repo-mailbox/skills/coord-send/SKILL.md
Kjell Tore Guttormsen ec92c866c1 feat(engine)!: counting is not delivering, and an empty inbox is not all clear
Reading IS delivery in this engine: coord-inbox.sh prints a broadcast and then
records it as seen. That made "what is pending elsewhere" unanswerable -- asking
the read path per repo would have consumed every repo's broadcast backlog as a
side effect, once, silently, and unrecoverably, since the seen set is delivery
history that retraction deliberately leaves alone.

coord-count.sh answers it by counting files and writing nothing: no seen set, no
.origin. It keys on MAILBOXES rather than repos -- it enumerates $COORD/* and
never scans a filesystem for checkouts -- so a repo without a mailbox is not
missing from the count, it is absent from the domain. Drained mailboxes are
omitted rather than reported as zero, because the question is "who is owed a
reply" and a list of zeroes answers a different one at every reader's expense.

The read path now closes with one aggregate line built from it. The case that
motivated this is the session whose own inbox is empty: it saw silence and
concluded "all clear" while mail sat unanswered everywhere else.

BREAKING (injection contract): the read path is no longer silent whenever THIS
repo has nothing pending. It is a silent no-op only when the whole mailbox is
empty. Coupling the line to having your own mail would have hidden it from its
only real audience. Three selftest assertions that used "no output at all" as a
proxy for "nothing was delivered" now assert the absence of the content itself,
which is what they always meant.

The line is an AGGREGATE of two integers, never a roster. A list of names would
reproduce other repos' situation inside this repo's injection -- the state
boundary the mailbox exists to respect -- and mailbox names are cross-repo
input. Two integers cannot carry anything that escapes the framing.

Its disclaimer is engine behavior, not politeness (Rule 7): the line lands
directly beneath "handle this inbox FIRST", and without it the numbers read as
an extension of that obligation and a session starts answering other repos'
mail. Pinned in selftest section 26 exactly as section 20 pins the priority
text. The hook's header drops "(unread messages)" for the same reason -- it
would now announce mail that does not exist.

Selftest 116 -> 136. Every new negative check is anchored to a positive
assertion in the same output, because a missing script makes "X is absent"
true by vacuity and would have gone green proving nothing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01U6EixQo6hpoRCVtiAXdnFs
2026-07-27 20:31:21 +02:00

