The schema was seeded from sarif-formatter.mjs, which consumes findings.
That could only ever establish a lower bound on the property set, so
additionalProperties had to stay open. The producer is now readable:
finding() in scanners/lib/output.mjs line 32, at b0de0ca. It returns an
object literal with exactly ten keys and no spread, so the set is complete
and the schema closes.
Added: id and evidence, the two keys a consumer-side reading could not see.
id gets its own definition, DS-<prefix>-<counter>, with pattern
^DS-[A-Za-z]+-[0-9]{3,} - the {3,} because padStart(3) is a minimum, so a
run past 999 findings produces four digits. It comes from a process-global
counter and is stable neither across runs nor across processes; the
definition says so before someone keys on it.
Nullability is evidence now, not convention. Five keys are emitted as null
rather than omitted, so a serialised finding always carries all ten. The
four assigned straight from opts are the exception: omit description and
the key is undefined and disappears from the JSON. Reproduced against the
real producer - ten keys in memory, nine serialised.
owasp is a string, not an array, and not one code. Multiple codes are
joined with ", ". Measured across the seed runtime: 31 distinct values over
157 sites, 13 multi-code, and four that mix taxonomies inside a single
value with no discriminator. That has a consequence nobody had written
down: sarif-formatter builds tags: [f.owasp], so "LLM06, ASI02" becomes ONE
tag with a comma in it and nothing filtering on LLM06 matches. Reproduced
end to end through the real finding() and toSARIF(), logged as
known_lossiness.owasp-tag-not-split. It is consumer behaviour, not data, so
it is reported rather than fixed here.
The JSONL profile is set to "not applicable" rather than "unspecified".
The distinction carries weight: unspecified would assert a profile exists
and has merely not been written down. There is no finding-JSONL - findings
are emitted only inside one JSON envelope. The single module that does
write JSONL, audit-trail.mjs, writes audit events under a different schema
where owasp is an ARRAY. Same field name, different type, same repository.
The profile records that trap instead of leaving a TODO.
Verified: valid Draft 2020-12, every finding built by the real producer
validates, and four negative controls are rejected.
One new open question left unpatched: the producer's JSDoc lists seventeen
scanner prefixes including IDE, while all four maps in owasp-map.json are
keyed on sixteen without it. An IDE finding has no taxonomy mapping
anywhere. Adding the key would be inventing detection data.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SNMcqrfNyoLRQ7qXUFZnb9
13 KiB
Changelog
All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.
The format is based on Keep a Changelog, and this project adheres to Semantic Versioning.
Versioning note: the repository tag versions the contract (file set, key names,
case ids, disposition semantics). Each JSON file additionally carries its own
"version" field, bumped when that file changes.
[Unreleased]
Initial extraction, in progress. Runtime-neutral detection data and the finding contract,
extracted from the llm-security Node implementation and a Python guard without behaviour
change. Not yet tagged — see Not included below.
Added
schema/finding.schema.json— the finding contract plus the SARIF output profile. Normative. Closed against the producer in 0.2.0; the JSONL profile isnot applicable.signatures/active-content.json— the EchoLeak class (CVE-2025-32711): 17 patterns, severities, opacity floors and pass order, from the Python guard.lexicon/injection-lexicon.json— 83 prompt-injection patterns in four families (21 critical, 32 high, 22 medium, 8 hybrid).codepoints/carriers.json— six carrier tables: zero-width characters, the Unicode Tags block, the Supplementary Private Use Areas, BIDI controls, the Cyrillic presence set and the 28-entry fold-to-Latin homoglyph map.signatures/secret-egress.json— the 18 fixed credential and token shapes. Array order is normative.mapping/owasp-map.json— four taxonomy maps (LLM, ASI, AST, MCP) over one shared 16-prefix key set.calibration/calibration.json— risk-score tier constants, verdict thresholds, risk-band cutoffs, posture grade thresholds.
