The review of v6.2.0..f669b87 (BLOCK: 1 BLOCKER, 12 MAJOR, 1 MINOR), each
fixed behind a test that failed first, or, for the two missing tests, a test
shown to fail on a stub of the branch it covers.
- Review steps appended by /trekexecute Phase 7.2 are held to the step rules
on any plan version: plan-validator --steps-from <N> (on a plan below 1.8 a
template review step validated and was executed).
- The guard refuses where no one can be asked also when its rules will not
load; the wave merge path names that refusal instead of MERGE_REFUSED.
Tests for the classifier-error refusal and post-approval-log's own check.
- release-check: the version files may change only in their version after
the review (JSON compared without it), README diff lines are read inside
hunks only, an unreadable diff is exit 2, and npm test runs without
NODE_TEST_CONTEXT.
- What counts as a step of only tests: a note in parentheses is not a path,
and a data file under specs/ is not a test. End-to-end: rides on the last
step that builds behaviour (validator hint, trekplan, template).
- A removed line is cited as <rev>:<path>:<line> (findings-schema hint,
trekreview re-ask).
- skill-lint counts a trailing newline as no line; regression-check takes
commandEnv from lib/util/command-env.mjs; CLAUDE.md names four mode-read
exemptions.
- /security-review, older than v6.2.0: the criteria runner refuses git
--output, which writes a file.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The minor points (B8-B12, C13, C14, C16, C17) of the second voyage-lekerepo
trial (2026-10-08), each verified against the code and started with a test
that failed first.
- K10: optional step field `Regression:` - one command the criteria runner
allows, unpiped; plan-validator refuses one that can never run
(PLAN_STEP_REGRESSION_NOT_RUNNABLE). Any plan_version, no bump.
- K11: `On failure:` opens with revert | retry | skip | escalate, or the
validator warns (PLAN_STEP_ON_FAILURE_UNKNOWN); onFailureAction in
plan-schema.
- B8 (operator decision 2026-10-08): minors open after the last critic round
are listed numbered in the Phase 10 summary; the ones the operator picks are
fixed and get one more round (--extra-round when the 3 are spent).
- B11: plan-review dedup merges two reviewers' findings on the same file:line
with the same content (trial pair: Jaccard 0.44, overlap 0.83); the Jaccard
threshold for every other pair is unchanged.
- B12: /trekbrief Step 4c says the reviewer runs in the background and is
waited for, not "foreground, blocking".
- C13: the Phase 4 size count includes .mjs, .cjs, .mts, .cts.
- C14: --evidence shows the first output line on PASS rows.
- C16: findings-schema checks path:line citations in finding prose (error) and
in the prose around the block (warning) against the file.
- C17: git-historian gets the brief, never proposes changing a frozen file,
and names the remote from `git remote -v`.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Independent read-only review of c56f852..2d29966 (2026-10-08), each defect
reproduced by the reviewer; each new test fails on that code.
- test-lock green ran ANY allowlisted command: `green --cmd "git status"`
marked a red step green and the stop guard let it stop. The lock now
stores the step's test command (`lock --cmd`); `green` runs only that
one (a different --cmd, or a lock without one, exits 2). trekexecute D1
calls `green` with no command, which also removes the quoting hazard.
- plan-gate --accept-open worked at round 1 and passed the gate; it now
refuses while rounds are left.
- findings-schema --repo-root swallowed a following flag, or took a root
that does not exist, and silently skipped the line check: exit 2.
- brief-review-stamp hashed only the body, so a changed `framing` or
`research_topics` stayed "current"; it now covers the reviewed
frontmatter too (only the post-review stamps are left out).
- red-proof red_kind read an assertion message naming SyntaxError as a
load error; the signatures are now specific.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
voyage-lekerepo end-to-end trial (2026-10-06), report points 1, 5, 11:
- engine-findings: recommended_action is "Fix <file:line> so this no longer
happens: <failure scenario>", not "Resolve: <title>" (8 of 8 engine
findings were set aside as actionability:empty); the coordinator never
sets an engine finding aside for Actionability.
- findings-schema --repo-root: a cited line past the end of an existing
file is FINDING_LINE_OUT_OF_RANGE, so Phase 5's bounded re-ask fixes it
before the coordinator sees it. The reviewers' instruction said "the
actual line number from the diff"; it now says the file's own line,
never the patch's.
