voyage/tests/fixtures/synthesis/exploration/architecture-mapper.md
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 6b30483304 feat(voyage): S12 — NW3 synthesis-agent built + measured → declined per measurement [skip-docs]
NW3 (CC-26 §6 PoC): delegate trekplan Phase 7 synthesis to a synthesis-agent,
adopt only if Δ main-context ≥30% with no quality loss. Operator chose the
deterministic-proof path (live ≥3-run bake-off was env-blocked: no API key;
installed plugin is a cache copy so a new agent is invisible to `claude -p`).

Decisive structural finding: trekplan Phase 5 runs the swarm FOREGROUND, so its
outputs are already resident in main before Phase 7. Delegating only Phase 7
evicts nothing → Δ_faithful = 0% (BASE-independent). The ≥30% saving needs an
out-of-scope Phase-5 redesign (swarm-writes-to-disk / nested orchestrator).
VERDICT: DECLINED per measurement.

- agents/synthesis-agent.md — dormant, schema-conformant deliverable (NOT wired)
- lib/plan/synthesis-digest-schema.mjs — digest output contract (+ tests)
- scripts/synthesis-measure.mjs — deterministic Δ-accounting core (+ tests)
- tests/fixtures/synthesis/ — 7 exploration outputs + representative digest
- docs/T1-synthesis-poc-results.md — measurement + verdict (reproducible)
- CLAUDE.md — agent table row (doc-consistency: 24 agents)

Tests 670 → 695 (693 pass / 2 skip / 0 fail). `claude plugin validate` clean
(only the pre-existing root-CLAUDE.md warning). commands/trekplan.md untouched.

[skip-docs] rationale: no user-facing feature ships (NW3 declined; agent dormant
and unwired). The substantive doc is docs/T1-synthesis-poc-results.md; the
README/CHANGELOG roll-up for NW1–NW3 is the S13 coordinated release per
docs/W1-narrow-wins-plan.md §S13.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LqBYc8Ltrk7LipyJmGxXiB
2026-06-18 17:58:39 +02:00

96 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown

# Architecture Report — output of architecture-mapper
Task being planned: Add a per-wave concurrency cap to trekexecute headless launches.
## Summary
Voyage is a contract-driven Claude Code plugin (Node ESM, zero runtime deps).
The pipeline is six commands (`commands/*.md`) backed by a `lib/` of pure,
unit-tested validators/parsers and a thin `scripts/` layer of measurement and
codegen harnesses. trekexecute is the disciplined plan/session-spec executor;
its headless path (Phase 2.6) fans out parallel "waves" of `claude -p`
subprocesses driven by a Bash launcher template.
## Tech stack
| Layer | Choice | Evidence |
|-------|--------|----------|
| Language | JavaScript (ESM, `.mjs`) | `lib/**/*.mjs`, `"type":"module"` in package.json |
| Tests | `node:test` + `node:assert/strict` | every `tests/**/*.test.mjs` |
| Validation | hand-rolled validators returning `{valid,errors,warnings}` | `lib/util/result.mjs` |
| Orchestration substrate | command prose + Bash + Agent/Task tool | `commands/trekexecute.md` |
| Headless launch | Bash here-doc template, backgrounded subprocesses | `templates/headless-launch-template.md` |
## Key patterns
- **3-layer module pattern** — Content validator → raw-text wrapper → CLI shim
(`if (import.meta.url === \`file://${process.argv[1]}\`)`), repeated across
`lib/validators`, `lib/parsers`, `lib/review`. Any new lib must follow it.
- **Structured Result type** — `issue(code,message,hint,location)` + `fail()` /
`ok()` from `lib/util/result.mjs`. Stable error codes are the contract.
- **Prose-as-orchestrator** — commands carry the control flow in markdown; the
harness executes it. Schema-drift defenses are *inlined* into command prose so
they survive even when agent docs are not implicitly loaded.
## Anti-patterns / debt near the task
- The headless launcher backgrounds **all** wave members at once with no upper
bound on concurrent `claude -p` processes; concurrency is implicit in how many
steps a wave contains. No central place caps it.
- Wave composition (which steps go in which wave) is computed by
session-decomposer, but the *launch* fan-out is template Bash, so a cap would
straddle a JS (decomposer) / Bash (launcher) boundary.
## Module map (task-relevant)
```
commands/trekexecute.md # Phase 2.6 parallel-wave orchestration prose
templates/headless-launch-template.md # the Bash fan-out site
lib/util/result.mjs # error shape any new guard returns
agents/session-decomposer.md # produces the wave/dependency graph
```
## Boundaries
The cap is a launch-time concern (Bash template + the Phase 2.6 prose that
generates it). It does not belong in the pure `lib/` validators unless we add a
small "max parallelism" resolver that the prose reads. Recommend a lib resolver
(testable) + a template wire-in (the actual `xargs -P` / job-slot mechanism).
## How Phase 2.6 assembles a wave (detail)
The executor reads the plan's `## Step N` blocks and the dependency edges
session-decomposer emitted (`depends_on:` frontmatter). Steps with no unmet
dependency at the current frontier form a wave. For each wave the prose:
1. builds a `SHARED_CONTEXT_FILE` (brief + plan + relevant exploration digest)
passed to every member via `--append-system-prompt-file` (cache-prefix
material — see q3 experiment);
2. emits one `claude -p … &` invocation per member from the here-doc, each with
`--max-turns`, `--max-budget-usd`, `GIT_OPTIONAL_LOCKS=0`, and the GH#36071
push-before-cleanup workaround;
3. collects the backgrounded PIDs and `wait`s for the batch to drain before
advancing the frontier.
The cap belongs strictly between (2) and (3): bound how many of the emitted
members run concurrently, leaving wave *composition* (1) untouched.
## Layering verdict
Three layers, in increasing blast radius: (a) a pure resolver in `lib/`
(arithmetic only — trivially testable, follows the 3-layer module pattern);
(b) Phase 2.6 prose passing the resolved integer + a `--max-parallel` flag into
the template; (c) the template's fan-out mechanism. Keep (a) the single source
of the number; (c) should only consume it. This matches every prior launcher
hardening, which added one bounded externality (budget, locks, turns) at a time
without reshaping wave composition.
## Cross-cutting observations
- The launcher is the most operationally sensitive file in the repo (it spends
money and mutates git). Every edit here is co-reviewed with its
doc-consistency needle list — treat the needle test as part of the contract,
not an afterthought.
- Nothing in `lib/` currently imports anything launcher-related; the resolver
will be a leaf module. Good — it can be tested and shipped independently of the
template wire-in, enabling a TDD-first slice.