Verification
Every file above except calibration.json was proven rather than transcribed: the data was
rebuilt from the commons JSON alone and diffed against the source implementation. Each
file records its own result and its own limits.
calibration/calibration.json carries verified: false. Its source arrived as a prose
summary rather than as code, so no differential check was possible, and the file names the
checks that were not run instead of attaching a caveat to a pass.
docs/lexicon-port-divergence.md— informative. A differential comparison of the two ports ofinjection-patterns.mjs(this repository's and the Python guard's): 83/83 patterns correspond, 64 are byte-identical, 6 differ only by escaping and are proven equivalent, and 13 behave differently, with a witness input for each and misses on both sides. The cause is two different ReDoS mitigations of one table. No data file was changed — behaviour preservation holds and the finding is reported to the owning repositories.
Changed
-
schema/finding.schema.json0.1.0 → 0.2.0 — the schema is closed. It was seeded fromsarif-formatter.mjs, which consumes findings, so its property list could only ever be a lower bound andadditionalPropertieshad to stay open. The producer is now known —finding()inscanners/lib/output.mjs, line 32 — and it returns an object literal with exactly ten keys and no spread:id,scanner,severity,title,description,file,line,evidence,owasp,recommendation.additionalPropertiesisfalse, and the two keys the old schema never knew about (id,evidence) are added.idgets its own definition:DS-<prefix>-<counter>, pattern^DS-[A-Za-z]+-[0-9]{3,}$. The{3,}is deliberate —padStart(3, '0')is a minimum, so a run emitting more than 999 findings produces four digits. The id comes from a process-global counter, so it is stable neither across runs nor across processes, and the definition says so before someone keys on it.Nullability is now evidence rather than convention. Five keys are emitted as
nullrather than omitted (opts.x || null), so a serialised finding always carries all ten. The exception is the four assigned straight fromopts: omitdescriptionand the key isundefinedand vanishes from the JSON. Verified by calling the real producer — ten keys in memory, nine after serialisation.owaspis a string, not an array, and not one code. Multiple codes are joined with,. Measured across the seed runtime: 31 distinct values over 157 emission sites, 13 of them multi-code, and four mix taxonomies inside a single value (LLM06, ASI02and friends) with no discriminator saying which is which. That sharpens the edition problemmapping/owasp-map.jsonalready records, and it has a consequence nobody had written down:sarif-formatter.mjsbuildstags: [f.owasp], so a finding anchored to two taxonomies produces one SARIF tag with a comma in it. Nothing filtering onLLM06will match. Reproduced end to end through the realfinding()andtoSARIF(), and logged asknown_lossiness.owasp-tag-not-split— consumer behaviour inllm-security, not data, so it is reported rather than fixed here.The JSONL profile is
not applicable, notunspecified— the distinction is the point.unspecifiedwould claim a profile exists and merely has not been written down. No finding-JSONL exists: findings are emitted only inside a single JSON envelope (output.mjs:140). The one module that does write JSONL,audit-trail.mjs, writes audit events under a different schema — whereowaspis an array. Same field name, different type, same repository. A consumer reading both through one code path will be wrong about one of them, so the profile records the trap instead of leaving a TODO.Verified: the schema is valid Draft 2020-12, every finding built by the real producer validates against it, and four negative controls (extra property, missing
id, malformedid, unknown severity) are all rejected.One new open question, unpatched by design: the producer's JSDoc lists seventeen scanner prefixes including
IDE, while all four maps inmapping/owasp-map.jsonare keyed on sixteen without it. AnIDEfinding has no taxonomy mapping in any map. Adding the key would be inventing detection data. -
lexicon/injection-lexicon.json0.4.0 → 0.5.0 — the last null in the file is filled and the id space is ratified. Two blockers close, no detection data moves.families[hybrid].severitywasnull, deliberately, because the seed dump did not supply it. It ishigh— and the interesting part is where that is written. The hybrid family has no severity field anywhere; the engine assigns one by pushingHYBRID_PATTERNSmatches straight into thehighbucket atinjection-patterns.mjs:274-281. Both this repository and the Python guard had first looked inseverity.mjs, which contains no injection-family severity at all. The guard's port holds the right value behind that wrong citation, soseverity_provenance.not_fromrecords the miss explicitly: a wrong citation to a right value is the harder defect to catch later.pattern_id_space.not_yet_confirmedis replaced byratification. Both seeding runtimes agreed on 2026-08-09 —llm-securityratified the 0.2.0 proposal as-is and treats an id change as breaking on the same terms, and the guard confirmed the space its own port supplied.idis now a cross-runtime contract, which is whatconformance/was waiting on to be able to name a finding.alias_evidence.llm_securityis sharpened rather than upgraded. All 83 alias strings were confirmed equal to the module'slabelfield, in order — so the alias is certainly the pattern's name in the table. It is still not established that a finding carries it: the producer isoutput.mjs:finding(), which emitstitleand has nolabelkey at all. Verified at table level, one level short of where it would matter. Match onid. -
