secret-egress.json 0.2.0 -> 0.3.0. `OpenAI Legacy API Key` enters at order 17,
second to last; JWT stays last because ordering.last_entry_is_load_bearing says
it must. 18 -> 19.
The regex was in the coord message that reported it. That is the path
evidence_limits explicitly ruled out, so it was read out of the module text at
a pinned public commit instead: refs/heads/main = 47905da, and 088e458 (which
carries the entry) confirmed an ancestor with `git merge-base --is-ancestor`
rather than accepted from their log.
The entry is the smaller half. All 19 positions were compared against the
module - name, source, flags, order - with 0 divergences, so positions 0-16 are
no longer resting on a 2026-08-09 transcription whose module fidelity stood
recorded as llm-security's assertion. It is reproduced now, and both the
fidelity bullet and the staleness bullet retire.
manifest.json 0.3.2: the blocker prose promised its note would stand until this
landed. Item (2) is marked closed and the count moves 18 -> 19. The blocker
itself does NOT close - 19 against the guard's 25 at different cut points is a
table reconciliation nobody has performed, and one closed hole is not that.
Verified: JSON well-formed, orders contiguous 0..18, count matches array length,
new pattern compiles in Node bare, Node `u` and Python `re`, and does not match
sk-ant-/sk-proj- shapes. Charter clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JLEZ4XCSnSrQUFA8SzkQB4
org-ops recorded SECURITY.md as missing against the org standard (coord,
2026-08-11) and this repository owed it for a sharper reason than "given what
the repo is about": nothing here runs, so a report is never a crash — it is a
detection entry that looks like it works and is not looking.
SECURITY.md therefore answers what an ordinary policy does not have to: how to
report that a detection-table entry is WRONG, and why a confirmed defect in
extracted data is decided in the runtime it was extracted from before it is
changed here. Correcting it here would make the copy disagree with the
implementation it was taken from — two runtimes, two answers on one input, the
exact failure this repository exists to prevent. Two classes skip that routing:
a real secret in the history, and data authored here rather than extracted.
Fix latency is stated plainly as bounded by the owning runtime's schedule and
the consumer's pull, not by ours.
secret-egress 0.1.0 -> 0.2.0 is a staleness DISCLOSURE, not a data change: all
18 patterns byte-identical, one evidence_limits entry added. llm-security
reports the source table at 19 entries now; recorded as their report and not
reproduced, because the commit carrying it is not on their public remote —
measured at b1ba1fb today. What was measured here: none of the 18 patterns
matches a legacy sk-...T3BlbkFJ... shape. A consumer vendoring this file
under-matches the seed hook by one entry, and now reads that in the file.
manifest 0.3.0 -> 0.3.1 corrects the secret-egress blocker. Through 0.3.0 it
named gcp-service-account-json and openai-api-key-legacy together as ids
"absent here". Measured against the guard at e671edb by running this file's own
18 patterns over a service-account document: a COMPLETE service-account key
file is matched here at order 11, since the PEM entry's prefix group is
optional and the bare PKCS#8 header matches; the same document with private_key
removed matches nothing here while the guard's marker still fires. That is a
cut-point difference, which is what the blocker is about, not a missing entry.
openai-api-key-legacy IS a real hole and is now recorded as one. Folded into
the existing blocker string rather than a sibling key, because blockers is a
map from table path to text.
Verified: all JSON well-formed; every non-fixture JSON has a top-level version;
charter clean (no executable code); patterns[] and count byte-identical to HEAD
for secret-egress; manifest key set unchanged and count still 90; 90 case
directories untouched; every spec still carries its normative marker.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T85QqeiWBEoBMjWaMiBnxD
conformance/hybrid-xss__script-tag--src-no-close/ — input `<script src=x.js>`,
17 bytes, expecting hybrid-xss:script-tag. This is the regression gate for the
convergence in the previous commit, and the reason the corpus could not see that
change coming: the existing hybrid-xss__script-tag input `<script>steal()</script>`
matches the pattern under BOTH forms, so it passes either way.
