Two things the file was waiting on arrived, and both are now data rather than open questions. families[hybrid].severity was null by design - the seed dump supplied the array but not the severity. It is "high". The value is not stored anywhere as a field: the engine assigns it by pushing HYBRID_PATTERNS matches straight into the high bucket at injection-patterns.mjs:274-281, under the comment "Hybrid patterns are HIGH severity (v5.0 S6)". severity_provenance names the file it is NOT in. Both this repository and the Python guard first looked in severity.mjs, which contains no injection- family severity at all - grep it for any of the four pattern constants and you get nothing. The guard's port carries the right value while citing that file, so a consumer following its citation finds no answer. A wrong citation to a right value survives review in a way a wrong value does not, so it is recorded rather than quietly fixed. pattern_id_space.not_yet_confirmed is replaced by a ratification block. Both seeding runtimes agreed on 2026-08-09: llm-security ratified the 0.2.0 proposal as-is and treats an id change as breaking on the same terms, and the guard confirmed the space its own port supplied. The id is a cross-runtime contract now, which is what conformance/ needed before a fixture could name a finding at all. alias_evidence.llm_security is sharpened, not upgraded. All 83 alias strings were confirmed equal to the module's label field in array order, so the alias is certainly the pattern's name in the table. It is still not established that a FINDING carries it: output.mjs:finding() emits title and has no label key. Verified at table level, one level short of where it would matter. No detection data moved: all 83 patterns still byte-identical to the module at b0de0ca, and no pattern entry differs from HEAD. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SNMcqrfNyoLRQ7qXUFZnb9
9.2 KiB
Changelog
All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.
The format is based on Keep a Changelog, and this project adheres to Semantic Versioning.
Versioning note: the repository tag versions the contract (file set, key names,
case ids, disposition semantics). Each JSON file additionally carries its own
"version" field, bumped when that file changes.
[Unreleased]
Initial extraction, in progress. Runtime-neutral detection data and the finding contract,
extracted from the llm-security Node implementation and a Python guard without behaviour
change. Not yet tagged — see Not included below.
Added
schema/finding.schema.json— the finding contract plus the SARIF output profile. Normative. The JSONL profile is deliberately leftunspecified.signatures/active-content.json— the EchoLeak class (CVE-2025-32711): 17 patterns, severities, opacity floors and pass order, from the Python guard.lexicon/injection-lexicon.json— 83 prompt-injection patterns in four families (21 critical, 32 high, 22 medium, 8 hybrid).codepoints/carriers.json— six carrier tables: zero-width characters, the Unicode Tags block, the Supplementary Private Use Areas, BIDI controls, the Cyrillic presence set and the 28-entry fold-to-Latin homoglyph map.signatures/secret-egress.json— the 18 fixed credential and token shapes. Array order is normative.mapping/owasp-map.json— four taxonomy maps (LLM, ASI, AST, MCP) over one shared 16-prefix key set.calibration/calibration.json— risk-score tier constants, verdict thresholds, risk-band cutoffs, posture grade thresholds.
Verification
Every file above except calibration.json was proven rather than transcribed: the data was
rebuilt from the commons JSON alone and diffed against the source implementation. Each
file records its own result and its own limits.
calibration/calibration.json carries verified: false. Its source arrived as a prose
summary rather than as code, so no differential check was possible, and the file names the
checks that were not run instead of attaching a caveat to a pass.
docs/lexicon-port-divergence.md— informative. A differential comparison of the two ports ofinjection-patterns.mjs(this repository's and the Python guard's): 83/83 patterns correspond, 64 are byte-identical, 6 differ only by escaping and are proven equivalent, and 13 behave differently, with a witness input for each and misses on both sides. The cause is two different ReDoS mitigations of one table. No data file was changed — behaviour preservation holds and the finding is reported to the owning repositories.
