Oekt 17 found the class on four named files. This sweep ENUMERATES it: 42 negative
substring assertions across 21 test files (STATE's "~34 across 23" was a premise --
measured, it is 42/21). Sixteen of them measured an absence without ever having
shown presence; all sixteen now carry a positive control asserting the searched-for
string PRESENT in the source artifact, in EXACTLY the form the negative looks for.
Files touched: test_costsim, test_loop, test_okf (3 sites), test_preflight,
test_run_entrance, test_s10_run_layer, test_sdk_version_guard, test_simulation
(2 sites), test_step1_expel, test_step5_refine, test_step7_async_loop,
test_step8_promotion, test_valuereport.
VALUE-PROOF (green-without / red-with, per the oekt-17 rule that a detach proof is
not a value proof). Seven source/fixture mutations, each making the negative vacuous:
M1 verdict fixture loses the realization signal VALUE-PROVEN
M2 decoy fixture loses its text VALUE-PROVEN
M3 renderer stops emitting typed section headings VALUE-PROVEN
M4 promotion stops writing the marker VALUE-PROVEN (pass 2)
M5 fold stops rendering the realization surface VALUE-PROVEN
M6 report stops labelling the cost section VALUE-PROVEN
M7 preflight stops importing the SDK VALUE-PROVEN
M4 needed pass 2: a PRECEDING assertion caught the same mutation, hiding the new
control behind it -- the oekt-17 lesson reproduced. The remaining nine controls are
vacuity guards (non-emptiness / form-presence) whose mutation would have to break
the source artificially; they are stated as guards, not claimed as value-proven.
MEASURED FINDING (test_loop): the FIRST-RUN-MARKER negative cannot be given a
positive control at all. Within a run only the CHECKER's critique is fed back --
the proposer's own prior reasoning crosses no prompt boundary, not even within a
run. So that negative holds trivially. Left in place with the limitation stated in
the test rather than dressed up as a controlled seam; the CRITIQUE negative beside
it IS controlled and is the real seam.
Mutations were in-place on src/ and shared/ with original bytes restored and
sha-verified; git status clean before and after. Suite 688 -> 688 (assertions added
inside existing tests, no new test cases). ruff + mypy --strict green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017Vc5PmZGjwuJypdhzKnJa5
Spec §3 steps 2–5 + §8, TDD-ed offline (scripted, honesty-marked stand-in):
- budget.py: BudgetMeter over TerminationContract — provider-reported usage
only (missing usage fails closed), structured BudgetExceeded stop event.
- loop.py: ModelClient protocol; blind parse-retry generation (never silent
repair); round-capped debate with turn safety net and mandated VERDICT
line; opt-in-reject checker gate (explicit REJECT overrides a validated
outcome, validator rejection stands); most-recent-reason-verbatim informed
refinement under max_attempts; validator_decision stamped BEFORE override,
checker_decision as its own result field (§9, never conflated).
- 45 new tests (121 total, no API key); four detach proofs run RED and
reverted green: checker override, informed block, surfaced checker output,
stamp-before-override.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QdSfQdND84oeq2mbjueLTS
