D2b: llms.txt i rota - H1, blockquote, EN startkommando byte-identisk med README-ens forste kodeblokk (verifisert med diff), Docs- og Optional-seksjoner med relative fillenker. Loser README-ens tre konkurrerende startverb ved a velge den dokumenterte veien. Minimal med vilje: llms.txt er en konvensjon, ikke en ratifisert standard. Begrunnes IKKE med crawlere - leseren er en KI-agent som allerede star i repoet. D6: SECURITY.md sin kontaktadresse hello@ -> security@fromaitochitta.com. Kun sikkerhetskontakten; hello@ i CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md star urort (riktig for alt annet). shared/SECURITY.md er urort - shared/ er pull-only subtree fra commons og eies der. I samme okt (operator-ja 21.08): docs/extending.md sa "no bundled example ships a cost-baseline.json (checked)". Usant siden 09.08 - MALT: veglys-fv-soer og tunnel-hauglia shipper begge fila. Setningen peker na pa den shippede fila som formreferanse og gjengir ir.CostBaseline korrekt (project_id + items-map). llms.txt ligger utenfor _LIVE_DOCS-gaten (den skanner README.md + docs/**/*.md), verifisert i testfila - ingen ny doc-klassifisering kreves. Handover-gatens _REQUIRED_MEMBERS er en tilstedevaerelses-sjekk, ikke en uttommende liste. 874 passed / 5 skipped, uendret. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DA6HAF8HFQxGYC2h6ypRQe
65 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
# Security Policy
|
|
|
|
## Reporting a Vulnerability
|
|
|
|
We take security seriously. If you discover a security vulnerability, please report it responsibly.
|
|
|
|
**Please do NOT report security vulnerabilities through public issues.**
|
|
|
|
### How to Report
|
|
|
|
Email: security@fromaitochitta.com
|
|
|
|
Include:
|
|
- Description of the vulnerability
|
|
- Steps to reproduce
|
|
- Potential impact
|
|
- Any suggested fixes (optional)
|
|
|
|
### What to Expect
|
|
|
|
- Acknowledgment within 48 hours
|
|
- Regular updates on progress
|
|
- Credit in the fix announcement (if desired)
|
|
|
|
## Supported Versions
|
|
|
|
Support follows the tags, not a calendar, and the table is deliberately version-free — a release
|
|
number written here would drift the moment the next tag lands.
|
|
|
|
| Version | Security fixes | What that means |
|
|
| ------- | -------------- | --------------- |
|
|
| Newest tagged release | :white_check_mark: best-effort | Fixes land on `main` and ship in the next tag |
|
|
| Every earlier tag | :x: | Earlier tags are never re-released. Upgrade, or fork and patch |
|
|
|
|
There is no long-term-support branch and no backporting. One maintainer, best-effort.
|
|
|
|
## Deprecation Notice Period
|
|
|
|
When a supported surface is removed, or a dependency stops receiving security fixes:
|
|
|
|
- The deprecation is announced in [`CHANGELOG.md`](CHANGELOG.md) under the release that introduces
|
|
it, and repeated in the release notes on the forge.
|
|
- **At least one minor release — and no fewer than 30 days — passes between that announcement and
|
|
the removal**, so anyone reading the changelog has a version to move to before the old one goes.
|
|
- **The stated exception is a security-critical removal.** If leaving a surface in place is itself
|
|
the risk, it goes in the next release and the changelog says plainly why the notice period was
|
|
not used. This has not happened so far.
|
|
|
|
This is a notice period, not an SLA. See the
|
|
[organisation governance](https://git.fromaitochitta.com/open/repo-standard/src/branch/main/GOVERNANCE.md)
|
|
for what this project does and does not promise.
|
|
|
|
## Security Best Practices
|
|
|
|
When using portfolio-optimiser:
|
|
- Keep dependencies updated
|
|
- Use environment variables for sensitive configuration — never commit secrets
|
|
- Prefer the local-only backend profile; the framework makes no silent network egress
|
|
- Follow the principle of least privilege for any data-source credentials
|
|
|
|
## Scope Note
|
|
|
|
portfolio-optimiser is a **technical framework**. Deploying organizations own their own data
|
|
protection, risk, and compliance assessments (DPIA/ROS). The framework ships technical
|
|
prerequisites (local-only mode, provenance, no silent egress) but makes no compliance guarantees.
|