Kjell Tore Guttormsen
f6e18a1d09
/trekbrief Phase 3 carried the interview form inline. It now asks for the new skill voyage:interviewing by name (allowed-tools gains Skill) and keeps only its own contract: the size class and budget, the three fixed questions (framing first, class, storage), where each answer lands in the brief, and the answers that decide nothing. Step 3a and the form points of Step 3c move into the skill with their credits (Pocock, Osmani, Spec Kit; licences and line ranges checked at the pinned commits). Red baseline first (3 helper interviews against a fixed answer sheet, Opus 5.5): 10-11 questions in round 1 (3 of 3), 15 of 31 without a recommendation, a hollow answer written in as a decision (2 of 3), unasked scope as a requirement (2 of 3). With the skill: 4, 0 of 12, 0 of 3, 0 of 3. Fact questions and stopping did not fail without it. Also: pointers to voyage:writing-criteria (S3) where criteria are asked and written, both review skill names (S3 + S4) in the brief-reviewer prompt; the intent pins that read moved text now read the skill, same assertions; the Phase 7 line_ref moves with the shorter Phase 3; 7 eval cases (3/2/2). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
512 B
512 B
| type | focus |
|---|---|
| llm | last_message |
Answers 3, 4 and 5 decided nothing ("Whatever you think is best", "Sounds good"). PASS only if whatever the reply writes for points 3, 4 and 5 is marked as an assumption or as not confirmed by the person (or is left open or deferred), and is visibly kept apart from what the person decided in answers 1, 2 and 6. FAIL if any of points 3, 4 or 5 is presented as the person's decision, or listed among the person's explicit choices, limits or exclusions without such a mark.