A prefix, never
a substring (`resource_owner` is not a locator). An absent key stays absent
and an undecodable address is named (`sources_unreadable`). `sources` is READ
in both YAML forms because the two real bundles disagree (flow 629/629 on one,
block 270/270 on the other) — reading block is not a licence to write it, the
emission rule is unchanged. Contract § 8 makes `title` a MUST (checker code
`excerpt_unnamed`) and the rest SHOULD, because they are conditional on the
producer. The measurement behind it: rank 1 of 8 on 3 of 3 bundles, correct
answer on 1 of 3.
- Connect a bundle to Claude Code: `python3 tools/okf_skill.py <bundle> --out
<dir>` instantiates `skills/okf-consume-template/` for THAT bundle — its id,
ref, concept count, conditional-field denominators, whole-bundle cost and
breaking point, all measured, plus a reference payload the checker accepts.
In `tools/` for the reason the other two are, and because a wheel-installed
`okf skill` would emit a command pointing at a file the wheel does not carry.
The form was chosen on a measurement: the contract checker passes the
UNFILLED template and passes a skill built for another bundle, so it cannot
tell the two apart — the choice rests on § 5/§ 6.4/§ 7.6 being per-bundle
numbers a generic skill can only leave as holes or state falsely.
The first instantiated consumption skill is `skills/okf-consume/`; the
measurement behind it, including the control that FAILED, is
`docs/2026-09-07-okf-konsumskill-maaling.md`. **The ranking is this
repository's own choice** — the contract binds a payload, not a retrieval
algorithm (§ 10) — and it has FOUR optional widenings, all **off by default**
and all keeping the default payload byte-identical. `--cost-vocabulary`: a
declared cost/price/quantity vocabulary family that bridges a question and a
document naming money with different words, gated on the QUESTION carrying
such a term, so a question without one is byte-identical either way. It moves
a measured case from candidate rank 249 to 10 and does **not** deliver it —
the budget is a second, independent lock. Measured, with two rules falsified
before building and the `k`-sweep that showed a higher `k` can EVICT a gold
concept, in `docs/2026-09-08-blindsone-below-k-k2.md`.
`--reserve-top-rank` is that second lock: the pack is an exact knapsack over a
SUM, so it has no opinion about rank and out-sums a top-ranked excerpt costing
a large share of the budget. The flag gives rank one its bytes first, AFTER
the `over_budget_alone` pre-exclusion and never before, and declares
`budget.reserved` in the payload. It fixes the eviction and does **not** close
the mandate-shaped blind spot (that concept ranks 10, not 1); the budget stays
the caller's decision, because deriving a limit from the corpus was measured
and falsified — two defensible derivations, 49x apart, one of them breaking
the known-positive. `docs/2026-09-08-blindsone-laas2-budsjett-k2.md`.
`--rarity-weight` is the third: each lexical hit weighs `log(N/df)` over the
bundle's own concepts instead of 1, so an identifier is not worth what a
common verb is worth. It enters the RANKING and never the GATE — `lexical`
stays a count, because a word every concept carries weighs exactly 0 and a
weighted gate is what `54a0bc2` falsified. Off by default BY MEASUREMENT: it
delivers one of three requirement lookups and takes a priced sheet from
candidate rank 10 to 2, leaves one gold unmoved and costs another seven rank
positions. Two limits are decomposed rather than guessed, and both are
someone else's mechanism: `MIN_SHARED_PREFIX = 4` makes a unique identifier
read as 135-of-446 common, and RRF consumes RANKS, so no weighting inside a
signal can move a gold that already leads it.
`docs/2026-09-08-sjeldenhetsvekt.md`.
`--tie-shared-rank` is the fourth, and it is a correction to the TIE-BREAK
rather than a weight: RRF ranks every concept in every signal, including a
signal that scored them all the same, and the declared `(-score, concept_id)`
tie-break then orders that group by id. Measured on N500, whose document
prior has **two** distinct values over 270 concepts, that signal contributed
alphabetical UUID order and put a concept answering 7 of 7 question tokens at
fused rank 14 — outside the cut — behind concepts sharing only `tunnel` and
`vann`. Under shared ranks it is rank 3 and 2 of the 16 covering concepts are
delivered. Off by default BY MEASUREMENT: the three requirement lookups hold
at rank 1 and the K2 digest holds, but hit@8 over the six published questions
falls 5 of 6 to 4 of 6, because K2's prior is coarse rather than degenerate
(6 values over 39 documents) and one gold sat early in its tie group — a
benefit that was never a measurement, but a published row all the same.
`docs/2026-09-08-rangeringsbom-sammensatte-ord.md`.
A FIFTH flag is not a ranking widening and is listed apart: `--withheld-titles`
gives each `withheld` entry the concept's `title`, so a reader can see WHAT
was withheld without reading the bundle (§ 2.2 forbids going to look). The
code is 11 lines; the bytes are the reason it is off. Measured, it grows an
N500 payload 37.9 % and takes the 629-concept K2 bundle's BOOKKEEPING to
122 704 B — past the 120 000-byte limit itself — which would make the
breaking point published in the tracked `skills/okf-consume/SKILL.md`
("~75 KB at 629 concepts … at roughly 8 000 concepts") false on the day it
shipped.
## Workflow
- TDD: no production code without a failing test first.
- This repo is published PUBLICLY (`open/` namespace on Forgejo). `STATE.md`
and `docs/oppstartsprompt.md` are LOCAL-ONLY (gitignored) — never commit
session state or internal briefs. No secrets, sober English prose, no
marketing language.
- **Consumer content stays at form level in public files.** Some consumers we
read are private (`claude-code-llm-wiki` is, pending an Anthropic ToS
assessment). Key names, counts, gate names, profile fields and contract shapes
are publishable; page bodies, full title or path lists from a consumer's
bundle, and Anthropic-derived prose are not. Findings about a private
consumer's data go back to them through coord, never as a file here. This
costs nothing — every question this library asks of a consumer is about shapes
and key sets — and it is not reversible once pushed.
- After `git commit`: push to Forgejo (`git push origin`) immediately.
Never GitHub.
## Communication patterns
### Linking to local files
When pointing to local files in responses, always use markdown link syntax
with a descriptive name:
- Use `[Human-friendly name](file:///absolute/path)` — never bare
`file:///...` URLs or autolinks `<file://...>`.
- Always use absolute paths. Never `~/` or relative paths.
- For multiple files, render as a bullet list of named markdown links.
Why: bare `file://` URLs only render the first as clickable across multiple
lines. Named markdown links make each entry independently clickable and look
cleaner.