llm-ingestion-okf/README.md

# llm-ingestion-okf

Shared ingestion library for OKF (Open Knowledge Format) bundles.

Status: phases 1 and 2 are implemented. Phase 1 (spec-based ingestion) covers
manifest validation, the `file`/`sql`/`http` connectors, deterministic
materialization, index generation, and the golden fixture suite under
`examples/`. Phase 2 adds the bundle inbox (`process_inbox`) and
external-bundle import (`import_bundle`), both against an **injected** persist
gate, with `llm_ingestion_okf.guard_adapter` wiring that gate to the real
guard (see below). One phase-2 item is deliberately outstanding: binary
extraction (`pdf`/`docx`/`xlsx` behind the `[extract]` extra) is unimplemented,
so those types are rejected fail-fast. Phases 3–4 are planned (see
`docs/plan/`).

## Planned scope (v1)

The library provides three entry points for getting content into an OKF
bundle:

1. **Spec-based ingestion.** An implementation of the normative ingest
   specification owned by `portfolio-optimiser-commons`: manifest →
   `file`/`sql`/`http` connector → deterministic materialization of
   `ingest-{id}.md` concept files → index generation. Zero model calls in the
   run path; output is reproducible byte-for-byte against golden fixtures.
2. **Bundle inbox.** A drop directory where common file types are converted
   to OKF concept files. All file-type→text extraction lives in this library:
   `md`, `txt`, `csv`, `json`, and `html` are handled by the stdlib core;
   `pdf`, `docx`, and `xlsx` require the optional `[extract]` extra and are
   rejected fail-fast without it. Extracted text passes the security gate
   before anything is persisted.
3. **External bundle import.** Import and merge of third-party OKF bundles:
   each concept is assessed via the security gate, and only concepts that
   pass are merged, materialized, and linked into the index.

## Boundary: security is delegated

Security is owned by the sibling package
[`llm-ingestion-guard`](https://git.fromaitochitta.com/open/llm-ingestion-pipeline-security)
(pinned `>=0.2,<0.3`). The division is strict:

- **guard** answers "is this content safe to persist?" — scan, sanitize,
  quarantine, fail-secure, provenance stamping.
- **this library** does the plumbing — connect a source, materialize a
  deterministic OKF bundle, generate the index.

No security functionality is reimplemented here.

### What is gated today: read this before trusting a door

- **Door A (`materialize_bundle`) is ungated.** It calls nothing before
  writing to disk and writes what it is given. A caller materializing
  untrusted content is responsible for gating it.
- **Doors B and C (`process_inbox`, `import_bundle`) gate through an adapter
  you pass in.** Each takes a `gate` argument; the flow hands it the content
  and obeys the verdict, refusing to persist anything that does not clear the
  guard's non-blocking floor — including a disposition it does not recognise,
  and (at Door C) a concept the gate returned no verdict for. What it cannot
  do is check that your adapter is a real guard: a permissive stub approves
  everything, and the flow will believe it.

`llm_ingestion_okf.guard_adapter` is the adapter over the real guard, and the
only module here that imports it — importing the package itself does not:

```python
from llm_ingestion_okf import process_inbox
from llm_ingestion_okf.guard_adapter import inbox_gate

result = process_inbox(inbox_dir, bundle_dir, "2026-07-25T12:00:00Z",
                       okf_type="reference", gate=inbox_gate)
```

Two properties of that adapter are worth knowing before you rely on it.
It screens the **exact bytes it persists** — the guard's `prepare_input`
bookend prepares text for a model call, which this library never makes, so
only `screen_output` is used and the screened string is the written string.
And it **refuses rather than repairs**: a file carrying an invisible
zero-width or bidi character is rejected, not silently stripped and written.
Door B screens under the untrusted-upload policy, so any finding at all is
held back rather than persisted.

This section is stated plainly because earlier wording ("calls the guard at
every persist gate") described the intended end state in the present tense,
and a consumer reasonably read it as safe-by-default.

## Roadmap

The library is built in four phases so that every known OKF surface in the
ecosystem is eventually covered. Each phase has a detailed plan with
verification criteria:

1. Spec-based ingestion (Python) with byte-exact golden fixtures —
   [plan](docs/plan/phase-1-door-a.md).
2. Bundle inbox and external-bundle import (Python), guard-gated —
   [plan](docs/plan/phase-2-doors-b-c.md).
3. Configurable bundle contract (types, layers, frontmatter sets, index
   shape, and reserved-file policy as configuration), enabling stricter
   bundle profiles such as `strict-v1` —
   [plan](docs/plan/phase-3-configurable-contract.md).
4. A `node/` half: a zero-dependency Node/ESM package (importable and
   CLI-invokable, vendored per consumer) providing bundle checking, index
   generation, inbox processing, and document conversion for the OKF
   second-brain plugin ecosystem. The Python and Node halves share the OKF
   contract and fixture suite, not code —
   [plan](docs/plan/phase-4-node-half.md).