Mutation-verified in both directions across all 90 cases: reverting the pattern to
its 0.6.0 form fails this case and only this case.
The case-id derivation blocked it, and the fix is an extension rather than a
workaround. case_id_derivation gains an optional `--<variant>` suffix; the reverse
transform truncates at the first `--` then maps `__` to `:`. `--` was measured
absent from all 83 ratified pattern ids and all 89 pre-existing case ids, so the
reverse transform stays purely lexical — no lookup against the id list — which is
the property the original one-to-one rule was protecting. No existing case id
moves, so this is additive.
one_case_per_pattern_id is removed, superseded by variant_suffix.supersedes, which
quotes its text. It documented the constraint rather than carrying data a consumer
matches on, but a removed key is normally breaking here, so it is called out.
That same rule cost a real case: omitted_payloads gains
derivation_ground_withdrawn_in_0_3_0. The guard's seventh active-content payload
was omitted on TWO grounds and this change retires one. The other stands — its
in-scope finding set is identical to a case already built — so the payload stays
omitted, on one ground instead of two. It is NOT added back; that is a separate
decision, not a consequence of this one.
First case input authored in this repository rather than reproduced verbatim from
a runtime's payload set, so it goes in a new authored_payloads block instead of
being folded into payload_provenance, whose value is exactly the claim that its
inputs are verbatim upstream. That claim stays as strong as it was: 83 of 83.
Both witnesses for this axis were named by llm-security on 2026-08-10; this is the
first of the two. It was declined that day on the ground that a fixture encoding a
DISAGREEMENT is worse than an absent one — it then contradicted commons' own
published lexicon. Lexicon 0.7.0 removed the contradiction. The stated order was
"settle the row, then the case is trivial to add".
Findings measured through the guard's public API (scan_lexicon,
scan_active_content) at 0dce50f / 0.5.0 — not read off the regex. The same harness
reproduced the existing case's committed bytes and sha256 in the same run as a
control, which is what licenses trusting its output for the new one. Digest
independently recomputed with shasum over the file on disk: agrees.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HuudQLGMyMenuyeZk8fKs5
pattern_id_space.verified cited active_content.py:337-369 and :309. Those resolve at
de09711, where the check was run; this file's provenance pins 0bf0729, where the same
six call sites are at 316-348 and the emitter at 288. The 23-line scan-cap insert
shifts everything below it by 21, so a reader following the pin landed on the wrong
lines - and on lines that look plausible rather than obviously wrong.
Same defect class as the at_commit_note corrected before the first commit, one layer
deeper: a measured fact stated without the coordinate it is true in. Both commits'
numbers are now given, plus the symbol names, which are stable across the diff and
are what a reader should actually match on.
omitted_payloads[0].source gets the same treatment - coverage.py:484 is de09711-
relative, and the structural description now carries the load instead.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CVouC9nsfrfV5jRSejxbvQ
The corpus goes 83 -> 89 and scope_covered gains signatures/active-content.json.
The blocker in STATE dissolved under measurement, the same way last session's
13-pattern one did. "An id space for carriers/active-content/secret-egress" was one
question in name only; the three tables have three unrelated problems:
- active-content needed NO id space invented. label_format ("active:{class}") and the
constructs keys were already extracted verbatim from the seed runtime, and their
concatenation IS what it emits - verified by comparing the six keys to the six class
strings at its _flag call sites. What blocked these cases was never naming; it was
spec section 1, fixed in the parent commit.
- carriers has no adoptable id space AND an entry-point dependence underneath it.
- secret-egress is not an id question at all: the two runtimes carry DIFFERENT tables.
18 entries here against the guard's 25, cut at different granularities - this file's
single `GitHub Token` is four ids there, `Private Key PEM Block` three, `Database
connection string` four - with membership diverging both ways. `aws-access-key-id`
is the one clean 1:1, which is why exactly one egress case was ever offered. That
number was a symptom, not modesty.