178 lines
8.5 KiB
Markdown

---
name: coord-send
description: >-
Send an inter-repo coordination message through the local coord mailbox — a
natural-language front door over the `coord-send` script. Use this whenever the
user wants to notify, tell, message, ping, or coordinate with another repository
(or all repositories) about work happening in the current repo: "send info to all
repos", "tell repo-x the bug is fixed", "let repo Y and Z know",
"broadcast that the spec changed", "reply to that coord message", or a
deferred/conditional notice like "when the build is green, notify repo X". Also
triggers on Norwegian phrasings: "send info til alle repo", "varsle repo X", "gi
beskjed til Y og Z", "kringkast at …", "svar på coord-meldingen", "når Z er ferdig,
varsle X". Trigger even when the user names a repo plus something to convey without
saying "coord" explicitly — routing a message to another repo IS this skill. Also
covers retiring a broadcast that has become wrong or obsolete: "retract that
broadcast", "that announcement is outdated, pull it", "trekk tilbake kringkastingen",
"den broadcasten er utdatert".
version: "0.8.0"
---
# coord-send — natural-language front door for inter-repo messages
This skill turns a plain request ("tell repo X that Y happened") into the right
`coord-send` invocation. The script is the engine; this skill is only the mapping
from intent to arguments. It never edits mailbox files by hand — always go through
the script, because the script owns the filename grammar, frontmatter, and delivery
guarantees.
## Boundary — why messages are thin
The mailbox is **transport, not state**. A coord message is a *notice*, not the
source of truth. The durable record of any decision lives in the owning repo's
state files / docs and its git history. So when you compose a body, write a
self-contained heads-up and point at where the real record lives (a commit
hash, a doc path) — don't try to make the message itself the canonical artifact.
Coordination content is also private: it never belongs on a public surface.
## The engine
Resolve the script path portably — this one expression is correct both when the
skill runs bundled inside the plugin and when the scripts are installed as
personal scripts under `~/.claude/scripts/`:
CSEND="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude}/scripts/coord-send.sh"
Interface (body comes from a quoted heredoc so nothing in it is shell-expanded):
# to one repo
"$CSEND" --to <repo> --subject "<subject>" <<'BODY'
<message body>
BODY
# to every repo (accumulates; first-time newcomers see it too)
"$CSEND" --broadcast --subject "<subject>" <<'BODY'
<message body>
BODY
# reply to a message this repo received (routes to the original sender and
# marks the original handled; target + "Re: …" subject are inferred)
"$CSEND" --reply-to <message-filename> <<'BODY'
<message body>
BODY
# retire one of THIS repo's own broadcasts (no subject, no body)
"$CSEND" --retract <broadcast-filename>
Sender identity (`--from`) defaults to the basename of the current git toplevel, so
you almost never set it. Outside a git repo there is no default — the send refuses
with exit 2 rather than naming itself after the working directory, so on a global
surface (`~/repos`, `$HOME`) pass `--from <repo>` and make the identity a choice.
Exit 0 = delivered; exit 2 = usage/IO error (read stderr and fix the arguments
rather than retrying blindly).
## Choosing the target
- **One named repo** → `--to <repo>`. The repo name is its directory basename; use
the name the user gave. No registration exists — sending to a new name just creates
that repo's inbox, so a typo silently creates a dead mailbox. If unsure a name is
real, check `~/repos/` or existing `~/.claude/coord/<repo>/` before sending.
- **Several named repos** ("X and Y") → loop `--to` once per repo with the same
subject and body. There is no multi-target flag; the loop is the mechanism:
for repo in repo-x repo-y; do
"$CSEND" --to "$repo" --subject "<subject>" <<'BODY'
<body>
BODY
done
- **All repos** → `--broadcast`. Prefer this only when the notice genuinely concerns
everyone, because broadcasts accumulate and every future first-time repo sees the
standing backlog. For a bounded, known set, loop `--to` instead so unrelated future
repos don't inherit it. A broadcast that later turns out wrong can be retired with
`--retract` (see below), but only for repos that have not received it yet.
- **A reply to something received** → `--reply-to <filename>`. Use the filename from
the injected inbox/archive; it resolves the sender and closes the original in one
step.
## Retracting a broadcast
When a broadcast has become wrong or obsolete, retire it — don't send a correction
and leave the original standing, because every future first-time repo would receive
both. `--retract <broadcast-filename>` archives it out of the delivery queue.
Three things to be honest about when you report it:
- **It is un-send, not recall.** Repos that already received the broadcast keep it.
Retraction only stops delivery to repos that haven't seen it yet. If the old news
actively misleads someone who already got it, a correcting broadcast is still
needed — retraction alone does not reach them.
- **Only the sender may retract.** The `from:` field must match this repo's identity.
If the announcing repo has since been renamed, its old identity no longer resolves,
so pass `--from <old-sender>` explicitly (read the sender off the file). Say that
you did.
- **Nothing is deleted.** The message moves to `_broadcast/archive/`. Never remove a
mailbox file by hand — the script owns the filename grammar and delivery guarantees.
Find the filename in `~/.claude/coord/_broadcast/inbox/` (or from the injected
`--- broadcast: <filename> ---` line) rather than guessing it.
## Composing the message
Derive a short, specific `--subject` from the intent if the user didn't give one
("ingest bug fixed", not "update"). In the body, state what happened, what the
recipient should know or do, and a pointer to the durable record (commit hash, doc
path). Keep it to the point — this is a notice, not a report. Match the repo's
language convention for message content; keep it sober and factual.
## Deferred and conditional sends
"When Z is done, notify X" means: do **not** send now. Hold the intent — the target,
subject, and body — and continue the work. The moment condition Z is satisfied *in
this session*, fire the send. This works because you carry the intent across turns
within a session.
Be honest about the limit: a skill cannot persist intent across sessions. If the
session is ending and the condition still hasn't been met, surface the pending
message to the user so it isn't silently lost — don't imply it will fire later on
its own.
## After sending
Report what actually happened: the target(s), the subject, and the delivered
filename(s) from the script's stdout. If a send failed (exit 2), say so with the
stderr reason rather than claiming success. Delivery reaches the recipient at *their*
next session start (the receive side is a hook), so tell the user it's queued, not
that the other repo has seen it.
## Examples
**Example 1 — single repo, composed body**
Input: "tell repo-x the ingest bug is fixed, it was commit abc1234"
Action: `--to repo-x --subject "ingest bug fixed"`, body naming the fix and
pointing at commit abc1234 and the owning doc.
**Example 2 — broadcast**
Input: "let all the repos know the shared spec grew a new validation rule"
Action: `--broadcast --subject "spec: new validation rule"`, body summarizing
the change and pointing at the spec's owning repo.
**Example 3 — bounded multi-target**
Input: "gi beskjed til repo-x og repo-y om at gaten er re-pinnet"
Action: loop `--to repo-x` then `--to repo-y`, same subject "shared gate re-pinned".
**Example 4 — deferred**
Input: "når testene er grønne, varsle repo-y"
Action: keep working; once the test run passes this session, send
`--to repo-y` with the green result. If the session ends first, surface the
pending notice to the user.
**Example 5 — reply**
Input: "svar på coord-meldingen fra repo-x at vi tar det"
Action: `--reply-to <that-message-filename>`, body acknowledging and stating the plan.
**Example 6 — retract**
Input: "den gamle kringkastingen om plugin-navnet er utdatert, trekk den"
Action: locate the file in `_broadcast/inbox/`, then `--retract <that-filename>`
(adding `--from <old-sender>` if this repo has been renamed since). Report that
repos which already received it are unaffected.