C1. `okf consume` and MCP's `okf_ask` now rank with BM25 (`bm25.py`) instead
of the three-signal fusion. Two signals, fused by reciprocal rank:
- passage: every body cut into 500-character windows every 250, a concept
scored by its BEST window -- a narrow question is answered in one place;
- field: title three times, the id path and source name twice, then the body
-- a broad question is answered by what a section is called.
The document prior and the rarity weight are gone from the default: the first
favoured big documents full of common words, the second gave its largest
weight to a word the collection does not hold. Under BM25 such a word weighs
exactly zero. A signal that scores a concept zero adds nothing to it, and ties
share a rank, so alphabetical order lifts nothing either.
Three rules carried over from the fusion, each with its own test, because the
suite showed what BM25 alone lost:
- a directory every concept shares is not read (K3-20's defect, one signal on);
- a number a section is known by (`4.2`, `10.2-2`) is kept as one token, or
a question naming a section by its number matches nothing in it;
- a question word the collection does NOT hold is read as the collection's
words it shares a leading word with (`consume.tokens_match`) -- Norwegian
inflection and compounding -- at that word's idf, never at its own.
The lookup and title-covered partitions are shared with the fusion
(`_partitioned`). `ranking="fusion"` / `--ranking fusion` keeps the old order
reachable; `--cost-vocabulary` and `--rarity-weight` widen only the fusion and
are refused with the default (`ranking_flag_conflict`) rather than ignored.
C3. A concept longer than `PASSAGE_CHARS` (4 000) is delivered as the span
around its best window, snapped to whole lines, under the nearest heading
above it, with `[...]` where text was left out. `passage: {start, end, of}`
says so, `text_sha256` covers what was delivered, and `sha256` stays the
file's, so the whole can be fetched by `concept_id`. 4 000 because eight
excerpts of it stay far under a tool response's limit even with several
sub-questions merged, while a 500-character window keeps 3 500 characters of
surroundings. The budget pays for the passage, not the file.
Tests moved with the default, each stated rather than silenced:
- fusion-mechanism tests (cost vocabulary, rarity weight, reservation, shared
rank, the reference-bundle pins) ask for `ranking="fusion"`, the order they
were measured on; the BM25 reading of the reference bundle is a separate
measurement, kept in local state;
- the retrieval gate still measures the shipped default. Row 1 holds. Four of
its premises were built against the fusion (a concept forced below k that
BM25 now delivers, a quota that no longer decides, mutants patching fusion
code) and are `xfail(strict=True)` until the fixtures are re-measured;
- the shipped example payload is regenerated; the shipped skill is unchanged.
README's Consume section and CLAUDE.md state the new default and that the
flags described after it belong to the fusion.
The search gate's table for this commit is kept in local state: the question
sets belong to a consumer whose content does not go on a public mirror.
Suite on a clean tree after `git add`: 2390 passed, 2 skipped, 4 xfailed.
ruff, ruff format, mypy --strict clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Operator decision 2026-09-21: nothing from that consumer's collection goes out
on the public remote. The NAME stays where it is already published -- it is a
consumer of this library, named as such, and removing it would mean rewriting
published history, which this repository does not do. What goes is everything
that describes their CONTENT.
Removed across README, CLAUDE.md, CHANGELOG, four dated reports, the
consumption contract, three source modules and three test modules: their
corpus's document and page counts, the concept count of a bundle built from
it, the byte figures of a payload built from it, the question and fasit counts
and recorded score of their evaluation set, a bundle id with two content refs,
an order id naming them, and a path into their repository.
Kept, because the argument survives without the corpus: RATIOS and
percentages. A ratio is the finding -- a withheld list that is 65.5 % of a
payload is a defect at any corpus size -- and it discloses nothing about how
large anyone's collection is. Where a claim lost its denominator it now SAYS
so rather than quietly reading as unmeasured: the gate-refusal limitation in
the README states that the corpus and its counts are deliberately withheld and
points the reader at their own build, which is the number that binds them
anyway.
One integrity pin is kept and named here rather than left to be found: the
retrieval gate still pins that set by sha256, because the pin is what refuses
a self-written file in the right shape, and a checksum discloses nothing about
what it checksums. Its recorded SCORE is gone -- that was their figure about
their own corpus, and the row now says so instead of restating it.
The known-positive constants move with the contract document, as they must.
Suite green, 2372 passed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
**A subagent inherits its session's MCP tools; it does not inherit its skills.**
So the method A3 put in the skill reaches the main thread and no arm running
below it, and the one place every caller sees is the server's own
`instructions` and its tool descriptions. Both are truncated by Claude Code at
2 KB, and truncation is worse than rejection here -- a reader gets the first
half of a method and no sign the rest existed -- so what travels is the SHORT
form and the long one stays in the skill, which has no such cap. A test holds
it under the limit WITH a control, so the assertion is a measurement and not a
tautology.
`okf_describe` without `bundle_id` now describes every served bundle, where it
refused and `okf_ask` in the same position fanned out. The tool a caller is
told to read FIRST was the one requiring a name it did not have yet, and a
tool that refuses the call its sibling accepts is a shape a client must be
told out of band -- the configuration this server exists to remove. The named
call's shape is byte-unchanged, and so is every one-to-one server's: the
fan-out replaces an ERROR, so no caller's bytes move.
`okf project`'s closing lines and the README's first screen carry the one line
the USER runs to register the server on user scope, verified against Claude
Code's own MCP documentation (`claude mcp add [options] <name> -- <command>`).
Nothing here starts Claude Code, and the line says whose it is. Measured:
a project bundle at `<root>/<project>/.okf/<id>` is depth 3, inside
`MAX_DISCOVERY_DEPTH`, so a `--root` server finds what `okf project` wrote --
a test builds one and discovers it rather than reasoning about the walk.
A5, and it was free: `okf skill` without `--out` now refuses in the same
`refused (<code>)` form as every other refusal in this chain. The exit code
does not move -- 2 was already right, "the run did not happen" -- what was
wrong was that a caller parsing our form got argparse's line on the one flag
everybody forgets.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The operator built a 2313-concept bundle from one project's own documentation,
asked it a question in his own words, and judged the result unusable. The
generated skill was an audit contract: all its discipline sat on the accounting
-- markings, denominators, budget lines, source pointers -- and none of it on
understanding the question, searching again, or writing one coherent answer.
Two sentences actively forbade the second of those.
**The two forbidding sentences are gone and their replacements are tested from
both sides.** "Do not go looking for context the pre-pass deliberately
withheld" read as "one run per question", and no wording of the operator's
question put the right document inside a single run's cut -- so a rule against
a second run was a rule against finding it at all. "Not something to retry with
a narrower question" generalised a budget-refusal case into the same ban.
SS 2.2 of the contract said the first of them, so the contract moved with the
skill rather than being left to disagree with it: a second pre-pass run with
other terms, and a fetch of a concept the payload NAMED, are reachable; SS 9's
two real boundaries -- directory enumeration, the verdict layer -- are not.