Changed
-
lexicon/injection-lexicon.json0.4.0 → 0.5.0 — the last null in the file is filled and the id space is ratified. Two blockers close, no detection data moves.families[hybrid].severitywasnull, deliberately, because the seed dump did not supply it. It ishigh— and the interesting part is where that is written. The hybrid family has no severity field anywhere; the engine assigns one by pushingHYBRID_PATTERNSmatches straight into thehighbucket atinjection-patterns.mjs:274-281. Both this repository and the Python guard had first looked inseverity.mjs, which contains no injection-family severity at all. The guard's port holds the right value behind that wrong citation, soseverity_provenance.not_fromrecords the miss explicitly: a wrong citation to a right value is the harder defect to catch later.pattern_id_space.not_yet_confirmedis replaced byratification. Both seeding runtimes agreed on 2026-08-09 —llm-securityratified the 0.2.0 proposal as-is and treats an id change as breaking on the same terms, and the guard confirmed the space its own port supplied.idis now a cross-runtime contract, which is whatconformance/was waiting on to be able to name a finding.alias_evidence.llm_securityis sharpened rather than upgraded. All 83 alias strings were confirmed equal to the module'slabelfield, in order — so the alias is certainly the pattern's name in the table. It is still not established that a finding carries it: the producer isoutput.mjs:finding(), which emitstitleand has nolabelkey at all. Verified at table level, one level short of where it would matter. Match onid. -
lexicon/injection-lexicon.json0.3.0 → 0.4.0 — verified against the source module instead of against the dump it was transcribed from, and two false provenance claims retracted. The source is now pinned:b0de0caon the public remote, imported in Node and compared entry by entry onsource,flagsandlabel.The result is 83/83 byte-identical to source, which is not what the file previously claimed. It said two patterns had been rewritten from raw code points into
\uXXXXescapes; the module already writes them escaped, so nothing had been rewritten. The stored pattern text was right the whole time — only the account of where it came from was wrong. The dump had rendered the module's escapes as the characters they denote, and this repository re-escaped them, arriving at the correct bytes by way of an incorrect story.The same inversion ran the other way in
multi-lang:french, which carried the class spelled with a raw accented Latinewhere the module writes it as the escape\u00e9inside the same character class. That was the one pattern of 83 not byte-identical to source, and it is corrected. The two spellings are the same regular expression — verified in Node bare and underu, and in Pythonre, over accented, unaccented, uppercase and non-matching French input, with identical match offsets — so no behaviour moved. No pattern in the file contains a non-ASCII byte now, matching the module, whose regex literals are pure ASCII throughout.Structurally:
normalisationsis now[]with anormalisations_note, matching the convention already used insignatures/secret-egress.json, and a newsource_fidelityblock carries the counts, the method, the verified class membership, and both retractions in full. Retracted claims are recorded rather than deleted — the earlier equivalence evidence (692 Node comparisons, 236 Python) remains true, it is simply no longer load-bearing. -
lexicon/injection-lexicon.json0.2.0 → 0.3.0 — the two aliases are no longer presented as equally backed.pattern_id_space.alias_evidencenow records each one separately:llm_ingestion_guardis verified (the guard's coverage matrix asserts on that exact string, so it is demonstrably what a guard finding carries), whilellm_securityis not — it is the pattern table's own name, and the finding producer was never supplied, with the known Node finding shape usingtitlerather thanlabel. Averaging the two into one file-level claim would have repeated the defect this repository corrects per-table elsewhere.Also:
normalisations[].affectsnow keys onidwith the prose names kept beside it asaffects_labels. An internal cross-reference on label was a second identity space inside the file the id was added to unify. -
lexicon/injection-lexicon.json0.1.0 → 0.2.0 — every pattern gains a commons-ownedidand analiasesobject naming what each seeding runtime calls it, plus a top-levelpattern_id_spaceblock explaining the field. This exists because aconformance/fixture has to name a finding and the two runtimes do not name the same pattern the same way.The id was adopted verbatim from the guard's port, which already carried both names, rather than invented here. Matching was by
label↔descwith em-dash normalised to hyphen: 83/83, one-to-one, ids unique.No detection data moved. Labels, patterns and flags are byte-identical in sequence, no
flagskey was invented (78 before, 78 after), and stripping the three new fields reproduces the previous committed file byte for byte — 23 566 bytes, identical. All 83 patterns still compile in Node bare and underu(166/166) and in Pythonre(83/83).Neither
llm-securitynor the guard has ratified this id space yet; both were asked by coord on 2026-08-09, and the file says so rather than implying agreement.
Not included
signatures/malware-signatures.json— seed data not yet delivered.spec/decode-pipeline.md— needs the decode implementation. A normative spec inferred from a data dump would be worse than an absent one.conformance/— still absent, with half the blocker cleared. 105 of the guard's 134 coverage cases are convertible to staticinput.txt/expected.json; the other 29 assert a runtime's API surface, which this repository does not own. Findings can now be named (seepattern_id_spaceabove), but 13 patterns still have no agreed expected behaviour — the two ports genuinely differ on them — so those fixtures cannot be authored until the owning repositories answer.
These are named in the README as planned rather than linked, so nothing in the repository points at a file that does not exist.