Both blockers are now recorded under scope_planned.blockers, measured, replacing a
blanket "no runtime has agreed to an id space" that was wrong for both.
Generated from measurement, not written. Payloads were extracted from the seed
runtime's coverage.py by AST - evaluating each _scan_case argument in that module's
own namespace rather than retyping detection data - then run through its public
output gate, the same entry point the 83 lexicon cases used. The fixtures were then
re-read from disk by a separate checker that re-computed every digest, re-scanned the
bytes and applied exact-within-scope independently of the generator: 6 cases, 0
failed checks.
Six built from seven offered. The runtime's matrix drives two payloads at
`active:markdown-image`; measured, their in-scope finding sets are identical, and the
second's only distinguishing signal (entropy:base64-blob) falls outside every table
this repository publishes. Dropped rather than given a discriminated case id, and
named under omitted_payloads so the count reads as a decision.
These six prove LESS than the 83, and the manifest says so: their payloads come from
the only runtime implementing the table, so no second implementation's agreement
could be measured. They pin one runtime's behaviour as a contract a future
implementer can be held to - less than cross-runtime agreement, more than nothing.
llm-security's absence of the table is measured at b0de0ca, not assumed: a tree-wide
search finds no implementation, and `git log -S` over --all returns zero commits,
closing the "it was there once" reading. Absent table is not absent capability -
their entropy scanner reaches markdown-image URLs by another route - and the manifest
says that too.
Provenance and measurement for the active-content half are kept in their own blocks:
a different source structure at a different commit, and one pin must not stand for
two measurements. The guard's HEAD moved twice during the work (3c56d50 -> de09711 ->
398eb74); measurement ran at de09711 and the drift is recorded, including that
active_content.py is NOT identical to the 0bf0729 the data file pins - the change
adds a scan-cap self-safety finding and touches no construct.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CVouC9nsfrfV5jRSejxbvQ
llm-ingestion-pipeline-security states (coord message 2026-08-10T12:42:31Z)
that _LEX_PAYLOADS and the 83 pattern ids are an internal surface on their
side, with no README/CHANGELOG/docs statement promising id or payload
stability. Their gate is their own test suite, not a promise to this
repository. Their stated position: a future payload change diverges the
pin and should be re-pinned, not treated as a broken contract.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QJTZgfnjsaN14ti5HXiKhQ
The corpus was blocked on a decision nobody had to take. The 13 divergent
lexicon patterns were measured on witness inputs -- an attribute run padded
past 256 characters, an interior '<', an unclosed <script> -- and the corpus
payloads contain none of those shapes. Run through both runtimes' public
entry points, all 83 patterns produce identical lexicon finding sets, the 13
included. No winner picked, because the question was never reachable from
these inputs.
Measured at each runtime's entry point (scanForInjection() at b0de0ca,
scan_output(source=OUTPUT) at 0bf0729), never at a rebuilt regex table --
the layer mistake the divergence document already had to retract once.
- conformance/<case>/{input.txt,expected.json} x83, plus manifest.json
- spec/conformance-corpus.md, normative: bytes not text, id-only findings,
exact-within-scope, and observed_out_of_scope as evidence not expectation
Verified by a harness that does not share the generator's knowledge: reads
only the case directories, re-runs both runtimes, checks every field
including digests -- 83 cases, 0 failures. Severity agrees with what commons
publishes 83/83. Deleting the middle third of each input breaks 76 of 83
expectations; the 7 survivors are the shortest payloads, a weak mutation
rather than a weak fixture, and are recorded as such.
Scope is 83 and not 94 for a different reason than expected: the 11
non-lexicon convertible cases have no ratified cross-runtime finding id, and
writing them would mint a contract unilaterally in the same stroke as the
tag. Named in manifest.json under scope_planned.
Docs corrected in place rather than edited away: extraction-plan and
lexicon-port-divergence both claimed the 13 blocked the corpus.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WhXDL82FRrQWedEmUg12Pj
