llm-security/commands/pre-deploy.md
Kjell Tore Guttormsen f153f969a0 feat(ultraplan-local): v1.6.0 — /ultraresearch-local deep research command
Add /ultraresearch-local for structured research combining local codebase
analysis with external knowledge via parallel agent swarms. Produces research
briefs with triangulation, confidence ratings, and source quality assessment.

New command: /ultraresearch-local with modes --quick, --local, --external, --fg.
New agents: research-orchestrator (opus), docs-researcher, community-researcher,
security-researcher, contrarian-researcher, gemini-bridge (all sonnet).
New template: research-brief-template.md.

Integration: --research flag in /ultraplan-local accepts pre-built research
briefs (up to 3), enriches the interview and exploration phases. Planning
orchestrator cross-references brief findings during synthesis.

Design principle: Context Engineering — right information to right agent at
right time. Research briefs are structured artifacts in the pipeline:
ultraresearch → brief → ultraplan --research → plan → ultraexecute.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-08 08:58:35 +02:00

5 KiB

name description allowed-tools model
security:pre-deploy Pre-deployment security checklist — verify enterprise controls, compliance, and production readiness Read, Glob, Grep, AskUserQuestion sonnet

/security pre-deploy

Running pre-deployment security checklist...

Automated Checks

Run each check and record status (PASS / FAIL / WARN / N/A).

1 — Deny-first permissions

Read .claude/settings.json and ~/.claude/settings.json. Look for "permissions" block with a deny-first or allowlist-only policy (e.g., "defaultMode": "allowList" or explicit deny rules). Status: PASS if deny-first found, WARN if not configured, FAIL if allow-all detected.

2 — Secrets hook active

Read hooks/hooks.json (or .claude/hooks.json). Check for a PreToolUse hook matching Edit|Write that references pre-edit-secrets. Status: PASS if found, FAIL if absent.

3 — Path guard active

Same hooks.json or global ~/.claude/settings.json hooks. Check for a PreToolUse hook matching Write or Edit|Write that references pre-write-pathguard. Status: PASS if found locally or globally, FAIL if absent in both.

4 — Destructive command guard

Same hooks.json. Check for a PreToolUse hook matching Bash that references pre-bash-destructive or equivalent firewall script. Status: PASS if found, WARN if absent.

5 — MCP servers verified

Read .mcp.json if it exists. For each server listed, check whether it is a known/trusted server (Linear, MS Learn, Tavily, GitHub, etc.) vs. unknown third-party. Flag any unknown servers. Status: PASS if all known, WARN if unknown servers present, N/A if no .mcp.json.

6 — No hardcoded secrets

Grep source files (excluding node_modules, .git, *.md) for common secret patterns: API_KEY, api_key, secret, password, token, bearer, sk-, -----BEGIN. Status: PASS if no hits, FAIL if hits found.

7 — .gitignore covers secrets

Read .gitignore. Check for entries covering .env, .env.*, credentials, *.key, *.pem, secrets*. Status: PASS if at least 3 of these patterns present, WARN if partial, FAIL if absent.

8 — CLAUDE.md has security section

Read CLAUDE.md. Check for a section or heading mentioning security, secrets, hooks, or permissions. Status: PASS if found, WARN if absent.

9 — Sandbox enabled

Read settings files. Check for "sandbox": true or sandbox-related configuration. Status: PASS if enabled, WARN if not configured (sandbox is opt-in).

10 — Audit logging configured

Check hooks.json for any Stop or PostToolUse hooks that write audit logs, or check settings for audit log paths. Status: PASS if found, WARN if absent.

Manual Verification

Ask the user these questions using AskUserQuestion (one at a time):

  1. "Is this project deployed under an Anthropic Enterprise plan? (SSO, SCIM, and audit logging are enterprise-only controls.)"
  2. "Has a DPIA (Data Protection Impact Assessment) been completed for this AI solution?"
  3. "Is there a documented incident response plan for AI failures or security incidents?"

Record answers and include in the report.

Report

Generate the report using templates/unified-report.md (ANALYSIS_TYPE: pre-deploy) as the format reference. Structure:

## Pre-Deployment Security Checklist

Passed: X/10 automated checks

| # | Check                    | Status | Detail                          |
|---|--------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
| 1 | Deny-first permissions   | ...    | ...                             |
| 2 | Secrets hook             | ...    | ...                             |
| 3 | Path guard               | ...    | ...                             |
| 4 | Destructive cmd guard    | ...    | ...                             |
| 5 | MCP servers verified     | ...    | ...                             |
| 6 | No hardcoded secrets     | ...    | ...                             |
| 7 | .gitignore covers secrets| ...    | ...                             |
| 8 | CLAUDE.md security docs  | ...    | ...                             |
| 9 | Sandbox enabled          | ...    | ...                             |
|10 | Audit logging            | ...    | ...                             |

## Manual Verification

- [ ] Enterprise plan: [user answer]
- [ ] DPIA completed: [user answer]
- [ ] Incident response plan: [user answer]

## Recommendations

[List FAIL items first, then WARN items, with specific remediation steps for each.]

Verdict

Map the pass count to a risk band and verdict:

Pass Count Risk Band Verdict
10/10 Low Ready for deployment — all automated checks passed.
8-9/10 Medium Nearly ready — address the remaining items before deploying.
6-7/10 High Significant gaps — resolve FAIL items before deployment.
4-5/10 Critical Not ready — major security gaps. Immediate remediation needed.
0-3/10 Extreme Critical risk — deployment blocked until fundamental controls are in place.

State the verdict and risk band clearly at the end of the report.