**Two new sections, and the checker requires them.** `## Working method`: read
the bundle's map, put the question into the bundle's own words, split a broad
question into 2-4 sub-questions, search per sub-question, read what lay just
outside the cut and search again with its words, same method across several
bundles, then assemble ONE answer ordered by sub-question, saying which source
holds and what is not covered. `## Answer form`: the questioner's language,
plain prose, no `below_k`, no digests, no budget lines, no denominators; short
textbook-style references (document + section, plus bundle where several were
read); and the audit trail written only when the questioner asks for it or
into a document that travels without the skill. `REQUIRED_SECTIONS` follows the
template and the contract's new SS 2.5 and SS 2.6 -- never the other way round.
**The generic skill becomes what `okf skill` and `okf project` write.** A
per-bundle skill's numbers go stale the moment its bundle is rebuilt, one copy
per consuming project, and a project with two bundles installs two
near-identical skills; the generic form carries no bundle's numbers and names
`okf card` for them. `--for-bundle` is the opt-in for the instantiated copy,
which still refuses out loud on a stale pairing -- safe to keep, not enough to
keep default. `rule_bundle_identity` learned to tell a generic skill from an
unfilled template by the frontmatter name the generator writes, so the template
still fails for the opposite reason: it declares no identity because it is
unfinished.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Measured 2026-09-20 on a 2313-concept bundle of one project's own
documentation: `withheld` held 2 305 entries = 186 440 B of compact JSON =
**65.5 % of the 284 850-byte payload**, and not one of those bytes counted
against the budget the same payload reports (`spent` was 45 192). A reader was
handed 239 658 bytes the budget line did not know about, to learn 2 305 concept
ids with nothing beside them -- the title being exactly what `--withheld-titles`
existed to buy, and which was off because buying it for 2 305 entries cost
another 37.9 %.
`withheld` is now a mapping: `total` (equal to `denominators.withheld`, so
SS 5.2's identity is unmoved and closes on the NUMBERS), `by_rule` (the same
total decomposed over the closed rule set, so "what kind of drop" is answerable
without the list), `nearest` (the best-ranked drops BY NAME, with title and
source document, so a reader who sees a near miss can ask for it) and
`complete`. The near misses are read off the ranking, not off `cut`'s output:
`cut` sorts by id so the partition is comparable, and that order says nothing
about which concept a reader might want next.
Same question, same bundle, after: **52 421 bytes, 18.4 % of the old file**.
The whole list stays reachable behind `--withheld-full`, and the two
instruments that classify EVERY miss by its rule -- the retrieval gate and
`okf_consume_measure` -- now ask for it explicitly and assert `complete`
rather than assuming it. `--withheld-nearest N` sets the cap (default 20,
which is `k` plus the next twelve). `--withheld-titles` is retired: a flag
whose only remaining effect would be to STRIP the title from a list the caller
asked for in full names no decision worth two shapes for one list.
`CONTRACT_REVISION` moves to `okf-consumption/2`, because a consumer indexing
the old key as a list would otherwise break silently. Three checker rules move
with it, and one of them is the interesting case: `parent_unfollowable` used
`excerpts` + `withheld` as the bundle's own denominator, which a truncated
block is not -- so that clause now runs only where the payload SAYS it is
complete, stated in SS 8.6 rather than left as a silence, with the other two
clauses (shape, self-reference) running either way. `Report` carries both
denominators, because a report claiming it examined 2 305 entries it never saw
is the same defect one level up.
The generated skill's "breaking point" section goes with it: it extrapolated a
concept count from the cost of ONE withheld entry, and there is no such slope
any more. It now states what this bundle's bookkeeping cost and that the block
is bounded by the cap rather than by the bundle -- an extrapolation from a
slope the code no longer has would be a measurement of the previous revision.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`project.create` called `build()` with five keyword arguments and no `gate=`,
so `okf project` screened by the package default and nothing anywhere said
that was a choice rather than the only option. The gate is not a segmentation
rule -- it is a screen about whether a document may be persisted at all -- so
it is the one flag this command owns that may move a bundle's bytes, and the
module docstring, the README paragraph and the test file's own claim are
corrected rather than left standing beside the new flag.
The default is `okf build`'s default, so an unflagged `okf project` is the
bytes it always was; the byte-equality invariant against `okf build` holds
unchanged. An unknown gate name still raises `gate_invalid` rather than
falling back -- a fallback reproduces the defect with an extra step.
Tests first, all three red: the gate name read back out of the bundle's own
`log.md` (not out of the call), the flag parsed by this command's parser, and
the unknown name refused.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Measured 2026-09-20 on an official documentation corpus of 594 sources built
with the shipped default gate `guard-trusted-source`: 17 sources were refused
OUTRIGHT -- `fail_secure` 3, `quarantine_review` 14 -- and 16 of them were
among 197 official documentation pages, the pages on hooks, skills,
permissions, errors, env-vars and authentication among them. The summary said
only `fail_secure`: 3/594. Three of the four facts a reader needs were missing:
the COUNT of documents the gate dropped (the existing `rejected (coded)` line
sums gate refusals and extraction failures, two failures with two different
remedies), the NAMES, and the way out. Rebuilt with `--gate none`, all 17 went
through untouched, so the refusal is the gate and not the readers.
`okf build` now prints a `Documents the gate refused WHOLE` section directly
under the denominator, carrying all four: the count with its denominator, the
names capped at ten with the rest in the bundle's `log.md`, the codes, and
`--gate none` for a source you vouch for yourself. The same fact goes to stderr
in one line, built from the same field, because `okf build > report.txt` is an
ordinary thing to do. `log.md` gains one bullet naming every refused document,
uncapped.
The exit code deliberately does not move. The build is valid -- every refusal
is coded, the conservation identity holds, and the bundle is a true record of
what the gate allowed. What was wrong was the silence.
A run the gate refused nothing from is byte-identical in both places, which is
the known-negative in the new suite: no bundle this repository ships was built
with a gate refusal, so this cannot have moved a byte measured here.
Also, and measuring nothing new:
- README gains `Known limitations` high up -- the gate's refusals and the way
out, the absent ceiling on what one run pays for images (a 70 KB PDF with 16
images under the declared limit reached 851 MB peak RSS; RLIMIT_AS is not
enforceable on this platform, so the 512 MiB per-link budget is the whole
bound), the three gates of this repository that are RED today (retrieval
5/7/8/9, MCP 2, accounting 2/3/6 -- all three re-run on this commit), what
the content accounting does not count, and the rough edges nothing is
planned for.
- The two `pip install` lines under "Install in detail" install `[extract]`.
The first screen does; those two did not, so the two recipes produced
different installations and the detailed one reports `resolved converter
path: unresolved (extractor_extra_missing)`.
- Version `1.0.0`, synced across pyproject, `__version__`, `uv.lock`, the four
README install lines, the install prose, the current-tag entry and the
CHANGELOG, where the two "after the 0.10.1 notes were written, untagged"
sections are folded in. It adds no capability over `v0.10.1`; what it adds
is that the tool says what it does not do.
Suite: 2325 passed, 2 skipped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Four claims on the front page were false on this commit, and one of them was a
number no division ever produced.