lexicon/injection-lexicon.json0.3.0 → 0.4.0 — verified against the source module instead of against the dump it was transcribed from, and two false provenance claims retracted. The source is now pinned:b0de0caon the public remote, imported in Node and compared entry by entry onsource,flagsandlabel.The result is 83/83 byte-identical to source, which is not what the file previously claimed. It said two patterns had been rewritten from raw code points into
\uXXXXescapes; the module already writes them escaped, so nothing had been rewritten. The stored pattern text was right the whole time — only the account of where it came from was wrong. The dump had rendered the module's escapes as the characters they denote, and this repository re-escaped them, arriving at the correct bytes by way of an incorrect story.The same inversion ran the other way in
multi-lang:french, which carried the class spelled with a raw accented Latinewhere the module writes it as the escape\u00e9inside the same character class. That was the one pattern of 83 not byte-identical to source, and it is corrected. The two spellings are the same regular expression — verified in Node bare and underu, and in Pythonre, over accented, unaccented, uppercase and non-matching French input, with identical match offsets — so no behaviour moved. No pattern in the file contains a non-ASCII byte now, matching the module, whose regex literals are pure ASCII throughout.Structurally:
normalisationsis now[]with anormalisations_note, matching the convention already used insignatures/secret-egress.json, and a newsource_fidelityblock carries the counts, the method, the verified class membership, and both retractions in full. Retracted claims are recorded rather than deleted — the earlier equivalence evidence (692 Node comparisons, 236 Python) remains true, it is simply no longer load-bearing. -
lexicon/injection-lexicon.json0.2.0 → 0.3.0 — the two aliases are no longer presented as equally backed.pattern_id_space.alias_evidencenow records each one separately:llm_ingestion_guardis verified (the guard's coverage matrix asserts on that exact string, so it is demonstrably what a guard finding carries), whilellm_securityis not — it is the pattern table's own name, and the finding producer was never supplied, with the known Node finding shape usingtitlerather thanlabel. Averaging the two into one file-level claim would have repeated the defect this repository corrects per-table elsewhere.Also:
normalisations[].affectsnow keys onidwith the prose names kept beside it asaffects_labels. An internal cross-reference on label was a second identity space inside the file the id was added to unify. -
lexicon/injection-lexicon.json0.1.0 → 0.2.0 — every pattern gains a commons-ownedidand analiasesobject naming what each seeding runtime calls it, plus a top-levelpattern_id_spaceblock explaining the field. This exists because aconformance/fixture has to name a finding and the two runtimes do not name the same pattern the same way.The id was adopted verbatim from the guard's port, which already carried both names, rather than invented here. Matching was by
label↔descwith em-dash normalised to hyphen: 83/83, one-to-one, ids unique.No detection data moved. Labels, patterns and flags are byte-identical in sequence, no
flagskey was invented (78 before, 78 after), and stripping the three new fields reproduces the previous committed file byte for byte — 23 566 bytes, identical. All 83 patterns still compile in Node bare and underu(166/166) and in Pythonre(83/83).Neither
llm-securitynor the guard has ratified this id space yet; both were asked by coord on 2026-08-09, and the file says so rather than implying agreement.
Not included
signatures/malware-signatures.json— seed data not yet delivered.spec/decode-pipeline.md— needs the decode implementation. A normative spec inferred from a data dump would be worse than an absent one.conformance/— still absent, with half the blocker cleared. 105 of the guard's 134 coverage cases are convertible to staticinput.txt/expected.json; the other 29 assert a runtime's API surface, which this repository does not own. Findings can now be named (seepattern_id_spaceabove), but 13 patterns still have no agreed expected behaviour — the two ports genuinely differ on them — so those fixtures cannot be authored until the owning repositories answer.
These are named in the README as planned rather than linked, so nothing in the repository points at a file that does not exist.