Kjell Tore Guttormsen
f6e18a1d09
/trekbrief Phase 3 carried the interview form inline. It now asks for the new skill voyage:interviewing by name (allowed-tools gains Skill) and keeps only its own contract: the size class and budget, the three fixed questions (framing first, class, storage), where each answer lands in the brief, and the answers that decide nothing. Step 3a and the form points of Step 3c move into the skill with their credits (Pocock, Osmani, Spec Kit; licences and line ranges checked at the pinned commits). Red baseline first (3 helper interviews against a fixed answer sheet, Opus 5.5): 10-11 questions in round 1 (3 of 3), 15 of 31 without a recommendation, a hollow answer written in as a decision (2 of 3), unasked scope as a requirement (2 of 3). With the skill: 4, 0 of 12, 0 of 3, 0 of 3. Fact questions and stopping did not fail without it. Also: pointers to voyage:writing-criteria (S3) where criteria are asked and written, both review skill names (S3 + S4) in the brief-reviewer prompt; the intent pins that read moved text now read the skill, same assertions; the Phase 7 line_ref moves with the shorter Phase 3; 7 eval cases (3/2/2). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
350 B
350 B
| type | focus |
|---|---|
| llm | last_message |
PASS only if every requirement in the reply traces to one of the six questions and answers. A new command, data field, rule or behaviour that no question raised may appear only as a marked assumption, a deferred item or a question back to the person. FAIL if the reply adds such a thing as a plain requirement.