**The retrieval gate.** README reported it RED on rows 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 and 9,
with row 3 at 2 of 5 and row 4 at 3 of 6. Run on this commit it is RED on rows
5, 7, 8 and 9, with row 3 at 5 of 5 and row 4 at 6 of 6: `f81683e` made a
withheld concept carry the rule that actually decided it, and `05cb190` gave
the payload a `coverage` block, and neither updated the table. Row 8 is `0 of 3
| NOT RUN` on the default run and was published as `44 of 64 questions`, which
is what it scores the day all three private sets are handed to it -- now
labelled with the day and the machine rather than printed as a row. The same
four figures were stale in `CLAUDE.md`.
**The breaking point in a generated skill.** `int(LIMIT / per_withheld) if
per_withheld else 0` printed `At roughly 0 concepts the bookkeeping alone
reaches the 120000-byte limit` whenever the generation run withheld nothing --
the absence of a measurement, rendered as one, and read as a bundle that breaks
before it holds anything. A run with no withheld entry has no slope to
extrapolate from, so the sentence is withheld with its reason. The shipped
`skills/okf-consume/SKILL.md` is generated with the question its
`references/README.md` names, withholds nothing, and carried exactly that `0`;
it is regenerated. Two arms in the test, because one would pass on an empty
set: the bundles that withhold something must still state a positive figure.
The sentence for that arm also stopped saying `**4 bytes** for 3 concepts`
where the 4 bytes were the cost of 0 withheld entries. It is now `for N of M
concepts`, which moves two generated skills' line counts and therefore the
published comparison: 280 of 312 and 310 -> 281 of 313 and 311, re-measured,
with the 62 differing lines unchanged.
**Four tools.** A single-bundle server exposes three: `okf_list` is absent
where there is nothing to list. README's table already said so in a cell; the
heading and the CHANGELOG did not.
**What `--accounting` accounts for.** The account is over the element classes
each format's vocabulary names, verified against `accounting._READERS` rather
than against the report: a file whose suffix has no reader is accounted at file
level only, `.docx` reads `document.xml` and `footnotes.xml` (so headers,
footers, endnotes and comments are outside), `.pptx` reads the slides (so
speaker notes are outside), `.xlsx` reads the worksheets (so cell comments are
outside and a cell contributes its cached value, never its formula), and `.rtf`
skips its header and footer groups. A hidden slide or sheet IS counted -- it
lives in the same part as a visible one. Nothing is built for this; the list is
what `0 unaccounted` does not claim.
Gates re-run on the commit: retrieval `GATE RED: rows 5, 7, 8, 9` (exit 1),
MCP `GATE RED: rows 2` (exit 1), both matching what is now written.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The eval was written RED at `5f1772e` with no server in the tree. This is the
capability it was written against.
`okf mcp --bundle <dir>` serves exactly one bundle, whose tools take no bundle
argument. `okf mcp --root <dir>` (repeatable) serves every bundle under the
roots and knows NONE of them by name. Four tools -- `okf_list`,
`okf_describe`, `okf_ask`, `okf_fetch` -- each carrying its reason in the
description a client actually reads.
Gate today: 1 (7/7) - 2 (83/181) - 3 (4/4) - 4 (9/9) - 5 (3/3) - 6 (6/6),
`GATE RED: rows 2`, exit 1.
THE PROTOCOL IS STDLIB, AND THAT IS THE PACKAGING INVARIANT KEPT RATHER THAN
A TASTE. An MCP SDK would be this package's second runtime dependency on the
DEFAULT install path, for four JSON-RPC methods and a newline framing, and
`test_the_only_runtime_dependency_is_the_security_boundary` pins that list
literally. Chosen hand-written because the surface needed is `initialize`,
`notifications/initialized`, `tools/list` and `tools/call`; `uv.lock` is
untouched.
NOTHING IS CACHED ACROSS CALLS, and row 3 is why. Every call re-walks the
roots and recomputes `bundle_ref`, so a bundle added, removed or rebuilt while
the process runs is seen by the next call with no restart, no configuration
edit and no code change -- 9 of 9 discovery checks over three bundles written
while the server was serving. The cost is paid per call and is published
rather than hidden: 0.75 s for the identity of a 2 756-concept bundle, 5.6 s
for one ask, 4 min 13 s for row 2's full run over four bundles.
CONTAINMENT IS TWO INDEPENDENT CHECKS: the bundle's own index must name the
concept, AND `connectors.safe_resolve` must place it inside the bundle. A
mutant removing either one alone still refuses -- with a DIFFERENT code, which
row 6 asserts by name -- and one removing both is killed. Row 6 declares a
code set per case because its first run had the 10 MB concept refused as
`concept_unknown`: the fixture had not named the file in the index, so the
size ceiling never ran and the row was green for a reason unrelated to the
attack.
`okf card <bundle>` and `okf skill --generic` are the one-to-many skill
candidate. The card is DERIVED on every run and never written into the bundle:
storing it would move the bytes of all six `examples/*/expected-bundle` trees
(23 files compared byte-for-byte) and of the pinned reference bundle, to keep
something recomputable in under a second, and a stored card is one more
artefact that can disagree with what is beside it. Measured here rather than
taken from the order: two per-bundle skills are identical on 280 of 312 and
310 lines; the 62 that differ are identity, concept count, the
conditional-field table, the whole-bundle cost and the breaking point. The
generic skill carries none of them, and `render_generic()` takes no argument,
so there is no bundle it could have read.
Row 2 decomposes into three numbers and the middle one is the finding: 99 of
181 (bundle, anchor) pairs are present in the bundles at all, 83 of those 99
were reached, and 0 of 83 were met by `okf_fetch` on the anchor as a concept
id. The set's anchors and this library's concept ids are different
vocabularies, so every pair met was met through the ranker -- 83 is a FLOOR on
the ceiling, never the ceiling.
13 mutants in a scratch copy, never in the working tree: 12 killed, 1 survived
with its mechanism printed, 0 errors, control green first. Suite 2323 passed,
2 skipped. The architecture choice between the two shapes is the OPERATOR's;
these rows are its input. Report: docs/2026-09-20-mcp-to-varianter.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
README's row table and the `--real` paragraph, CLAUDE.md's gate entry,
CHANGELOG under 0.10.1 (no new version, no tag), and the full report.
The report carries the eight attacks before and after, the row table before
and after, row 8's three-set measurement with its two granularities apart, the
mutation table as properties rather than as code lines, and § 6 -- the three
things this round does NOT close: row 3 can still be made green by an honest
change that costs elsewhere (the gate is the unit, not the row), the judge's
parser is still `consume`'s and is bounded by measurement rather than removed,
and `SPECS_SHA256` digests the corpus's fields rather than the bundle's bytes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
One command, one exit code, and no capability: nothing here changes the
ranking, the fusion, the tokenisation or the cut. For a frozen question set
against a bundle it asks how many of N measurement units the payload carries
the fasit for, gives every miss exactly ONE class, and asks the thing the
payload does not do at all -- say so when it does not know.
Today, on the synthetic corpus this repository generates and the five sets it
ships pinned by sha256: rows 1 (9 of 9), 2 (7 of 7) and 6 (9 of 9) green;
3 (2 of 5), 4 (3 of 6), 5 (0 of 1), 7 (11 of 13), 8 (not run) and 9 (0 of 6)
red. GATE RED, exit 1.
