portfolio-optimiser/tests/test_v1_probes.py
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 938a1ca30e feat(row6): a proposal whose approach declared no requirement is unsupported
Stress round 6 validated three falsification arms, and every validated
approach rested only on run-level declarations nobody can attribute to one
approach. declare_requirement now takes a required approach_id (a mandate
id or own-proposal; an unknown id is refused naming the valid ones), and a
ValidatedProposal whose approach has neither a mandate requirement nor a
declaration under its own id becomes validator.Unsupported - a Rejection
subclass carrying the validator's own ruling, reported as `unsupported` in
coverage, the outcome artefact, the settlement and the judge, and never
counted or summed. The rule is active whenever the debate held the
declaration tool, the micro base included; the road and pre-pass paths are
untouched. Declaration quality is not judged, so the rule can be satisfied
by declaring any document the run read.

The v1 gate's row 6 probes pass; its artefact half reads IKKE MÅLT because
stress round 6 predates approach-addressed declarations, and IKKE MÅLT is
never green - it fails the exit code.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-17 16:40:54 +02:00

174 lines
7.2 KiB
Python

"""v1 gate probes — the named tests the v1 gate (``python -m portfolio_optimiser.evals.v1_gate``)
runs to decide two of its rows. Every test here that is RED today carries
``xfail(strict=True)``, so the ordinary suite stays green while the gap is real, and the gate runs
the file with ``--runxfail`` so the gap shows as red there. ``strict`` is the other half: the day a
capability makes one of these pass, the suite goes RED on the XPASS until the marker is removed —
a closed gap cannot stay labelled open.
**Row 3 (feedback types with a way in AND an action).** Types 1, 3 and 7 are proven by EXISTING
tests elsewhere in the suite (registered by node id in ``evals/v1_gate.json``). The five types with
no complete surface (2, 4, 5, 6, 8) get a probe here that is red BECAUSE the surface is missing,
never a missing test. Each probe measures the absence (the CLI's own ``--help``); if a matching
option appears it STILL fails, naming the option — "partial is no", and a door with no observed
action is exactly partial. Such a probe goes green only when it is rewritten to drive the new door
and observe what it does.
**Row 6 (a validated proposal whose approach declared no requirement).** Two probes against the
real ``run_project`` on the shipped micro base, where the debate holds ``declare_requirement``:
no declaration anywhere, and a declaration filed for ANOTHER approach (the run's own proposal).
Neither may leave ``a1`` validated — a declaration counts only under its own approach's id.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import contextlib
import io
import json
import re
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any
import pytest
from portfolio_optimiser import okf, run
from portfolio_optimiser.mandate import Approach, Mandate
from portfolio_optimiser.run import run_project
from portfolio_optimiser.simulation import scripted_factory
from portfolio_optimiser.verdicts import VerdictStore
_BUNDLE = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "shared" / "examples" / "bygg-energi-mikro"
_BASE_ID = "bygg-energi-mikro"
_PID = "BYGG-KONTOR-NORD"
_VALID_REPLY = (
'{"measure":"LED-retrofit av kontorbelysning","affected_items":'
'[{"code":"ENERGI-TOTAL-EL","quantity":300000,"unit_cost":1.0}],"claimed_saving_nok":30000}'
)
_CHECKER_REPLY = "Reasoning holds.\nVERDICT: APPROVE"
_NO_SURFACE = "v1 probe: no surface"
_PARTIAL = "v1 probe: surface without an observed action"
def _cli_options() -> set[str]:
"""Every option string the CLI's own ``--help`` prints — the surface, measured."""
buffer = io.StringIO()
with contextlib.redirect_stdout(buffer), pytest.raises(SystemExit):
run.main(["--help"])
return set(re.findall(r"--[a-z][a-z-]*", buffer.getvalue()))
