1
0
Fork 0
Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
0903785187 release(0.6.1): the ZWJ fix gets a tag a consumer can pin
a59184b fixed a hard-block that reached every emoji-composed document, and
llm-ingestion-okf was told so -- while the fix sat untagged on main. A consumer
cannot pin what has no tag, so the notice was a promise the repo had not kept.

SURFACES MOVED (the eight the 0.5.0 sweep established, plus the ninth verified)

  pyproject.toml           0.6.0 -> 0.6.1
  __init__.py              0.6.0 -> 0.6.1
  CHANGELOG.md             [0.6.1] entry, [Unreleased] reset to "Nothing yet."
  README.md                badge, install tag @v0.6.1
  docs/ADOPTION-BRIEF.md   `v0.6.0` x2, and 727 -> 736 passing
  CLAUDE.md                one clause: ZWJ judged by context, not identity
  SECURITY.md              `0.6.x` -- still true at 0.6.1, verified, not moved
  docs/BRIEF.md            `v0.6 (alpha)` -- likewise
  README.md:36             `v0.6`, alpha -- likewise
  forge description        re-verified THIS release: 178 codepoints, no version
                           claim. Not inherited from 0.6.0's check.

PATCH, NOT MINOR -- and it was asked, not assumed. 6bcb898 made "loosens the
upload door" the criterion for minor, and this loosens it too, so the reading
was put to the operator with the count rather than settled quietly. 0.6.0 was a
policy choice (`<base>` left the active name set by decision); this restores a
contract the module already published, against a class never meant to be
blocked. Measured loosening: 1 document of 1126 across the three FP populations
(reference-corpus 1/389, vendor-harvest 0/187, generated-notes 0/550), against
0.6.0's 25 + 2 + 2. Operator chose patch.

VERIFIED ON THE BUMPED TREE, NOT THE PRE-BUMP ONE

  736 passed; coverage 128/128 recall, 6/6 documented gaps hold
  `git grep '0\.6\.0'` returns provenance only -- LIMITATIONS history, the
    census script, source docstrings, tests, README's pre-0.6.0 numbers
  docs/LIMITATIONS.md: 34 items, README says 34
  __version__ and pyproject agree at 0.6.1
  no tracked file carries a stale current-state version or test count

The sweep tool itself was wrong first: `git grep -E '\b727\b'` returns nothing,
because POSIX ERE has no `\b`. An empty result read as "clean" when the claim
was there. Every sweep above is plain `git grep`.

Still to prove before this is announced: a scratch-venv install at the tag with
the resolved version asserted -- the README line above is only true once v0.6.1
resolves.
2026-08-11 22:30:32 +02:00
6bcb898632 release(0.6.0): the raw-html narrowing ships, and the version claims it already made become true
The narrowing landed in 736f370 and its prose asserted `0.6.0` in thirteen places
-- README's public front page among them -- while every version surface still read
0.5.0. That is the same defect class the last three commits were spent correcting:
a published number no measurement backs. Two ways out, land it or neutralize the
references; operator chose to cut.

SURFACES MOVED (the eight the 0.5.0 sweep established, plus the ninth verified)

  pyproject.toml           0.5.0 -> 0.6.0
  __init__.py              0.5.0 -> 0.6.0
  CHANGELOG.md             [Unreleased] -> [0.6.0], fresh [Unreleased]
  README.md                badge, `Status: v0.6`, install tag @v0.6.0
  SECURITY.md              support window `0.5.x` -> `0.6.x`
  docs/BRIEF.md            `v0.5 (alpha)` -> `v0.6 (alpha)`
  docs/ADOPTION-BRIEF.md   `v0.5.0` x2, and 717 -> 727 passing
  CLAUDE.md                `v0.5 (alpha)` -> `v0.6`, plus what 0.6.0 changed
  forge description        178 codepoints, carries no version claim -- verified,
                           not moved. A surface can be checked and stay still.

Measurement provenance is left alone, as in 0.5.0: `tests/test_disposition.py`'s
"0.5.0 axis separation", `disposition.py` and `calibration.py` docstrings,
LIMITATIONS' 0.5.0 reference, every dated claim in docs/PLAN-v1.md. Bumping those
falsifies the record rather than updating it.

MINOR, NOT PATCH: 0.6.0 loosens the upload door. A document whose only finding was
a doc-relative URL attribute on an inactive tag name, or an attribute-less
`<base />`, now WARNs where it was held -- 25 documents in the reference corpus, 2
in each wiki corpus.