- Row 3 is the finding to read first. In a bundle built from ONE source
document, every concept past the first two carries that document's
`source_file`, so a concept the RANK had already lost is withheld as
`source_quota_exceeded`. The truth is decided by the SAME cut run without
the quota -- PM measured the same lie on 13 of 25 real misses 2026-09-17.
- Row 4 is the second. No payload key says "this bundle does not answer
that", so the only honest reading today is `delivered == 0`; three of six
controls come out right and the three that do not get eight excerpts and no
statement. A control the bundle DOES answer must come back unmarked, or the
marking says nothing, so both directions sit in the same row.
- A miss has exactly one class -- (a) not in the bundle, (b) below k, (c) cut
by quota or budget, (d) delivered without the citation, (e) other -- and
each is FORCED by its own fixture. An unplaced miss takes the row to 0 of N.
- The judge opens the bundle. Every concept is read off disk before a payload
is built, a delivered excerpt whose text is not the concept file's bytes is
not a hit, and the two title forms come from `quality` rather than being
written a second time.
- FELLED means a row got WORSE, never merely that something changed: removing
the quota makes row 3 green, and counting that as a kill would credit this
gate with a check it does not have. The two survivors are reported with what
they measured -- the document prior dead and RRF_K flattened each moved 0
ranks and 0 deliveries on these fixtures -- and with a mechanism for each.
- Rows 8 and 9 are never green by leaving something out. The three real sets
are read from path + sha256 and never committed: a gold set names a
consumer's documents and this repository is public. K2 is 0 of 6 because the
gold set exists nowhere while its bundles do.
Denominators re-measured against the sources 2026-09-19, and all four hold:
wiki 20 questions / 29 fasit entries (sha 972d0f57...), R761 8 (S1-S6 + KP +
KN), vegnormal 32 questions / 43 must_cite, K2 6. PM's 45 of 70 is itself a
mixed sum -- wiki at question level, vegnormal at citation level -- so this
gate carries it labelled as recorded and never sums the two granularities.
46 tests, each failing row driven both ways through inputs rather than by
editing the row. No network (the socket guard is fired before its silence
counts), no private corpus, no clock.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
README, CHANGELOG (under the untagged 0.10.1), CLAUDE.md and the round's
report. The numbers are the census's, not a summary of them.
- 9 714 image rows over 18 403 files and 67 PDFs, two pinned trees: exactly
35 rows moved, 9 321 of 9 321 JPEG and PNG rows byte-identical.
- The 16 the round did not go looking for: JPEG 2000 objects out of PDF
streams, also unreadable by a model, with no stdlib route to convert them.
They become `asset_not_viewable` -- 16 pictures lost from a bundle, 16
statements gained that a picture stood there. Stated in the README, the
CHANGELOG, CLAUDE.md and the report rather than left in a total.
- The accounting gate: R761 0 -> 19 claimed-and-not-found when the conversion
landed, 0 again after the judge learned its second route; row 6 90 of 111
-> 110 of 111. The gate's verdict is the same `RED: rows 2, 3, 6` as before
the round, with row 3's numbers identical.
- `<!-- asset-viewable-media-types: ... -->` is pinned to
`assets.VIEWABLE_MEDIA_TYPES` by a test, compared as a whole set: a README
naming three of four would pass every containment check and tell a consumer
that a format is refused when it is carried.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Chosen: a stdlib BMP reader, because `read_image` is on the CORE path and an
asset's name is its content digest. Measured first, as the order requires:
Pillow 12.3.0 IS in this tree (transitively under `pdfplumber`) and it DOES
decode RLE8 correctly -- a hand-written stdlib decoder and Pillow agree on
19 of 19 of R761's real files, RGB per pixel. So the choice does not rest on
capability. It rests on two properties of this package: `.html` and `.xml`
carry images with no `[extract]` extra installed, so a Pillow converter
either makes a core path depend on an optional binary wheel or buys the
second runtime dependency; and encoding through an installed library would
make a bundle's identity move with that library's version, which is the
property 0.10.0 felled page rasterisation over and `encode_png`'s docstring
already defends. Pillow keeps the job it is good for: the INDEPENDENT decoder
in the tests, on neither side of the conversion.
The defect, measured over the frozen R761 delivery's `assets/`, denominator
50: 29 JPEG, 2 PNG and 19 RLE8 BMP. The 19 are byte-correct files nothing
reads, so 19 figures were present and invisible while `images: N` reported
that they had arrived.
- `VIEWABLE_MEDIA_TYPES` is tested against every asset's SNIFFED type, so it
is a property and not a list of formats we met. WebP is on it and `sniff`
does not recognise one; the limit is stated, not implied.
- `bmp_to_png`: 8-bit uncompressed, 8-bit RLE8, 24-bit uncompressed. All five
RLE8 opcodes. 19 of 19 real files convert with RGB identical to Pillow's
decoding of the source, 2 366 365 pixels compared.
- `asset_not_viewable` and `asset_bmp_unsupported`, both published, both
leaving the concept's "not carried" line.
- Traceability on the pointer's second line, where the rest of the asset
metadata already lives: original media type, original sha256 in full, new
sha256 in full. A converted asset is ONE asset.
- The ceiling is paid on the DECLARATION before a row is allocated, and an
RLE run is one clipped slice -- painting pixel by pixel leaves the memory
bounded and the CPU unbounded.
Two repairs the change forced, each measured rather than assumed:
- `tests/test_assets.py`'s "dimensions absent is absent" used a TIFF, which
is now refused before `read_image` returns. The property still has a
reachable case -- a JPEG whose frame header never arrives -- and uses it.
- `asset_holds` in the accounting gate proved a carry by hashing the SOURCE
file, which a converted image's bundle cannot satisfy. It now also reads
the two digests the bundle states and HASHES THE ASSET ITSELF, so a bundle
claiming a conversion it did not perform still fails.
`tools/okf_asset_census.py` is the committed instrument for the
known-positive: one row per image, from two pinned trees. It was caught by
the rule it serves -- its first version handed `_pdf_images` the wrong page
object and reported 0 images over 67 PDFs with exit 0. The attribute is
asserted now and a known-positive runs before the sweep.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
README gains the partial-refusal paragraph and the soft-hyphen door
with its measured reach; CHANGELOG gets an Unreleased section over
this round; CLAUDE.md's open commitment "R761 is refused whole by
guard 1.4.0 ... that is the security repo's question" is replaced by
what was decided and built, with the alternatives that were felled and
the numbers behind each rule.
No version bump and no tag: `v0.10.1` is not tagged yet and releasing
is the operator's.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Round 3 of the 0.10.1 review, and the finding is the pattern the three rounds
share: each bound an OUTPUT, and the bomb stepped one link along. The
declared size, then the first `FlateDecode`, then every `FlateDecode` -- and
then a link this package had documented as safe.
`ASCII85Decode` was classed as bounded "by its own input because it shrinks".
It quadruples: `z` is the shorthand for four zero bytes. And the output was
never the cost -- `base64.a85decode` appends one 4-byte object per group to a
list, about a hundred bytes of memory per byte of INPUT (101.4x at 1 MiB,
96.1x at 4 MiB, 94.5x at 16 MiB on CPython 3.14).
Paired subprocesses, idle machine, both sides from PINNED trees, the document
built once by a third process and read from a file because `ru_maxrss` never
falls and `b"z" * 64 MiB` alone costs 171 MB:
[/Fl /A85] z x 32 Mi 33 475 B CARRIED 3 261 599 744 -> too_large 42 070 016
[/Fl /A85] z x 64 Mi 66 090 B CARRIED 6 461 558 784 -> too_large 40 280 064
[/A85] z x 8 Mi 8.4 MB CARRIED 933 085 184 -> too_large 62 484 480
[/Fl /A85 /Fl] z x 32 Mi 33 488 B samples_invalid 3 519 180 800 -> too_large 43 438 080
The picture was CARRIED in three of the four: not a bound that fired late, no
bound at all. Doubling the `z` run trebles the old cost and leaves the new one
where it was.
WHY THIS FORM. `assets.MAX_FILTER_DECODE_BYTES` (512 MiB) is what decoding ONE
link may cost -- a separate number from `MAX_IMAGE_BYTES`, because that one
bounds the picture and this one bounds producing it. `FlateDecode` is measured
as it is paid; every other permitted filter carries a MEASURED cost ratio
(`assets.PDF_FILTER_COST_RATIO`) checked against its input BEFORE its decoder
is called, since those decoders take a whole string and return a whole string.
A filter with no ratio is refused unread. The budget TRAVELS: a deflate link
is inflated under the smaller of the picture's bound and what the next link's
decoder may be handed, or `[/Fl /A85]` pays 256 MiB for a refusal.
A chunked ASCII85 decoder written here was the alternative and was FELLED: it
would bound `_check_stream_cost` and not the run, because `stream.get_data()`
decodes the whole chain again with pdfminer's own decoder, and it would make
this package rather than pdfminer the authority on an image's bytes. The cap
is the only number that bounds that. `resource.setrlimit(RLIMIT_AS)` was
MEASURED before anything was built on it, as the order required, and is not
usable: Darwin 26.6.2 raises `ValueError: current limit exceeds maximum limit`
and does not enforce it. No child-process cap exists.
THE CAP IS READ OFF THE CORPORA, the posture `MAX_IMAGE_PIXELS` has: over the
9 668 image objects of the 77 PDFs on this machine, 16 decode through an
ASCII85 link and the largest input to one is 450 739 bytes, against a cap of
about 5.0 MB.
A PROPERTY TEST REPLACES THE LIST OF KNOWN SHAPES: every chain of length 1-3
over the ten filters pdfminer decodes, 1 110 of 1 110, both payload fills,
each delivered under the bound or refused with a published code and never paid
for on the way (`tracemalloc`, which counts allocations and is not disturbed
by load). Known-positive beside it: 258 of 258 chains over the permitted
filters still carry a small image.
MAJOR -- the backstop had no test. `check_payload` at the end of
`_check_stream_cost` could be deleted with the whole suite green, because the
second one after `get_data()` gives the same code one step later. The two
differ in whether the payment was made, so the test asserts `get_data` was
never called.
10 OF 10 MUTANTS KILLED, control green, each killer named in the report. Four
survived a first pass and two tests exist because of it.
NOT ONE PICTURE CHANGES HANDS, MEASURED BY NAME: `_pdf_images` over every PDF
on this machine from both pinned trees -- 9 306 -> 9 306 carried over 77
files, 50 -> 50 on R761, 0 of 78 files moving a count and 0 moving a code.
R761 also settles a question raised while this order was open: 50 objects, 29
[/DCTDecode], 21 [/FlateDecode], 0 ASCII85 links -- so round 2's count of 580
`[/FlateDecode /ASCII85Decode]` objects is reproducible from nothing on this
machine. It changes no decision; a bomb shape does not need a corpus.
Version stays 0.10.1, no tag. README, CHANGELOG, CLAUDE.md and errors.py
corrected TO what the code does; the round-2 report carries a correction block
rather than a rewrite. Report:
docs/2026-09-18-utgangsbudsjett-per-ledd.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The two findings of the 18.09 PM checkpoint of `0f308c1`. Red tests landed
first in `3b587ea`; this is what turns them green.
BLOCKER -- `_check_inflated` read `filters[0]`, measured that one link and
returned, which is not a bound: a PDF decodes a stream through a LIST of
filters. Measured in paired subprocesses from two pinned trees, idle machine:
[/FlateDecode] 400 MB 408 516 B 59 232 256 -> 62 017 536 B
[/FlateDecode x2] 400 MB 1 636 B 886 554 624 -> 52 367 360 B
[/FlateDecode x3] 400 MB 1 070 B 889 393 152 -> 61 390 848 B
[/FlateDecode x2] 1,2 GB 2 927 B 2 567 204 864 -> 60 403 712 B
542 000x the file at two links, and the picture WAS refused at the end -- by
`check_payload` after `get_data()`, once the memory was spent. The single-link
row is the control and does not move. It also left the 16 corpus objects behind
an `[/ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode]` chain unmeasured, since `filters[0]` is not
`FlateDecode` there.
`_check_stream_cost` walks every link. THREE CLASSES and no fourth
(`extract.bounded_pdf_filters`, pinned by a test): `FlateDecode` MEASURED, a
link with another expanding link behind it inflated under the same bound and
handed on; `ASCII85Decode`/`ASCIIHexDecode` bounded by their own input because
they SHRINK; `DCTDecode`/`JPXDecode`/`JBIG2Decode` PASS THROUGH. Everything
else -- `LZWDecode`, `RunLengthDecode`, `CCITTFaxDecode`, `/Crypt`, anything
written later -- is refused UNREAD with a new code `asset_pdf_unbounded`,
decided before the FIRST link is decoded so a document cannot make the run pay
for the links in front of the one we cannot bound. An encrypted stream is
deciphered and then measured, where `stream.decipher is not None` used to
return unmeasured; 0 of 5 142 objects here are in an encrypted document, which
is why nothing caught it.
NOT ONE PICTURE CHANGES HANDS, AND IT IS MEASURED BY NAME. Every PDF on this
machine -- 78 documents, K2 in both trinn1 and trinn2, the shipped fixtures and
R761 -- run through `_pdf_images` page by page from both pinned trees:
images carried 9 356 -> 9 356
documents losing one 0 of 78
documents gaining one 0 of 78
asset_pdf_unsupported 322 -> 314
asset_pdf_unbounded 0 -> 8
The 8 are the 4 `CCITTFaxDecode` stencil masks (`/ImageMask true`,
`/BitsPerComponent 1`), counted twice because trinn1 and trinn2 hold the same
document. They were refused before and are refused now, one step earlier and
under a code that says why.
MAJOR -- `check_payload(len(data))` after `get_data()` is the counted refusal
four documentation surfaces point at, and deleting exactly that line passed all
2 132 tests. It is reachable through a stream pdfminer has ALREADY decoded
(`decode()` sets `rawdata` to `None`), which is now the ONLY case outside the
bound and has a test.
Eight mutations, one line each, every one DEAD, with the unmutated tree run
first as the control: first-link-only, loop dropped, inequality reversed,
encrypted skipped, backstop deleted, unknown filter passed through,
intermediate link not carried forward, whole check removed.
`tools/okf_accounting_gate.py` gains one line, the new code in
`REJECTION_CODES` -- what a rejection code requires and nothing more. Gate
unchanged: exit 1, GATE RED rows 2, 3, 6. Version stays 0.10.1, untagged.
Suite after `git add` against a clean tree: `uv run pytest -q` ->
2152 passed, 1 skipped (226 s). ruff, ruff format --check, mypy --strict clean.
Report: docs/2026-09-18-filterkjeden-og-backstoppen.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A second independent review read `230d1cb` -- the commit that closed the
`v0.10.0` review's two MAJOR findings -- and found one of them open. The
bound read `/Width` and `/Height`, which an untrusted document writes, while
`get_data()` pays for the stream beside them; `/Length` is the COMPRESSED
length and the two numbers are independent.
Re-measured here on `ed8d9d7` before anything changed, in its own
interpreter: a 408 516-byte PDF declaring 1x1 and carrying 400 MB of deflated
zeros was CARRIED, no rejection, 891 904 000 B peak RSS. After: 0 carried,
`asset_too_large`, 57 065 472 B. At 1,2 GB of zeros, 2 436 MB -> 64 569 344 B
-- the cost no longer scales with the bomb. End to end through the CLI with
the shipped defaults: 838 000 640 B and an asset written -> exit 0,
79 650 816 B, `0 carried of 1 found`, no `assets/`.
Three numbers are bounded now, not one: what a container DECLARES, what a
carried FILE measures (`read_image`, so a 49 MP PNG of 47 705 bytes is not
passed on to a consumer), and what a PDF stream DECOMPRESSES to
(`assets.inflated_size`, a chunk at a time, output discarded, before
`get_data()`). The limit is stated rather than implied: the stream
measurement runs where `FlateDecode` is the first filter and the document is
not encrypted; every other chain is a check on the decoded length AFTER the
decode, a counted refusal and not a bounded one.
A non-positive declared dimension is `asset_size_invalid`, its own code,
raised before the stream is read. `-1 x 40000000000` is a NEGATIVE pixel
count, under which every `>` bound read as satisfied, so the check returned
silently and the refusal arrived from `encode_png` as
`asset_samples_invalid`. Its own code because a publisher shipping a picture
bigger than this package carries and a dictionary written to be read wrong
are different facts about a document.
Two smaller findings in the line that says what is missing, both introduced
by the first fix: the address was written twice, once bare, and a linkifying
renderer autolinks a bare URL -- written once now, in one code span; and
`label` became a dead parameter, so the figure's caption was dropped, a
regression against 0.10.0. It is written again in the `-- <label>` form a
carried pointer uses.
Version bumped to 0.10.1 across all ten places. Nine were unbound and stale:
four README install lines naming the previous release, two prose lines, the
"current tag" entry, `uv.lock`, and a CHANGELOG whose 0.10.1 content sat
under `[Unreleased]`. Two new packaging tests bind them to `__version__`, and
the README's guard tag to `[tool.uv.sources]`.
Every test was red first. The fate of every image is identical with and
without the new bound on three K2 PDFs carrying 800 images (464/464, 311/311
with the same 12 rejections, 25/25), and the second inflate is below the
noise floor there. 0 shipped artifacts move: no bundle under `examples/`,
`skills/` or `tests/fixtures/` carries an image pointer at all, measured
against a known-positive control.
`asset_too_large` was undocumented in the error registry; both codes are
there now. `tools/okf_accounting_gate.py` gains the new code in its closed
list -- one string, no behaviour change, stated because that file belongs to
another order.
Suite 2141 passed / 1 skipped, ruff + format + mypy --strict clean.
Report: docs/2026-09-18-bildestien-holder-0-10-1.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The content accounting stays OPT-IN until the losses it reports on the
reference corpus are fixed; a default-on door would fail builds that pass
today. Of the three exceptions the gate proposed, only the PDF one
(heading, paragraph, table) is approved. Approving it moves no number,
because no witness counts a heading in a PDF: what it changes is that the
gap is a stated limit of the instrument rather than an open question
about the build. An image in a workbook, or in md/txt/csv/json/odt/rtf,
stays unaccounted and therefore stays red.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two MAJOR findings of the independent v0.10.0 review, both with the
shipped defaults, both new in 0.10.0. Repros rebuilt as tests first.
- A remote <img src>/xlink:href became a LIVE markdown image link in the
persisted concept, with the address and query string chosen by whoever
wrote the document. Extraction opens no socket; a consumer rendering
the bundle does. Now inert text with the address in a code span,
pinned by a property over the readers rather than by one string. The
tier asymmetry (user-upload refuses, trusted-source persisted) went to
the guard repo with the repro.
- Nothing bounded a declared image size: 9.6 KB of PDF declaring
3000x3000 grayscale zeros took 83 MB peak RSS, linear in pixels.
MAX_IMAGE_PIXELS (40 000 000) and MAX_IMAGE_BYTES (256 MiB) are read
off the corpora (largest measured 18.6 MP on K2, 1.4 MP on R761) and
checked on what the container declares, before any decompression;
over them is asset_too_large, counted. The same bound closes the
inline data: URI, which the review flagged and did not measure.
Also fixed, added by PM to this order: an inline PDF image was named
from id() of a Python object, so two concept files of the reference
corpus differed between builds. It is now named from its position.
R761 unchanged: 50 carried of 50 found, assets diff -rq clean.
Report: docs/2026-09-17-bildestien-0-10-1.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
okf build --accounting PATH inventories every source document before
extraction, in the gate's per-format vocabulary, and after the run gives
each element one fate (carried / pointer / coded rejection), written as
JSON and summarised in log.md. "carried" is checked against the written
concept bodies, so a gate that drops a line is found (test). Exit 1 on
anything unaccounted or double-booked. Opt-in: +744 s (+19 %) on the
43-document reference corpus, and that corpus fails the check on 24 real
losses (22 images on text-less PDF pages, 2 docx Title paragraphs).
Changed without the flag:
- okf build exits 1 when it extracted documents and persisted none.
Door B and corpus.measure are unchanged. One test relied on exit 0.
- An image file carried through a persisted document is its own K1b
column, no longer also extractor_unknown. The set is what the resolver
actually carried (ExtractedDocument.files), never a byte match.
tools/okf_accounting_gate.py (checks untouched) is green on all six rows,
R761 110 of 110 under both gates.
Report: docs/2026-09-17-innholdsregnskapet-bygget.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Until now no reader in this package fetched, named, described or copied a
single image. `<img>`'s attributes were never read, a NISO-STS `<graphic>`
was walked past, a PDF was opened for its text alone, the converter's
markdown writer dropped every picture, and the only writer into a bundle
took `content: str`. The two lossiness warnings said so on every run, which
made the loss honest and did not make it smaller.
