Rows 1-3 hold on 1.8.0: 16/16 catalogues current, 0 stale catalogue numbers
(frozen denominator 95 at 6702d7a unchanged), 17 attacks caught and 2
documented gaps with none red. The project rules now say the remote is the
public open/ repository, and .claude/ is ignored so local session state cannot
be added by accident.
Session 7 of the 2026 threat plan (attack row 3): A08, A09, A12, A16 and
A19 were red. Their payloads are ordinary English with no marker.
- indirect:prose-instruction (MEDIUM): a paragraph that combines two of
four classes: it speaks to the model, it is meant to act later, it
writes to the model's memory, it hides from the user. One class alone is
ordinary prose. A keyword prefilter skips text where no non-address
class can match. Catches A08, A09, A16 and A19.
- A12 (a task with no marker) is the seventh documented gap; a rule that
caught it would be fitted to the payload's words.
- redos-sweep walked no dicts, so the new class patterns were swept by
nothing. It walks dicts now: 168 patterns, 0 flagged; positive control
flagged at x4.0.
Measured before building: 0 of 5494 benign documents fire (the three FP
corpora, 577 package READMEs, 1412 vendor-published agent skills). Guard
rule before/after: FP 106/198, 196/2918, 108/389 identical line for line;
OKF import 47/31 identical. Matrix 144/144 + 7/7 gaps, suite 1233 passed.
Row 3: 17 caught, 2 gaps, 0 open.
Session 6 of the 2026 threat plan (attack row 3): A05 output was red.
CamoLeak renders a secret as one image per character from a URL alphabet;
each URL is ordinary, so each image graded LOW and the gate WARNed.
- active:markdown-image-sequence (MEDIUM): at least 4 ordinary external
images, inline or reference-style, on one URL template whose varying
tokens are 2 chars or fewer, or digit runs. Digits that count up in
document order are a counter and carry nothing. The per-image grade is
unchanged; the finding sits beside it.
- Accepted twins (flag tables, figures 1a/1b) go to review; measured
evasions (word dictionary, 3-char symbols, counter increments, run of 3,
a template per symbol) are in LIMITATIONS.
Guard rule before/after: FP 106/198, 196/2918, 108/389 identical. Those
corpora hold no external markdown image, so the rule was also run on 577
package READMEs (312 with external images): 0 firings at run lengths 3-8.
OKF import 47/31 identical. Matrix 140/140, ReDoS 163 patterns 0 flagged,
suite 1179 passed + 5 xfailed. Row 3: 13 caught, 1 gap, 5 open.
Session 5 of the 2026 threat plan (attack row 3): A04 and A15 were red.
- html-obfuscation:tiny-font (HIGH): font below 4px. ShadowLeak's 1px passed
because the commons zero-font row only matches a leading 0.
- html-obfuscation:invisible-colour (HIGH): text within 8 per channel of the
background in the same style attribute, or transparent. White alone is not
a signal (email buttons); measured residual in LIMITATIONS.
- output:html-comment-present (MEDIUM): a comment in the artifact outside
fenced code and inline code. 253/254 comments in the reference corpus sit
in code.
Local to output.py; the vendored lexicon stays byte-equal with commons.
Guard rule before/after: FP 106/198, 196/2918, 108/389 identical; OKF 6/53
and 47/31 identical. Matrix 139/139, ReDoS 161 patterns 0 flagged, suite
1142 passed + 6 xfailed. Row 3: 12 caught, 1 gap, 6 open.
Row 1 of the 2026 done-criterion: 16 of 16 register entries on the newest
edition, each with a check date and a source link, re-read at the publisher
on 2026-10-31.
- README: new subsection mapping OWASP ASI06 and seven MITRE ATLAS v2026.10
techniques to what the guard stops at the write and what it does not;
a dated catalog table; the threat-model anchors are linked.
- ATLAS moved to v2026.10 (2026-10-28) after session 1; AML.T0057 no longer
exists there and is not linked.
- Register 1.1.0: `cited` beside `latest` on every entry; CleanBase added
(cited in BRIEF, unregistered); unverifiable sources kept as candidates.
- tests/test_catalog_register.py fails on a missing date or link, an older
cited edition, or a README ATLAS/ASI id the register has not verified.
- ZWJ measurement re-taken on Unicode 18.0 (1614 sequences, 122/122); the
"458 unassigned" figure came from Python's Unicode 16.0, 406 in 18.0.
OWASP's Top 10 for LLM Applications 2026 renumbered the list; only LLM01
and LLM02 kept their meaning. Every finding's `owasp` was written against
2025 with no year, so EchoLeak findings said LLM05, which in 2026 means
Data and Model Poisoning. Row 2 of the 2026 done-criterion counted 95
such sites at 6702d7a (82 old meaning, 13 wrong); it is now 0.