VERIFIED BEFORE COMMITTING, NOT AFTER

  727 passed; coverage 128/128 recall, 6/6 documented gaps hold
  docs/LIMITATIONS.md: 33 items, README says 33
  rawhtml-census PRODUCTION row equals `A + base-url` on all three populations --
    the shipped predicate measured, not a hypothesis about it
  redos-sweep: 0 candidates of 152 patterns
  docs/fp-sweep.py still imports the private names it reaches into
  no tracked file carries a stale current-state version claim

Still to prove before the tag: `git show` over this commit's README, and a clean
clone install at this sha.
2026-08-11 18:01:36 +02:00
f669479777 release(0.5.0): the assessment axis ships, and every version surface moves with it
0.5.0 is the axis separation `de09711` built: `Risk` (assessment) alongside
`Disposition` (action), `Policy.action_map` as the supported override, and the
fail-closed path pinned to both axes. Additive and measured to be so — 717
passing with no test changed, matrix 128/128 with 6/6 documented gaps, the
`PRESET_USER_UPLOAD` grading table unchanged row by row. Plus the field FP
measurement (`d1bff60`) and the 0.3.3 behaviour-change correction (`d3d0928`).

WHY THIS COMMIT TOUCHES EIGHT FILES AND 0.4.0's TOUCHED THREE

0.4.0's release commit updated CHANGELOG, pyproject.toml and __init__.py, and
deferred README deliberately: the install block should not name a tag before a
clean-venv install had proven it resolved. Sound reasoning, and the proof step
never ran — so tag v0.4.0 permanently advertises v0.3.4. The tag is not moved.
The ordering is.

Sweeping every tracked file for a version claim, instead of ticking the four
surfaces the checklist named, found five more that no release had ever touched:

  SECURITY.md          "pre-1.0 (0.2.x)" — the one with a consequence for an
                       outsider: it named a support window two minor lines
                       behind the code.
  README.md            "**Status:** v0.3" — the front page, stale since 0.4.0.
  docs/BRIEF.md        "v0.2 (alpha)" — stale since 0.3.0.
  CLAUDE.md            "v0.2 (alpha)" and "12 moduler" where src/ has 15.
  docs/ADOPTION-BRIEF  "703 passing" where the suite is at 717.

Measurement provenance is deliberately left alone: "New in v0.4.0", "verified
identical on 0.2.0 and 0.3.1", "measured against the v0.3.1 tag", every
"post-0.4.0 tree" in LIMITATIONS. Bumping those falsifies the record instead of
updating it, which is why this cannot be a sed sweep — the surfaces have to be
sorted into current-state and provenance before a single edit.

Found because llm-ingestion-okf took our report of this defect class as a
hypothesis about their own repo, measured it, found a worse instance on their
public front page, and sent back the generalization: writing down a trap is not
the same as applying it.

VERIFIED BEFORE COMMITTING, NOT AFTER

  717 passed; coverage 128/128 recall, 6/6 documented gaps hold
  docs/LIMITATIONS.md: 33 items, README says 33
  fp-sweep reproduced all three published numbers exactly on the bumped tree —
    vendor-harvest 98/185 (53.0%), generated-notes 88/547 (16.1%),
    reference-corpus 133/389 (34.2%) — and self-docs runs clean, so the
    untested script survived the bump it imports names from
  forge description: 178 codepoints, under the 180 cap
  no tracked file carries a stale current-state version claim

Still to prove before the tag: a clean-venv install from this commit's sha, and
`git show <sha>` over the README. The install proves the package builds; only
the grep proves the text the tag will carry is right. That second check is the
one the old ordering could not perform, because by then the tag existed.
2026-08-11 06:42:56 +02:00
f4e89d2885 feat(egress): decode-rescan feeds base64 plaintext to secret-egress (review MINOR)
Output gate step 3 now runs scan_secret_egress over every decoded base64
blob's plaintext, not only scan_lexicon. A base64-wrapped credential that
formerly vanished (decode fed the lexicon, which has no secret patterns)
now surfaces as decoded:egress:* carrying the blob offset. Evidence stays
length-only, so the decoded finding never leaks the secret value.

Hex-wrapped secrets remain a documented honest-limit (entropy exposes
decoded plaintext for base64 only). README honest-limits + CLAUDE.md
Kontekst updated; 3 tests added (347 passed, was 344).
2026-07-15 07:11:29 +02:00
0772dafb70 feat(okf): scan reserved index.md/log.md in mode-b import, not path-reject (review MAJOR #2)
A received OKF bundle MAY legitimately carry index.md (directory listing, read
first under progressive disclosure) and log.md (update history) at any level
(spec §3.1/§6/§7). import_bundle previously hard-rejected those basenames in the
T4 path gate, so a conformant third-party bundle was over-blocked in full
(FAIL_SECURE) — and because the reject fired before scan_concept, index.md's
body (the highest-priority injection surface) was never scanned.

import_bundle now defaults allow_reserved=True: reserved basenames are scanned
as structural files (path-safety checks — traversal / absolute / backslash / .md
— still apply). The shadow-reject (an *upload* masquerading as index.md) is
preserved: the front-end passes allow_reserved=False so a materialized upload
landing on a reserved basename is still refused. That front-end opt-in was
required to keep the shadow-reject once the default flipped (not in the plan's
Filer set; traced from the code).

