Stress round 6 validated three falsification arms, and every validated
approach rested only on run-level declarations nobody can attribute to one
approach. declare_requirement now takes a required approach_id (a mandate
id or own-proposal; an unknown id is refused naming the valid ones), and a
ValidatedProposal whose approach has neither a mandate requirement nor a
declaration under its own id becomes validator.Unsupported - a Rejection
subclass carrying the validator's own ruling, reported as `unsupported` in
coverage, the outcome artefact, the settlement and the judge, and never
counted or summed. The rule is active whenever the debate held the
declaration tool, the micro base included; the road and pre-pass paths are
untouched. Declaration quality is not judged, so the rule can be satisfied
by declaring any document the run read.
The v1 gate's row 6 probes pass; its artefact half reads IKKE MÅLT because
stress round 6 predates approach-addressed declarations, and IKKE MÅLT is
never green - it fails the exit code.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
One command says how far the repo is from v1, row by row, with an exit
code: rounds with a real domain expert 0/3, traced measurable change 0/3,
feedback types with a way in and an action 3/8 (1, 3, 7), round 3 report
kept - none, MAF points with a green type pointer 0/8 (list not approved),
validated without the approach's own declaration 10/10 in stress round 6,
and `named` 1/20 as a diagnosis that never moves the exit code.
The gate defines the contract (a fixed rounds directory, gitignored by
default), not the generator. Rows 3 and 6 run named tests with
--runxfail; the red probes are xfail(strict=True) so the suite stays green
while the gap is real. No product code changed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