- Producers name the risk, never the number: one table (`_owasp.py`)
owns `LLMnn:2026`. The vendored lexicon stays byte-equal with commons
and gets its year where the finding is made; a commons number whose
meaning moved between editions raises instead of being guessed.
- Mechanical map from the 2025 meaning (verified against the publisher
in session 1): LLM05 -> LLM10:2026, LLM06 -> LLM03:2026,
LLM10 -> LLM06:2026, LLM08 -> LLM09:2026, LLM04 -> LLM05:2026.
The 13 wrong-meaning sites, judged:
- Factual poisoning (PoisonedRAG gap, and the test that follows it):
LLM05:2026. The 2026 text names "RAG Knowledge Base Poisoning" as its
example 6. It said LLM09, which was Misinformation.
- Fail-secure (README row, matrix row): no number. It is the guard's own
failure semantics; no edition describes it. Was LLM10.
- Parser-surface refusals (nested mapping, block scalar, quoted flow
element, off-allowlist key): no number. Refusing a shape the parser
would have to interpret is not resource consumption. Was LLM10. The
anchor and merge-key rows stay LLM06:2026 (alias expansion is DoS).
- `resource` URL and cross-link scheme validation (4): no number. They
validate received bundle metadata; LLM10:2026 is about model output
and says input validation belongs to LLM01. Was LLM05.
- `_raise_case` default (OKF path traversal, absolute path, reserved
name, non-.md, bundle escape): no number. None is prompt injection.
Was LLM01.
A doubtful number would be the misreading the year exists to prevent,
so `Case.owasp` is now Optional and the matrix prints "-".
Self-safety (input caps, ReDoS) keeps LLM06:2026: the 2026 text, read at
the publisher, covers "input flood ... exploiting processing
inefficiencies" and application-side rechunking. The README's LLM09
anchor (Misinformation) is dropped; it was the factual-poisoning row.
The permanent test (tests/test_catalog_numbers.py) fails on an old or
wrong number, on a number without the year outside the vendored
lexicon, and on any finding the coverage matrix drives whose `owasp`
lacks the newest year; "newest" is read from the catalog register. The
census holds its wrong-rules to their counts at the frozen revision
only, so the frozen listing (da1aa0fa...6f) is unchanged.
Variation-selector smuggling (A01) and Sneaky Bits (A02) gave 0 findings
on 1.4.1 and stayed in the sanitized text. The denominator is now the
frozen Unicode 18.0 set (DICP | Cf | Co, 141 674 codepoints); each one is
stripped and flagged unless a known legitimate use exempts it on context:
one VS15/16 after an emoji base, one ideographic selector after a CJK
ideograph, ZWNJ/ZWJ beside Arabic-script or Indic letters, LRM/RLM/ALM
in a document with RTL text, an Arabic number sign before a digit. A run
is always a carrier; private use is caught in full (operator decisions
2026-10-28). One predicate serves sanitize, the output gate and the
lexicon's word-split row, whose regex stays byte-identical with commons.
A01 and A02 are green; the FP populations and the pinned OKF corpus are
identical before and after.
Rows 1-3 of the done-criterion now carry frozen denominators: 15
catalogs (0 dated), 95 number sites, 19 attacks (8 caught, 1 documented
gap, 10 red). The 2025 -> 2026 mapping is re-verified against OWASP,
and the attack batches for sessions 5-7 are proposed.
The approved direction heads the plan: every cited catalog on its newest
edition with a check date and source link, no catalog ID carrying an older
edition's meaning, and the known 2025-2026 attacks that can reach an
ingestion pipeline as test cases, each caught or documented as a gap.
Measured on v1.4.1 before anything is built: LLM03-LLM10 carry their 2025
meaning in 101 places across 26 tracked files, and 17 of 19 invisible or
deceptive code-point types (variation selectors among them) pass sanitize
with no finding.
The output gate claimed LLM10 self-safety on the grounds that its patterns have
no nested quantifiers. True, and irrelevant: nesting is not what makes these
blow up. A run in front of a REQUIRED literal, reachable from a short anchor, is
enough -- crafted input repeats the anchor and never supplies the literal, so
every start position rescans the tail. Quadratic, not exponential, and the
max_scan_chars cap does not help: it bounds the input, and quadratic work on a
bounded input is still hours.
Measured, not argued. `<a:` x 100_000 took 23.4s in AUTOLINK_RE alone; the
composed gate on that payload took 458.7s, extrapolating to ~5.7 hours at the
1_000_000-char input the gate itself accepts. Size-matched ordinary prose runs
0.31s, so the separation is 18x-660x -- unlike the blob in the neighbouring
test, which is the *faster* side of prose and never exercised backtracking.