- okf.py: validate_concept_path/_validate_concept/import_bundle gain the
  keyword; validate_concept_path default stays False (strict standalone).
- tests: +3 (legit index/log admit; injection in index.md body caught;
  okf_version frontmatter admits). Per-concept-iteration test switched to a
  traversal vector; mode-b showcase's index.md surface reframed from
  reserved-name-reject to index.md-body-scan.
- README honest-limits + CLAUDE.md context note the mode-b/upload distinction.

Suite: 341 -> 344 passed. Core invariant intact (dependencies=[]).
2026-07-15 06:43:50 +02:00
4d53765c63 feat(guard): active-content detector wired into the output gate (review MAJOR #1)
Close the EchoLeak wiring hole (CVE-2025-32711 class): markdown images/
links, reference definitions, autolinks, raw active HTML and data: URIs
now surface as report-only findings (active:*, OWASP LLM05) in
scan_output step 6, so screen_output and okf.import_bundle dispose of
them instead of admitting them with findings=[].

- new active_content.py: canonical home of the shared pattern table +
  scan_active_content; neutralize refactored to import it (mutating API
  and behavior unchanged, all neutralize tests pass as-is)
- images/links flagged only for absolute/protocol-relative URLs:
  relative in-bundle links are legitimate wiki/OKF mechanism (principle 5)
- evidence carries defanged URLs only (hxxps://evil[.]example)
- EchoLeak vectors planted in both showcases; detach proofs cover them
- README export list + checklist step 6, CLAUDE.md context line updated

Suite: 321 -> 341 passed. Core invariant intact (dependencies=[]).
2026-07-15 06:11:33 +02:00
0af8f68cae feat(wiring): §6 bookends (prepare_input/screen_output) + full public API + README v0.1 (TDD)
Module 11 (final) — the top-level wiring. The library never makes the model call
(no SDK imported by the core), so the public surface is the toolkit plus two
library-side bookends around the caller's tool-less transform (Form 1, chosen
with the operator over an export-only toolkit and a full orchestrator — the
bookends fit existing pipelines with least friction, encode the two halves the
library can stand for, and impose no control flow):

- prepare_input(text, source=INPUT) -> PreparedInput(fenced, nonce, report):
  §6 steps 1-2, sanitize THEN fence (carrier can never smuggle a forged
  delimiter). Merged report carries both steps' findings; renders no disposition.
- screen_output(text, policy, *, provenance, transform_failed) -> DispositionResult:
  §6 steps 6-7, scan_output under guard() so a scanner error fails CLOSED
  (FAIL_SECURE, never a silent persist). transform_failed routes the compound
  forced-fallback rule.
- __all__ exports the full framework-agnostic surface: detectors, result types,
  disposition machinery + presets, contract asserters, the grounding seam.

Docs: README refreshed from the stale "brief / pre-implementation" line to a v0.1
alpha status with a Form-1 quickstart, the §6 adopt-this checklist, and an honest
-limitations section (structural unsolvability at the text layer; semantic
poisoning invisible to lexicon+entropy; text-only, no multimodal). CHANGELOG
seeded; CLAUDE.md remote/status lines corrected (remote IS set, no longer
brief-stage).

10 wiring tests (public surface, prepare_input compose, screen_output fail-closed
+ compound). 189 green (showcase + corpora follow).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HyRCQMocjZ6SmSQ6JidJ2k
2026-07-04 23:34:28 +02:00
39991bd251 chore: repo scaffolding via /repo-init
Add .gitignore (Python stack + obligatory lines; /STATE.md kept local-only
until a private remote exists), CHANGELOG.md, and the Communication patterns
section in CLAUDE.md. STATE.md is gitignored — must never reach the public
open/ mirror.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01K8GmKRCdsPjWYAKWsNgeQS
2026-07-04 08:39:23 +02:00
b505f70485 docs: design brief for reusable LLM ingestion-pipeline security library
Brief-stage repo. docs/BRIEF.md defines a minimal, framework-agnostic
library that packages the write-time ingestion contract (sanitize ->
fence -> tool-less quarantined transform -> per-stage capability
isolation -> scan output before persist -> fail-secure) as reusable
code. Positioned honestly against query-time guardrails (LLM Guard,
NeMo, Rebuff, Vigil) with a prior-art verification log. Reference
implementation: claude-code-llm-wiki Stage B.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HPAmFyEVWbwvmSNVdXTu4d
2026-07-04 06:18:32 +02:00