Ordre 5 (wave 1, P11 + P5), review_version 1.1. - K7: `verdict: ALLOW | WARN | BLOCK` is required in review.md (strict error, soft warning for 1.0 reviews). New CLI lib/review/verdict-gate.mjs: 0 = ALLOW/WARN, 1 = BLOCK, 2 = could not decide (never green); a verdict greener than the file's own BLOCKERs or JSON block is exit 2. Realpath main guard (the old file:// guard exits 0 under a symlink - measured). - No finding is struck for length: succinctness trims only MINOR/SUGGESTION text (catalogue tier), keeps BLOCKER/MAJOR whole, counts trims; the coordinator lists what it declined to judge. - Claude Code's /code-review and /security-review run as the engine via the Skill tool (never --fix/--comment/--post/ultra); lib/review/engine-findings.mjs turns their findings into a reviewer payload; two catalogue keys (CODE_REVIEW_DEFECT, SECURITY_REVIEW_VULNERABILITY), catalogue 12 -> 14. An engine that did not run forbids ALLOW. - Every BLOCKER is written as a numbered `### Step R<n>` with its source finding (strict error REVIEW_MISSING_REMEDIATION_STEP). - P5: lib/review/recurrence.mjs - a finding class in two review.md files (current + git history, no new store) becomes one proposal, routed by the catalogue's memory_route; written only between Voyage markers in .claude/rules/voyage-review-lessons.md under a size budget, CLAUDE.md gets a pointer only; the operator approves every line (Phase 8.7). - Workflow substrate: catalogue enum in step; a missing reviewer or engine forbids ALLOW there too (it returned ALLOW on zero findings before). - Fixtures review-run-A/B said WARN over a BLOCKER; now BLOCK. Borrowed and credited in code: Superpowers (declined-to-judge), ai-native-sdlc (cap only nits; mistake/fix/check), Spec Kit (managed block; converge steps), Pocock (retro routing), Kiro (verdict file + gate; evidence per lesson), Cherny (engine -> brief control order; review -> memory; budget). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
4.4 KiB
4.4 KiB
| type | review_version | created | task | slug | project_dir | brief_path | scope_sha_start | scope_sha_end | reviewed_files_count | verdict | findings | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| trekreview | 1.0 | 2026-05-01 | Add JWT authentication with refresh-token rotation | jwt-auth | .claude/projects/2026-05-01-jwt-auth/ | .claude/projects/2026-05-01-jwt-auth/brief.md | 0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef01234567 | fedcba9876543210fedcba9876543210fedcba98 | 3 | BLOCK |
|
Review: Add JWT authentication with refresh-token rotation (Run A)
Executive Summary
Implementation hits the brief's core success criteria (login + refresh + logout) but has one BLOCKER and four MAJOR/MINOR issues. Verdict: BLOCK — fix the BLOCKER before merge; the MAJORs should land in a follow-up plan.
This is a SYNTHETIC v1.0 fixture for testing the Jaccard determinism pipeline. It is NOT the output of a real LLM review.
Coverage
| File | Treatment | Reason |
|---|---|---|
lib/auth/jwt.mjs |
deep-review | Security-critical (token signing/verification) |
lib/handlers/login.mjs |
deep-review | Auth surface |
lib/handlers/logout.mjs |
deep-review | Auth surface |
package-lock.json |
skip | Lockfile |
dist/** |
skip | Build output |
Findings (BLOCKER)
763d174e6c519fafbadcba5d1706708479e36e61
- Location:
lib/handlers/login.mjs:23 - Rule:
UNIMPLEMENTED_CRITERION - Brief ref: SC-2 ("login endpoint MUST return 401 on invalid credentials")
- Evidence: Handler returns 200 with empty body when password mismatch occurs.
- Fix: Return 401 with WWW-Authenticate header per brief SC-2.
Findings (MAJOR)
d2d0e27875ae9ef0d818cb08bb6f14e6d33c4232
- Location:
lib/auth/jwt.mjs:42 - Rule:
SECURITY_INJECTION - Brief ref: Non-Goal #3 ("must not accept user-supplied algorithm header")
- Evidence:
jwt.verify(token, secret, { algorithms: req.body.alg })— algorithm taken from request body. - Fix: Hard-code
algorithms: ['RS256']; reject any token claiming a different alg.
7861519c326c207aabf17072db51c469bebc217b
- Location:
lib/auth/jwt.mjs:88 - Rule:
MISSING_TEST - Brief ref: SC-4 ("refresh-token rotation must be tested under concurrent refresh")
- Evidence: No test in
tests/covers the concurrent-refresh path; only happy-path is exercised. - Fix: Add
tests/auth/concurrent-refresh.test.mjscovering the race window.
7a3d7d0a668f6431ef3877ceeb106023b0f6295e
- Location:
lib/handlers/login.mjs:56 - Rule:
PLAN_EXECUTE_DRIFT - Brief ref: Plan Step 4 ("login.mjs uses bcrypt.compare()")
- Evidence: Plan said
bcrypt.compare; implementation usescrypto.timingSafeEqualover plaintext-derived buffers. - Fix: Either update plan + brief to record the deviation or refactor to bcrypt.compare per plan.
Findings (MINOR)
400dfcff81e0e219eb04a7123c68ae870696f121
- Location:
lib/auth/jwt.mjs:117 - Rule:
MISSING_ERROR_HANDLING - Brief ref: none (engineering hygiene)
- Evidence:
await refreshTokenStore.delete(jti)is not wrapped — store-down throws bubble to top-level handler. - Fix: Wrap in try/catch; log + 503 on store failure.
Remediation Summary
5 findings total: 1 BLOCKER, 3 MAJOR, 1 MINOR. Run a remediation plan via
/trekplan --brief review.md — it will pick up BLOCKER + MAJOR findings as
plan goals and emit source_findings: [<id>, ...] audit trail (Handover 6).
{
"fixture_kind": "synthetic-v1.0",
"jaccard_with_run_B": "5/6 = 0.833",
"findings": [
{"id": "763d174e6c519fafbadcba5d1706708479e36e61", "severity": "BLOCKER", "rule": "UNIMPLEMENTED_CRITERION", "file": "lib/handlers/login.mjs", "line": 23},
{"id": "d2d0e27875ae9ef0d818cb08bb6f14e6d33c4232", "severity": "MAJOR", "rule": "SECURITY_INJECTION", "file": "lib/auth/jwt.mjs", "line": 42},
{"id": "7861519c326c207aabf17072db51c469bebc217b", "severity": "MAJOR", "rule": "MISSING_TEST", "file": "lib/auth/jwt.mjs", "line": 88},
{"id": "7a3d7d0a668f6431ef3877ceeb106023b0f6295e", "severity": "MAJOR", "rule": "PLAN_EXECUTE_DRIFT", "file": "lib/handlers/login.mjs", "line": 56},
{"id": "400dfcff81e0e219eb04a7123c68ae870696f121", "severity": "MINOR", "rule": "MISSING_ERROR_HANDLING", "file": "lib/auth/jwt.mjs", "line": 117}
]
}