Two fixes, chosen per pattern rather than uniformly:
- active_content + lexicon JSON (15 runs): exclude the character that opens the
pattern's own anchor (`[` for markdown, `<` for tags), so a run cannot reach
past the next start position and the per-start costs telescope. Verified to
cost no recall: long URLs, long alt text, and `<` inside a quoted attribute
all still match. Bounding instead would have been linear too but wrong here --
the content is attacker-controlled, so padding past a bound would be a
one-line bypass of the EchoLeak class this table exists to catch.
- connstr egress (4 runs): bound the password at MAX_CONNSTR_VALUE. The
exclusion fix is unavailable -- the anchor character is `/` and passwords
containing `/` are the common case (measured: they match today). The residual
miss is a credential over 256 chars; a token that long is still caught by
egress:jwt-token.
hybrid-xss:script-tag had neither option: its run is the script BODY, which may
legitimately contain `<`. It now matches the opening tag and drops the
`</script>` requirement. That also closes a fail-open -- `<script>alert(1)`
unclosed was silently missed -- at the cost of flagging prose that merely
mentions `<script>`, now documented.
Found by the composed-gate test staying red after every individual scanner was
already linear: the lexicon's six html-obfuscation patterns were the remaining
813x. A per-scanner test alone would have shipped that.
662 passed (was 642), and faster than before the fix.
PLAN.md's test-plan line read as if both scan paths carried ReDoS coverage.
f74245f measured that the output path's "pathological" payload is the FASTER
side against size-matched ordinary prose (0.93x / 0.96x, order swapped), so it
does not exercise catastrophic backtracking at all.
Leaving the line unscoped would be the same defect c0899e9 just retracted in
LIMITATIONS.md: a committed claim resting on a premise now known to be false.
Names which path carries which duty and says plainly that a crafted payload for
the output regexes does not exist. No new limitation bullet -- 27 stays 27.
Reframe .pdf from a 'known gap'/TODO to a deliberate concession across the
honest-limits and OKF-upload docs. A top-level .pdf drop is already refused as
an unsupported format (inbox_frontend.py raises on the else branch), not
half-scanned; adding a PDF parser + reportlab (solely to author white-on-white
test fixtures) is disproportionate for a dev-scoped showcase, and the OCR /
font-render stego carriers a PDF would smuggle are out of scope regardless.
- README honest-limits: .pdf = concession, not TODO; only the numeric CSV FP
remains a known gap.
- docs/PLAN.md: upload table .pdf row marked 'conceded'; honest-scope paragraph
names .pdf; assertions tightened to 'every accepted format'.
Closes the last format gap before v1.0 freeze (Session G). No code touched;
357 tests green.
Replace the unverified/absolute novelty statement with the defensible
four-part-contract form, verified against a focused adversarial PyPI+GitHub
survey (2026-07-15):
- BRIEF §11: 'assumed, not verified' -> verified survey with sources. Names
aig-guardian (real, query-time; blurs only the minimal-dep-library
differentiator), GuardLLM (nearest neighbour, runtime hardening, no
scan-before-persist / capability isolation / fail-secure), and ipi-scanner
(orphaned placeholder repo, recorded for honesty not as prior art).
- README: differentiator moved from 'library vs hosted/model' to the full
four-part write-time contract.
- PLAN §27-31: drop the unverifiable 'the first' superlative.
Also promotes the v1.0 session plan (PLAN-v1.md) and the cross-model review
(review-2026-07.md) into docs/ on the open/ mirror, referenced by PLAN.md's
re-sequencing addendum.
Ground-truth pass over the named flagship consumer (portfolio-optimiser's
'OKF-upload-inbox') found it does not exist as a seam: both optimiser siblings
are frozen at release, carry their own OKF layer, receive no external bundles,
and take no dependency on this guard. Defer consumer integration (stream 2)
until the guard is mature; mature it here first, Node-port-friendly. Next
concrete build is the in-repo OKF inbox showcase (mode-b import_bundle as a
receive/quarantine gate), spec'd under 'The OKF inbox showcase'.
One realistic content sample carrying many vulnerabilities at once, run through
a mock ingestion pipeline (sanitize -> lexicon+entropy+decode-rescan -> output
gate -> disposition); assert every planted vuln is caught and disposition fails
secure. Doubles as the README worked example. Added to build-order step 11 and
the test strategy; tracked as task #11. Inspiration: llm-security/examples/*.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01K8GmKRCdsPjWYAKWsNgeQS
