0.5.0 is the axis separation `de09711` built: `Risk` (assessment) alongside `Disposition` (action), `Policy.action_map` as the supported override, and the fail-closed path pinned to both axes. Additive and measured to be so — 717 passing with no test changed, matrix 128/128 with 6/6 documented gaps, the `PRESET_USER_UPLOAD` grading table unchanged row by row. Plus the field FP measurement (`d1bff60`) and the 0.3.3 behaviour-change correction (`d3d0928`). WHY THIS COMMIT TOUCHES EIGHT FILES AND 0.4.0's TOUCHED THREE 0.4.0's release commit updated CHANGELOG, pyproject.toml and __init__.py, and deferred README deliberately: the install block should not name a tag before a clean-venv install had proven it resolved. Sound reasoning, and the proof step never ran — so tag v0.4.0 permanently advertises v0.3.4. The tag is not moved. The ordering is. Sweeping every tracked file for a version claim, instead of ticking the four surfaces the checklist named, found five more that no release had ever touched: SECURITY.md "pre-1.0 (0.2.x)" — the one with a consequence for an outsider: it named a support window two minor lines behind the code. README.md "**Status:** v0.3" — the front page, stale since 0.4.0. docs/BRIEF.md "v0.2 (alpha)" — stale since 0.3.0. CLAUDE.md "v0.2 (alpha)" and "12 moduler" where src/ has 15. docs/ADOPTION-BRIEF "703 passing" where the suite is at 717. Measurement provenance is deliberately left alone: "New in v0.4.0", "verified identical on 0.2.0 and 0.3.1", "measured against the v0.3.1 tag", every "post-0.4.0 tree" in LIMITATIONS. Bumping those falsifies the record instead of updating it, which is why this cannot be a sed sweep — the surfaces have to be sorted into current-state and provenance before a single edit. Found because llm-ingestion-okf took our report of this defect class as a hypothesis about their own repo, measured it, found a worse instance on their public front page, and sent back the generalization: writing down a trap is not the same as applying it. VERIFIED BEFORE COMMITTING, NOT AFTER 717 passed; coverage 128/128 recall, 6/6 documented gaps hold docs/LIMITATIONS.md: 33 items, README says 33 fp-sweep reproduced all three published numbers exactly on the bumped tree — vendor-harvest 98/185 (53.0%), generated-notes 88/547 (16.1%), reference-corpus 133/389 (34.2%) — and self-docs runs clean, so the untested script survived the bump it imports names from forge description: 178 codepoints, under the 180 cap no tracked file carries a stale current-state version claim Still to prove before the tag: a clean-venv install from this commit's sha, and `git show <sha>` over the README. The install proves the package builds; only the grep proves the text the tag will carry is right. That second check is the one the old ordering could not perform, because by then the tag existed.
2.3 KiB
llm-ingestion-pipeline-security
Kontekst
Gjenbrukbar, minimal defensiv layer for LLM ingestion-pipelines (write-time), til forskjell fra query-time chatbot-guardrails. Pakker det arkitektoniske kontraktet — sanitize → fence → tool-less karantenert transform → per-stadium capability-isolasjon → scan output før commit → fail-secure — som komponerbar, framework-agnostisk kode.
Referanse-implementasjon: claude-code-llm-wiki Stage B (tools/wiki_ingest/).
Lexikon-seed: injection-patterns.mjs fra llm-security-pluginen.
Repoet er på v0.5 (alpha): stdlib-kjernen er bygget og testet (15 moduler +
topp-nivå wiring, showcase + korpus), inkl. OKF-adapter og aktivt-innhold-
detektor (EchoLeak-klassen) i output-gaten. Mode-b import_bundle skanner
reserverte strukturfiler (index.md/log.md) i mottatte bundles i stedet for å
path-avvise dem; upload-front-end beholder shadow-reject (allow_reserved=False).
Output-gatens decode-and-rescan mater dekodet base64-klartekst gjennom BÅDE lexicon
og secret-egress (LLM02), så en base64-innpakket credential fanges som
decoded:egress:* i stedet for å forsvinne; hex-innpakket er en dokumentert
restgap (entropy eksponerer kun base64-klartekst).
Start med docs/BRIEF.md for design, README.md for bruk, docs/PLAN.md for
byggerekkefølgen.
Konvensjoner
- Norsk for dialog og planer, engelsk for kode og innhold (repoet er publisert).
- Ingen GitHub — kun Forgejo (
git.fromaitochitta.com). - Remote satt: offentlig
open/-speil på Forgejo; push hver commit (durabelt autorisert). - Minimal-dependency: stdlib-first kjerne; ML/judge-detektorer bak extras.
Communication patterns
Linking to local files
When pointing to local files in responses, always use markdown link syntax with a descriptive name:
- Use
[Human-friendly name](file:///absolute/path)— never barefile:///...URLs or autolinks<file://...>. - Always use absolute paths. Never
~/or relative paths. - For multiple files, render as a bullet list of named markdown links.
Why: bare file:// URLs only render the first as clickable across multiple lines. Named markdown links make each entry independently clickable and look cleaner.
Example: