1
0
Fork 0
claude-code-complete-agent/examples/09-security-hooks/prompt.md
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 06ae605051 fix: pedagogical review - add expected output, CLAUDE.md, fix consistency
Address findings from pedagogical review simulating a non-expert user:

- Add CLAUDE.md to project root (was referenced but missing)
- Fix README score from 12/9/1 to 13/8/1 (match feature-map.md)
- Add Expected Output sections to examples 01, 02, 05, 09, 10
- Create pipeline-output/ and briefings/ directories
- Add example ordering guidance in README
- Add plan requirements for examples 11/13 in prerequisites
- Add skill frontmatter explanation in GETTING-STARTED.md
- Explain Cowork/Dispatch with links in cowork-integration
- Expand .gitignore with node_modules and generated output files
- Add model override hints in agent frontmatter comments

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-26 20:25:45 +01:00

92 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown

# Example 09: Security Hooks
**Capability:** Claude Code executes hook scripts before and after every tool call.
PreToolUse hooks can block dangerous operations. PostToolUse hooks create audit trails.
**OpenClaw equivalent:** Docker sandbox, exec approvals, tool deny lists, allowlists.
---
## How the Hooks Work
The `hooks/` directory in this repo contains two scripts:
- `pre-tool-use.sh` - runs before every Bash tool call. Blocks destructive patterns.
- `post-tool-use.sh` - runs after every tool call. Appends to `hooks/audit.log`.
Both are registered in `.claude/settings.json` under the `hooks` key.
---
## The Prompt
```
Try running this shell command: rm -rf /tmp/test-deletion-target
Before running it, explain what you expect the PreToolUse hook to do.
After the attempt, check hooks/audit.log and show me the last 5 entries.
Then explain what was blocked and why it was flagged by the hook.
```
---
## What Happens
1. Claude Code calls the Bash tool with `rm -rf /tmp/test-deletion-target`
2. Before execution, `pre-tool-use.sh` receives the command as input
3. The hook matches the `rm -rf` pattern and exits with a non-zero code
4. Claude Code receives the block signal and does not execute the command
5. `post-tool-use.sh` logs the blocked attempt with timestamp and tool name
6. Claude Code reports what happened and shows the audit log
---
## Reading the Audit Log
```bash
tail -20 hooks/audit.log
```
Each entry has the format: `[timestamp] TOOL: bash | STATUS: blocked | CMD: rm -rf ...`
---
## Expected Output
Claude will first explain what it expects the hook to do, then attempt the
command. You should see something like:
```
I expect the PreToolUse hook (hooks/pre-tool-use.sh) to intercept this
command because it matches the "rm -rf" pattern in the blocked list...
[Claude attempts: rm -rf /tmp/test-deletion-target]
[Hook blocks the command]
The command was blocked by the PreToolUse hook. The hook matched "rm -rf"
in the command string and returned exit code 2 with a block decision.
```
The audit log (`hooks/audit.log`) will contain an entry like:
```
[2026-03-26T10:15:23] TOOL: bash | STATUS: blocked | CMD: rm -rf /tmp/test-deletion-target
```
**How you know it worked:**
- The `rm -rf` command was NOT executed (nothing was deleted)
- Claude reported the hook blocked it
- `hooks/audit.log` exists and has at least one entry
- The entry shows STATUS: blocked
---
## Architecture Difference from OpenClaw
OpenClaw sandboxes via Docker: the agent runs inside a container that limits
what it can affect on the host. Claude Code sandboxes via permission layers and
hooks: PreToolUse intercepts at the call level, before any syscall happens.
For personal use, hooks are more flexible. You write exactly the rules you need.
For untrusted third-party agents, Docker isolation is stronger. See
`security/nemoclaw-comparison.md` for a full breakdown.