Measured on R761 Prosesskoden:2025, published as a 701-page PDF and as a
NISO-STS delivery: the process text is carried in full while 12 `Tabell N-N`
and 9 `Figur N-N` captions stand over nothing, because that publisher ships
those tables as raster pictures in both. Process 84's "toleranseklasse ...
er gitt i tabell 84-2" points at empty space.
THE GATE WAS WRITTEN FIRST AND RED. `tests/test_asset_gate.py` reads its
denominator out of the source (`page.images`, `word/media/`, `ppt/media/`,
`<img`, `<graphic`), never from a constant here. Measured at 332961a, built
from `git archive` and not from the editable tree: carried 0 of 8 local
images across 5 documents (9 declared), and no `assets/` at all. After: 8 of
8, with the ninth a remote source carried as a pointer without a file.
FIVE READERS PLACE, ONE MODULE DECIDES. `assets.py` owns what an image is
(sniffed from the bytes, never from the claimed extension), what it is
called (`<sha256[:12]>-<the source's own basename>`) and how it is pointed
at (one two-line block, one regex). `.xlsx` is deliberately not a row: a
block inside its pipe tables would break the `source_rows` locator, and 0 of
4 K2 workbooks hold media.
A PDF stream that is already a file is carried VERBATIM (29 of R761's 50
objects are DCTDecode); raw samples are encoded to PNG with stdlib zlib, so
no new dependency. Rendering the page region was the alternative and was
felled on determinism: a rasterised crop's bytes, and therefore the asset's
content-addressed name and the bundle's digest, would depend on the
installed rasteriser. What the encoder cannot express exactly is refused
with a code and counted, never approximated.
NO SIZE FLOOR, and that is a measurement: over the 4 828 image objects of
the K2 corpus the size distribution is a broad spread with no gap, unlike
OCR_CID_SHARE's bimodal one, so a threshold would be a number we chose.
ON BY DEFAULT, AND THE CONTROL IS TWO WHOLE BUILDS. The 43-document
reference corpus at 332961a versus rebuilt at HEAD with `--no-assets`:
865 files on both sides, `diff -rq` reports ONE difference, the added
`Images: NOT CARRIED` line in log.md. Every concept byte-identical.
Against the default: 453 -> 454 concepts, 865 -> 867 md, 0 -> 2 964 assets
(2 964 carried of 3 145 found, 4 622 pointers), 4.7 MB -> 115 MB, 2 414 s ->
3 088 s, peak RSS 6.26 -> 8.74 GB, 422 of 865 md files differ. The one new
concept has a measured cause: the pointers are body text, so a section
holding 146 of that document's images grew from 19.0 % to 30.6 % of the
extracted text and crossed `--outline-gate`'s 0.20 share clause.
THE IMAGE BYTES ARE NOT SCREENED. The guard is text-only, the pointer block
passes the gate as body text, the picture beside it passes nothing, and
log.md says so on every run.
Also fixed, both found by measuring rather than by reading:
- a markdown image is no longer read as a cross-reference. `structure._LINK`
never looked at the character in front of the bracket, so every pointer
would have arrived in the index as an edge to a concept that cannot exist.
- Door C carries the assets its merged concepts point at. Before this,
importing a bundle built with `--assets` merged 6 of 6 concepts and wrote
no `assets/` at all, so every pointer named a missing file.
Report: docs/2026-09-17-bilder-i-bundlen-trinn1.md
Spec proposal: docs/plan/okf-assets-section-6-4.md
Suite 1 955 passed / 1 skipped (from 1 896), ruff and mypy --strict clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two defects reported from outside by claude-code-llm-wiki (order
20260915T202332Z-228694739), both reproduced against this tree before
anything moved.
F1 -- the packaged CLI never ran the guard. corpus.measure wired an
unconditional approve-everything stub into process_inbox and 0 of 90
add_argument calls named a gate, so the one path most people use screened
nothing while pyproject.toml made the guard a mandatory runtime dependency
and the README recommended a composition the command line could not reach.
--gate takes guard-trusted-source (default), guard-user-upload or none.
corpus.resolve_gate is the one name->callable map, with the guard imported
lazily so importing the package still does not pull it in; an unknown name
RAISES rather than falling back, because a fallback reproduces the defect
with an extra step. The gate's NAME goes into the section 9 log.md -- a
stub is only dangerous when nothing downstream can see it -- and --gate
none renders NOTHING WAS SCREENED.
The default was chosen on a measurement: over the 453 concept bodies of
the pinned reference bundle, PRESET_TRUSTED_SOURCE persists 453 of 453 and
PRESET_USER_UPLOAD holds 1, costing that concept's whole source document.
Neither tier waves anything through -- an invisible carrier and a CRITICAL
finding fail secure at both. Door B's library default is UNCHANGED at
PRESET_USER_UPLOAD: an inbox drop is an untrusted upload, an operator
pointing this command at their own folder is not. The second tier ships as
guard_adapter.inbox_gate_trusted_source, the three-line adapter that
module's docstring already described, never a preset parameter.
process_inbox(segmentations=..., gate=inbox_gate) now has a test. Before
this, `grep -rl inbox_gate tests/` gave 1 file with 0 occurrences of
`segment` -- the recommended composition was untested, which is how the
defect survived.
F2 -- a fenced code block declared structure. `# Use the opus[1m] alias`
inside a ```bash fence became a level-1 ATX heading: the document was
refused entirely where the line carried [ or ] (5 of 191 pages of the
reporter's corpus), and the concept TITLE came from somebody's shell session
on 62 of 191 (32.5 %). The fix is in the proposer and never in Door B's
title rule -- that rule is right, and a heading that was never a heading is
what has to stop being proposed. propose.fenced_lines is computed once per
text and no rule reads a fenced line, including Arm D's outline RUN, which
selects from the whole line list. Backtick and tilde fences, three leading
spaces, a closing fence at least as long as its opener, and no backtick in a
backtick fence's info string -- that last one keeps a line holding only
`okf build` from silencing a document.
MEASURED ON THE BYTES, and this is the number that decides: the 43-document
reference corpus built at b6da09c (from git archive, never the editable
tree) and rebuilt at the shipped defaults differ in log.md alone, by the one
added bullet. 865 concept files on both sides, every concept byte-identical.
Found by that control and NOT caused by this work: the pinned artifact
K2-bundle-default-20260912 was written 2026-09-09, two days before ed0418f
changed title: quoting, so it differs from what HEAD produces on 42 concept
files. test_default_bundle_pin stays green because it pins the count and the
hit@8 ranks, not the bytes. Re-pinning is the operator's call.
Suite 1896 passed / 1 skipped (+27 from 1869). ruff, ruff format and mypy
--strict clean. No version bump, no tag, no push.
Report: docs/2026-09-15-f1-f2-gaten-og-kodefencen.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The bundle-only gate returned UNMEASURED and exit 3 on the very arm it was
built for: no metric computable from a bundle alone reaches boundary recall.
`boundary_share` -- declared boundaries that became a concept, over declared
boundaries -- is the one metric measured that orders the arms correctly, and it
needs the publisher's own structure, so it arrives as an input.
Measurement first, threshold after, which is what the order asked for.