## Upstream OKF versions

The library targets the current latest version of Google's OKF. Support is
**additive** — a new upstream version arrives as a new profile, never as a
migration of an existing one — so upgrading the library does not change the
bytes an existing profile emits.

| Profile | Contract | Status |
|---|---|---|
| `DEFAULT` | commons' ingest-spec §5 layer (OKF v0.1 semantics) | stable |
| `STRICT_V1` | a consumer's ratified v0.1 contract | stable |
| `OKF_V0_2` | OKF v0.2 | **provisional**, pre-release only |
| `OKF_LATEST` | alias for the latest version supported as *stable* | currently `DEFAULT` |

`OKF_V0_2` ships first as a pre-release to a named pilot set and may change on
their feedback without a deprecation cycle. Pin the versioned constant rather
than `OKF_LATEST` unless you have explicitly opted into tracking; `OKF_LATEST`
moves at general availability, which is a deliberate release event rather than
a side effect of an upgrade.

Selecting a profile is keyword-only, so existing call sites are unaffected:

```python
materialize_bundle(manifest, bundle_dir, ingested_at, profile=OKF_V0_2)
```

A bundle may declare the version it targets. OKF v0.2 §12 makes this a MAY, and
puts the declaration in the bundle-root `index.md`'s frontmatter block. The
profile names the key; the **caller supplies the value**, because that value
tracks the upstream version and is not this library's to decide:

```python
materialize_bundle(
    manifest, bundle_dir, ingested_at,
    profile=OKF_V0_2,
    root_frontmatter_values={"okf_version": "0.2"},
)
```

Omit the argument and no frontmatter block is written. Offering a key the
profile does not name is refused before anything is written to disk.

### Attested computations (v0.2 §10)

`OKF_V0_2` supports the `Attested Computation` type as a **format**: its five
contract fields — `runtime`, `parameters`, `computation`, `executor`,
`attester` — are emitted in canonical position, judged, and round-tripped.
`runtime` is required for that type and for no other, which the profile
expresses through `FrontmatterSchema.required_by_type`; a type the mapping does
not name carries no extra requirement, because §14 forbids a consumer to reject
on an unknown `type`.

Nothing here executes a computation or checks an attestation. Upstream defers
the receipt and verdict wire formats, so there is no contract to implement, and
the question an attestation answers — was this value produced the sanctioned
way — is not this library's. It re-enters scope when upstream specifies the
protocol.

One limit worth knowing before you write such a concept: §10.2 presents
`executor` and `attester` as nested block mappings, and this library's
frontmatter parser is line-oriented. It reads inline **flow** mappings
(`executor: { resource: …, receipt: [ … ] }`) as opaque values that round-trip
unchanged, but it cannot read the block form — two block mappings that both
carry a `resource` collapse into one namespace and the first is lost. Write the
flow form; both are valid YAML, and a real YAML consumer recovers the same
structure from either.

## Non-goals

- Verdict/feedback machinery from the method specification (stays in the
  consuming repositories).
- Embedding- or retrieval-layer functionality.
- Security functionality, in either runtime — that is always
  `llm-ingestion-guard`'s domain.

## Requirements

Python 3.10+, and exactly one runtime dependency — the security boundary,
`llm-ingestion-guard>=0.2,<0.3`. Everything else is stdlib.

That guard is not on a package index yet, so **with pip, install it first** —
otherwise installing this package fails with `No matching distribution found
for llm-ingestion-guard`:

```
pip install "llm-ingestion-guard @ git+https://git.fromaitochitta.com/open/llm-ingestion-pipeline-security.git@v0.2.0"
pip install "llm-ingestion-okf @ git+https://git.fromaitochitta.com/open/llm-ingestion-okf.git@v0.4.0"
```

With uv, one command is enough — `uv pip install "llm-ingestion-okf @ git+…@v0.4.0"`
resolves the guard from the tag on its own, because uv reads the
`[tool.uv.sources]` entry in this project's `pyproject.toml` when it builds
from the source tree. Both paths were measured on 2026-07-25.

A git URL is a PEP 508 direct reference and pins one exact tag, so it is an
install-time *channel*, not the pin: the range above stays the declared
dependency — the built wheel carries `Requires-Dist:
llm-ingestion-guard<0.3,>=0.2` — and resolves normally once the package index
exists. The optional `[extract]` extra (pdf/docx/xlsx parsers) is not
populated yet. The planned Node half targets Node/ESM with zero npm
dependencies.

## License

MIT — see [LICENSE](LICENSE).