The last de-niche slice: recast the 10 sites where the vendor/sector beat
(Microsoft|Azure|Copilot|public sector) sat as the PRIVILEGED/default example,
varying each to a concrete cross-domain example instead of sterilizing
(plugin-is-domain-general — domain comes from user config, never hardcoded).
Recast (10): url-processing-templates (news worked-example Copilot->Figma),
opportunity-generation (3 headline examples + About block -> varied/ops persona),
profile (3 "good example" headlines/impact -> healthcare/e-commerce/support),
first-comment-strategy (drop "Microsoft" from research-paper example),
poll-strategy-guide (Copilot option -> generic AI assistants),
engagement-frameworks (1 of 3 direct-address audiences -> RevOps/SaaS),
setup (audience e.g. -> two varied examples), post (invocation e.g. -> SaaS pricing),
network-builder (tagline example -> ops/manufacturing),
video-scripter (2 filename slugs -> neutral topics).
Kept as false positives (would sterilize): content-angles.md (Public Sector is
1 of 6 balanced industry tables + Industry-Agnostic section), outreach.md
(Microsoft Build/Ignite/Azure UG = 3 of ~20 varied real conferences),
linkedin-growth-playbook (biographical fact in a real case study), the
Gemini/Tavily/Perplexity MCP tool-name examples, and the algorithm-signals
"Gemini provenance" SSOT citation. AI-as-topic kept (not a niche token; the
de-AI/AI-slop mechanic is the plugin's legit subject).
Gate scripts/test-runner.sh 87/0/0 (no lint touches these files yet; §17-guard
extension to content-planner is the deferred next step). 10 files, 26/26.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RBMKqPSVbvSZHtQ4heM1UY
Third sub-pass of the S29 plugin-wide terminology scrub: the banned brand phrase
"thought leadership" (FORM A) removed from the reference-doc surface — the largest pass
(2x S29a/S29b). 34 edits across 15 reference files. Vocabulary consistent with S29a/S29b:
"thought leadership angle(s)" -> "content angle(s)"; "thought leadership" (positioning/practice)
-> "authority ..."; content-type labels -> "authority content / authority posts"; the whole
"Value Test" family -> "Authority Value Test".
Established cross-pass equivalents closed: glossary:229 "Thought Leadership Value Test" ->
"Authority Value Test" (closes the S29b cross-directory naming gap); glossary:29 "8 universal
thought leadership angles" -> "content angles"; engagement-frameworks:137 "Standard Thought
Leadership Structure" -> "Standard Post Structure" (matches S29a post:98).
S29e filename locked this session: thought-leadership-angles.md -> content-angles.md (operator-
chosen). The canonical file's in-file title/headers scrubbed now for consistency (H1 ->
"# Content Angles"; "## The Authority Value Test"; "### Step 3: Test For Authority Value");
the file rename + all 20 pointers remain S29e (atomic).
Judgment-calls (operator-approved): thought-leadership-angles:212 "disguised as thought
leadership" -> "expertise" (S29b vocab); linkedin-formats:295 -> "Text-based content" (avoids
authority...authority echo); linkedin-visual-style:3 -> "For building authority,"; ai-content-
framework:380 "main LinkedIn thought leadership skill" -> "content skill" (avoids awkward
"authority skill"). Kept by design: video-strategy-guide:429 ironic quote; video-strategy-
guide:532 "TL;DW" false positive (too long, didn't watch).
Scope (operator-locked, inherits S29a/S29b): FORM A only. FORM B ("thought leader(s)" as role,
references = 4) untouched. The 3 thought-leadership-angles.md filename pointers in references/
deferred to S29e.
Verify: FORM A in references/ = only the kept ironic quote (video:429); canonical file in-file
FORM A = NONE; FORM B unchanged (4); filename pointers unchanged (3); no anchor links to changed
headers; gate 81/0/0; counts 29/19/26/6 + v0.5.0 unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016qgzo6rxthw7KuxHjn5vyE
Add /ultraresearch-local for structured research combining local codebase
analysis with external knowledge via parallel agent swarms. Produces research
briefs with triangulation, confidence ratings, and source quality assessment.
New command: /ultraresearch-local with modes --quick, --local, --external, --fg.
New agents: research-orchestrator (opus), docs-researcher, community-researcher,
security-researcher, contrarian-researcher, gemini-bridge (all sonnet).
New template: research-brief-template.md.
Integration: --research flag in /ultraplan-local accepts pre-built research
briefs (up to 3), enriches the interview and exploration phases. Planning
orchestrator cross-references brief findings during synthesis.
Design principle: Context Engineering — right information to right agent at
right time. Research briefs are structured artifacts in the pipeline:
ultraresearch → brief → ultraplan --research → plan → ultraexecute.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
