Rule 7 (0.5.0) shipped an obligation on a format with four fields, none of
which could tell a question from a notice. Two consequences fell out of that
gap: the injection had to name both terminal states and prefer neither, and
coord-count.sh had to treat every unarchived file as a reply owed. The fifth
field closes both.
coord-send.sh --fyi writes reply-expected: no; omitting it writes yes. Absent
means expected, because every message already on disk lacks the field - so a
forgotten flag over-counts debt, which is visible, rather than creating debt
nobody sees. A reply is not a special case. A broadcast is always no: --reply-to
resolves inside the recipient's own mailbox and a broadcast never lands there,
so there is no reply path to promise.
coord-count.sh now prints TWO integers per mailbox, not one. Replacing pending
with debt was the obvious reading of "count debt rather than unarchived
messages" and it is wrong here: board.sh counts the same inbox files itself, so
a debt-only count would put two different numbers under one name with nothing to
reconcile them, and a mailbox holding only notices would read as empty while its
messages keep being re-injected.
The field is frontmatter and only frontmatter - a body line claiming
"reply-expected: no" at column 0 cannot silence a real debt, and a file without
valid frontmatter counts as owing a reply.
Section 20's wording changed because its stated reason expired, but its second
half matters more now, not less: the marking is a DECLARATION, not an
instruction. Without that clause one word in an untrusted message becomes a
lever that mints obligations in another repo.
coord-selftest 136 -> 151.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016iJoZVmU2guTEZcMghk88z
Reading IS delivery in this engine: coord-inbox.sh prints a broadcast and then
records it as seen. That made "what is pending elsewhere" unanswerable -- asking
the read path per repo would have consumed every repo's broadcast backlog as a
side effect, once, silently, and unrecoverably, since the seen set is delivery
history that retraction deliberately leaves alone.
coord-count.sh answers it by counting files and writing nothing: no seen set, no
.origin. It keys on MAILBOXES rather than repos -- it enumerates $COORD/* and
never scans a filesystem for checkouts -- so a repo without a mailbox is not
missing from the count, it is absent from the domain. Drained mailboxes are
omitted rather than reported as zero, because the question is "who is owed a
reply" and a list of zeroes answers a different one at every reader's expense.
The read path now closes with one aggregate line built from it. The case that
motivated this is the session whose own inbox is empty: it saw silence and
concluded "all clear" while mail sat unanswered everywhere else.
BREAKING (injection contract): the read path is no longer silent whenever THIS
repo has nothing pending. It is a silent no-op only when the whole mailbox is
empty. Coupling the line to having your own mail would have hidden it from its
only real audience. Three selftest assertions that used "no output at all" as a
proxy for "nothing was delivered" now assert the absence of the content itself,
which is what they always meant.
The line is an AGGREGATE of two integers, never a roster. A list of names would
reproduce other repos' situation inside this repo's injection -- the state
boundary the mailbox exists to respect -- and mailbox names are cross-repo
input. Two integers cannot carry anything that escapes the framing.
Its disclaimer is engine behavior, not politeness (Rule 7): the line lands
directly beneath "handle this inbox FIRST", and without it the numbers read as
an extension of that obligation and a session starts answering other repos'
mail. Pinned in selftest section 26 exactly as section 20 pins the priority
text. The hook's header drops "(unread messages)" for the same reason -- it
would now announce mail that does not exist.
Selftest 116 -> 136. Every new negative check is anchored to a positive
assertion in the same output, because a missing script makes "X is absent"
true by vacuity and would have gone green proving nothing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01U6EixQo6hpoRCVtiAXdnFs