def _surface_or_fail(type_no: int, what: str, keywords: tuple[str, ...]) -> None:
hits = sorted(o for o in _cli_options() if any(k in o for k in keywords))
if not hits:
pytest.fail(f"{_NO_SURFACE}: type {type_no} ({what}) — no CLI option matches {keywords}")
pytest.fail(
f"{_PARTIAL}: type {type_no} ({what}) — {hits} appeared; rewrite this probe to drive it "
"and observe the action"
)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Row 3 — the five types without a complete surface
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@pytest.mark.xfail(strict=True, reason="type 2: no typed removal; only revise free text")
def test_type_2_remove_a_direction_has_a_typed_door() -> None:
_surface_or_fail(2, "take a direction away", ("drop", "remove", "exclude", "withdraw"))
@pytest.mark.xfail(strict=True, reason="type 4: no surface relaxes a requirement")
def test_type_4_relax_a_requirement_has_a_door() -> None:
_surface_or_fail(4, "relax a requirement", ("relax", "waive", "loosen"))
@pytest.mark.xfail(strict=True, reason="type 5: concept graph edits have no CLI door")
def test_type_5_edit_the_concept_graph_has_a_door() -> None:
_surface_or_fail(5, "edit the concept graph", ("promote", "concept", "graph"))
@pytest.mark.xfail(strict=True, reason="type 6: no skills flag")
def test_type_6_skills_per_analysis_has_a_door() -> None:
_surface_or_fail(6, "skills per analysis", ("skill",))
@pytest.mark.xfail(strict=True, reason="type 8: no door for inline context such as meeting notes")
def test_type_8_inline_context_has_a_door() -> None:
_surface_or_fail(8, "inline context", ("note", "minutes", "inline", "attach"))
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Row 6 — a validated proposal must rest on a declaration its approach made
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
def _mandate() -> Mandate:
return Mandate(
objective="Kutt energikostnad",
approaches=(Approach(id="a1", label="LED-retrofit", description="expert's reason"),),
)
async def _statuses(script: dict[str, Any], tmp_path: Path, base: Path) -> dict[str, str]:
result = await run_project(
_PID,
"local",
docs_dir=str(base),
bundle_dir=str(base),
store=VerdictStore(verdicts=[]),
client_factory=scripted_factory(script, []),
mandate=_mandate(),
outbox_dir=str(tmp_path / "out"),
run_id="v1-row6",
)
return {row.id: row.status for row in result.coverage}
def _declaring_script(base: Path, approach_id: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
concepts = [f.name for f in okf.navigate_bundle(str(base)).context_files][:3]
return {
"proposer": [
*({"call": "read_file", "args": {"bundle_id": _BASE_ID, "path": n}} for n in concepts),
{
"call": "declare_requirement",
"args": {
"bundle_id": _BASE_ID,
"path": concepts[0],
"ref": "Krav 1.1-1",
"approach_id": approach_id,
},
},
_VALID_REPLY,
_VALID_REPLY,
_VALID_REPLY,
_VALID_REPLY,
],
"checker": _CHECKER_REPLY,
}
def _declared(tmp_path: Path) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
debate = json.loads((tmp_path / "out" / "v1-row6-debate.json").read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
return list(debate["requirements"])
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_row6_an_approach_that_declared_nothing_cannot_be_validated(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
base = _BUNDLE
statuses = await _statuses(
{"proposer": _VALID_REPLY, "checker": _CHECKER_REPLY}, tmp_path, base
)
assert _declared(tmp_path) == [] # precondition: nothing was declared anywhere
assert statuses["a1"] != "validated", "validated without any declared requirement"
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_row6_a_run_level_declaration_does_not_stand_in_for_the_approach(
tmp_path: Path,
) -> None:
"""The debate declares a requirement — but for the run's OWN proposal, not for ``a1``."""
base = _BUNDLE
statuses = await _statuses(_declaring_script(base, "own-proposal"), tmp_path, base)
declared = _declared(tmp_path)
assert [d.get("approach_id") for d in declared] == ["own-proposal"] # precondition
assert statuses["a1"] != "validated", "validated on a declaration the approach never made"