OWASP's Top 10 for LLM Applications 2026 renumbered the list; only LLM01
and LLM02 kept their meaning. Every finding's `owasp` was written against
2025 with no year, so EchoLeak findings said LLM05, which in 2026 means
Data and Model Poisoning. Row 2 of the 2026 done-criterion counted 95
such sites at 6702d7a (82 old meaning, 13 wrong); it is now 0.
- Producers name the risk, never the number: one table (`_owasp.py`)
owns `LLMnn:2026`. The vendored lexicon stays byte-equal with commons
and gets its year where the finding is made; a commons number whose
meaning moved between editions raises instead of being guessed.
- Mechanical map from the 2025 meaning (verified against the publisher
in session 1): LLM05 -> LLM10:2026, LLM06 -> LLM03:2026,
LLM10 -> LLM06:2026, LLM08 -> LLM09:2026, LLM04 -> LLM05:2026.
The 13 wrong-meaning sites, judged:
- Factual poisoning (PoisonedRAG gap, and the test that follows it):
LLM05:2026. The 2026 text names "RAG Knowledge Base Poisoning" as its
example 6. It said LLM09, which was Misinformation.
- Fail-secure (README row, matrix row): no number. It is the guard's own
failure semantics; no edition describes it. Was LLM10.
- Parser-surface refusals (nested mapping, block scalar, quoted flow
element, off-allowlist key): no number. Refusing a shape the parser
would have to interpret is not resource consumption. Was LLM10. The
anchor and merge-key rows stay LLM06:2026 (alias expansion is DoS).
- `resource` URL and cross-link scheme validation (4): no number. They
validate received bundle metadata; LLM10:2026 is about model output
and says input validation belongs to LLM01. Was LLM05.
- `_raise_case` default (OKF path traversal, absolute path, reserved
name, non-.md, bundle escape): no number. None is prompt injection.
Was LLM01.
A doubtful number would be the misreading the year exists to prevent,
so `Case.owasp` is now Optional and the matrix prints "-".
Self-safety (input caps, ReDoS) keeps LLM06:2026: the 2026 text, read at
the publisher, covers "input flood ... exploiting processing
inefficiencies" and application-side rechunking. The README's LLM09
anchor (Misinformation) is dropped; it was the factual-poisoning row.
The permanent test (tests/test_catalog_numbers.py) fails on an old or
wrong number, on a number without the year outside the vendored
lexicon, and on any finding the coverage matrix drives whose `owasp`
lacks the newest year; "newest" is read from the catalog register. The
census holds its wrong-rules to their counts at the frozen revision
only, so the frozen listing (da1aa0fa...6f) is unchanged.
A received OKF bundle MAY legitimately carry index.md (directory listing, read
first under progressive disclosure) and log.md (update history) at any level
(spec §3.1/§6/§7). import_bundle previously hard-rejected those basenames in the
T4 path gate, so a conformant third-party bundle was over-blocked in full
(FAIL_SECURE) — and because the reject fired before scan_concept, index.md's
body (the highest-priority injection surface) was never scanned.
import_bundle now defaults allow_reserved=True: reserved basenames are scanned
as structural files (path-safety checks — traversal / absolute / backslash / .md
— still apply). The shadow-reject (an *upload* masquerading as index.md) is
preserved: the front-end passes allow_reserved=False so a materialized upload
landing on a reserved basename is still refused. That front-end opt-in was
required to keep the shadow-reject once the default flipped (not in the plan's
Filer set; traced from the code).
- okf.py: validate_concept_path/_validate_concept/import_bundle gain the
keyword; validate_concept_path default stays False (strict standalone).
- tests: +3 (legit index/log admit; injection in index.md body caught;
okf_version frontmatter admits). Per-concept-iteration test switched to a
traversal vector; mode-b showcase's index.md surface reframed from
reserved-name-reject to index.md-body-scan.
- README honest-limits + CLAUDE.md context note the mode-b/upload distinction.
Suite: 341 -> 344 passed. Core invariant intact (dependencies=[]).
Close the EchoLeak wiring hole (CVE-2025-32711 class): markdown images/
links, reference definitions, autolinks, raw active HTML and data: URIs
now surface as report-only findings (active:*, OWASP LLM05) in
scan_output step 6, so screen_output and okf.import_bundle dispose of
them instead of admitting them with findings=[].
- new active_content.py: canonical home of the shared pattern table +
scan_active_content; neutralize refactored to import it (mutating API
and behavior unchanged, all neutralize tests pass as-is)
- images/links flagged only for absolute/protocol-relative URLs:
relative in-bundle links are legitimate wiki/OKF mechanism (principle 5)
- evidence carries defanged URLs only (hxxps://evil[.]example)
- EchoLeak vectors planted in both showcases; detach proofs cover them
- README export list + checklist step 6, CLAUDE.md context line updated
Suite: 321 -> 341 passed. Core invariant intact (dependencies=[]).
The OKF analogue of tests/test_showcase.py: one received external bundle plants
one attack per OKF surface (T1 body + frontmatter-description, T3 non-https
resource, T4 path-traversal + reserved-name, T2 dangerous frontmatter value,
T5a dangerous-scheme link, §7.2 dangling link, homoglyph-obfuscated body) run
through the public okf surface as an upload-inbox consumer would compose it.
Aggregate fails secure -> REJECT; a clean bundle admits (WARN); the log marks
rejected concepts. Detach-proof: an always-admit gate catches none of the
surfaces, so the assertions have teeth. Stream-2 centrepiece (PLAN §212);
Stage-1 realistic upload extraction (§247) is the next increment.
Tests 277 -> 282.