- fill-finding-ids.mjs: the coordinator (no shell) writes @@ID_<n>@@ and
trekreview Phase 7 computes them over (file, line, rule_key); an
unresolved placeholder or a wrong 40-hex id fails. The 4-field id with
`title` the docs named is gone; the code always used three.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ordre 5 (wave 1, P11 + P5), review_version 1.1.
- K7: `verdict: ALLOW | WARN | BLOCK` is required in review.md (strict
error, soft warning for 1.0 reviews). New CLI lib/review/verdict-gate.mjs:
0 = ALLOW/WARN, 1 = BLOCK, 2 = could not decide (never green); a verdict
greener than the file's own BLOCKERs or JSON block is exit 2. Realpath
main guard (the old file:// guard exits 0 under a symlink - measured).
- No finding is struck for length: succinctness trims only MINOR/SUGGESTION
text (catalogue tier), keeps BLOCKER/MAJOR whole, counts trims; the
coordinator lists what it declined to judge.
- Claude Code's /code-review and /security-review run as the engine via the
Skill tool (never --fix/--comment/--post/ultra); lib/review/engine-findings.mjs
turns their findings into a reviewer payload; two catalogue keys
(CODE_REVIEW_DEFECT, SECURITY_REVIEW_VULNERABILITY), catalogue 12 -> 14.
An engine that did not run forbids ALLOW.
- Every BLOCKER is written as a numbered `### Step R<n>` with its source
finding (strict error REVIEW_MISSING_REMEDIATION_STEP).
- P5: lib/review/recurrence.mjs - a finding class in two review.md files
(current + git history, no new store) becomes one proposal, routed by the
catalogue's memory_route; written only between Voyage markers in
.claude/rules/voyage-review-lessons.md under a size budget, CLAUDE.md gets
a pointer only; the operator approves every line (Phase 8.7).
- Workflow substrate: catalogue enum in step; a missing reviewer or engine
forbids ALLOW there too (it returned ALLOW on zero findings before).
- Fixtures review-run-A/B said WARN over a BLOCKER; now BLOCK.
Borrowed and credited in code: Superpowers (declined-to-judge), ai-native-sdlc
(cap only nits; mistake/fix/check), Spec Kit (managed block; converge steps),
Pocock (retro routing), Kiro (verdict file + gate; evidence per lesson),
Cherny (engine -> brief control order; review -> memory; budget).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Codify the /trekreview Phase 5 reviewer JSON contract as a validated schema so
main validates each reviewer's output instead of merely JSON.parse-ing it, and
re-asks on schema failure (not just parse failure). Retires the fragility at
trekreview.md:202-204. No Workflow dependency (S8 tier 1, ships regardless).
New lib/review/findings-schema.mjs (3-layer Content -> Raw-text -> CLI shim,
reusing result.mjs error-shape + rule-catalogue RULE_KEYS/SEVERITY_VALUES):
- validateFindings(payload): hard errors on load-bearing fields the dedup
triplet + verdict depend on — file, rule_key (in catalogue), severity (enum),
line (integer >= 0); accumulates all errors; per-finding location.
- extractFindingsBlock(text): last fenced ```json block (the :202 contract).
- validateReviewerOutput(text): extract + parse + schema, unifying parse and
schema failures under one bounded re-ask path.
Stable codes: FINDINGS_NOT_OBJECT/_NOT_ARRAY/_NO_JSON_BLOCK/_PARSE_ERROR (top),
FINDING_MISSING_FILE/_MISSING_RULE_KEY/_UNKNOWN_RULE_KEY/_BAD_SEVERITY/_BAD_LINE
(per-finding). Descriptive fields + unknown keys tolerated (forward-compat).
Phase 5 prose: replace "parse last json block; on parse error re-emit" with
"validate against findings-schema; on failure re-ask conforming JSON, bounded
N=2; never feed unvalidated findings to the coordinator".
TDD: 27 failing tests first, then minimal code to pass. Suite 606 -> 647
(645 pass / 2 skip / 0 fail). claude plugin validate clean (only the known
root-CLAUDE.md warning). Plan: docs/W1-narrow-wins-plan.md S9.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LqBYc8Ltrk7LipyJmGxXiB