P1, the normalisation, derived rather than guessed: stripping all whitespace
and lowercasing reproduces the fasit's own `norm` from its own `title` on
2 761 of 2 761 rows (alphanumerics-only scores 58). P1's own bar is 99 % on the
known-good arm and the literal reading of it reaches 22 of 2 761 -- not because
the normalisation is wrong but because okf's default route moves the numbering
token a publisher glues into a heading over into the concept id. The pair form
(concept's own directory, residual title) reaches 2 737, either reaches 2 759
(99.9 %). Both forms ship and neither is a fallback: `r761-2025-d1` is the
control in the opposite direction at 2 727 literal, 0 paired.
P2, the single corpus, is in the OUTPUT and not only in the document: the bar
is declared `corpora = 1`, every boundary row prints `N = 1 corpus`, and the
line states that `--fasit` is the caller's ASSERTION that this bundle is a
build of the document the fasit describes -- the posture `okf consume --ref`
has. Measured: the K2 reference and `n100-2023` score 0 of 2 761 and read FAIL,
which is the assertion being wrong rather than the bundle being bad.
One bar, at the pinned artifact's own value, 2 759/2 761. It is tight and the
cost is published rather than tuned away: 2 of 4 R761 builds fall under it
(2 752 and 2 727), while any bar between 41.6 % and 98.8 % separates the
known-bad arm from every R761 build measured. The known-bad arm
(`860019-mdb-100`) is 1 148 of 2 761 -- FAIL and exit 1, where the bundle-only
gate gave exit 3.
A fasit is validated at the door: not a list, a row missing `title` or `norm`,
or anything that is not JSON exits 2 with the reason, never a quiet UNMEASURED.
A fasit under five rows is UNMEASURED -- the document floor in the fasit's own
unit.
Without `--fasit` the command is byte-for-byte what it was, held by a test.
`okf check` is untouched; no version bump and no tag. 17 tests red on
assertions before the implementation, the two new doc pins each driven red and
back. Suite 1 869 passed / 1 skipped / 1 870 collected (base 5e5d01c: 1 851).
docs/2026-09-12-g37-terskler.md SS 7 carries the premises re-measured, the
seven bundles, the interval any bar could sit in, and the honesty limits --
including the correction of SS 2's own grep claim, which went false in the
commit that wrote it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Version to 0.9.0 in pyproject.toml, __init__.py and uv.lock; CHANGELOG's
[Unreleased] becomes [0.9.0] - 2026-09-13, carrying G37's `okf quality` and
K3-26's README file-type table byte-identically. MINOR rather than patch: the
release adds a command.
README's four install lines and the two tag-pairing sentences move to v0.9.0,
and the tag history gains a `v0.9.0` entry stating what ships -- three
verdicts, two bars (.pdf 8/32, .docx 2/5), both regression bars against the
pinned reference and not quality claims, `okf check` untouched at seventeen
rules.
No behaviour change in src/ beyond the version string. The guard pin stays at
v1.4.0 and the dependency floor stays at >=1.2,<2.0. Suite 1 850 passed, 1
skipped, run after `git add`.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
G37. `okf check` is a CONTRACT check and a green one is not a quality gate:
measured 2026-09-10 by `vegnormal-okf`, three arms over one corpus all
returned 0 findings and exit 0 while their hit@k ranged from 6 of 6 to 0 of 6.
`okf quality <bundle>` asks the other question, per file type, with the
denominator on every line. A separate command rather than `okf check
--quality`, because the two answer different questions and a caller must not
be able to read one as the other. `okf check` is untouched.
Three verdicts and no fourth -- PASS, FAIL, UNMEASURED -- and a type with no
measured threshold is never PASS. Exit 0 judged and clean, 1 at least one
FAIL, 2 did not run, 3 nothing could be judged: exit 0 over a table of
unmeasured rows would be the silent pass this command exists to stop.
Two bars today, both `structure_null_share` (documents of a type yielding
exactly one concept), read off the pinned 43-document reference bundle: .pdf
8/32, .docx 2/5. Plus one definitional bar for every type, taken from the
harness's own degenerate-merge definition: 0 concepts with an empty body,
measured 0 of 8 602 concepts over four bundles. A bar needs five documents on
BOTH sides -- its own and the judged bundle's -- so .xlsx (2), .xml (1) and
every type with no corpus class in `extract._EVIDENCE` are UNMEASURED and
print their numbers without a verdict.
The floor on the judged bundle was found by RUNNING the gate, not by reading
it: one PDF cut into 2 182 concepts scored 0 of 1 against the 32-document
reference and read as PASS.
The gate walks the index tree and never a directory (SS 9.2; controlled
against the listing on four bundles, 453 / 2 761 / 3 206 / 446 either way),
and prints the bundle's own run log beside its counts -- a document rejected
at extraction leaves no row in the bundle, so the pinned corpus's 33 PDFs
show up as 32 and the two denominators must never be read as one.
Three of the order's five premises moved when re-measured, and they are in the
document rather than glossed: the four evidence corpora carry `source_file` on
0 of 446, 0 of 1 133, 0 of 270 and 0 of 2 756 concepts, so they name no file
type and cannot PASS; "41,6 %" is `vegnormal-okf`'s number and not in this
repository; and the same 828-document bundle carries two published hit@k
figures from two question sets.
Three candidate metrics measured and NOT shipped: duplicate titles within a
document (0 of 3 206 on the known-bad arm against 349 of 2 761 on the
known-good one) and short concepts (5.6 % against 14.6 %) order the two arms
the wrong way round; duplicate titles across the whole bundle order all four
correctly (37.8 / 16.3 / 12.6 / 5.7 %) and still ship without a bar, because
any bar separating them is read off the two bundles it would judge.
19 new tests, each rule exercised in both directions; the three README pins
were each driven red before being kept. Suite 1 850 passed, 1 skipped, 1 851
collected, run after `git add` -- +19 against a base of 1 832 collected,
measured on the stashed tree (STATE's 1 831 is one short of that).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`### Binary extraction` carried its own six-row Format/Reader/Evidence table
over the same rows the pinned table now holds. It was true when written and
reachable by exactly the failure this module exists for: three evidence classes
copied into prose no test reads. That section now points at the pinned table
and keeps its prose about the extra.
A fifth assertion in `tests/test_docs_promises.py` holds the duplicate gone.
Known-positive: the same query finds 8 table lines in that section on the
previous commit, so it can go red.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The extractor registry reads 13 extensions. The README's opening line named
five of them, and the full list existed only in a hidden
`<!-- extract-formats: ... -->` comment, which no reader reads -- so the README
undersold what the code does and stated no evidence class anywhere a consumer
would look.
A `## Supported file types` table now carries one row per extension: reader,
dependency (core or the `[extract]` extra), the evidence class `_EVIDENCE`
records for the row, and one honest note. The three `constructed` office rows
carry their denominators (N = 1, N = 2, N = 1) in the table itself, so a row
that has met no document anyone wrote cannot read as a supported one; `.htm`
does not borrow `.html`'s 828-file class, because the code records none for it.
A `Not read today` section states the absences (`.doc`, `.epub`, `.eml`/`.msg`,
image files, source files, `.one`/`.vsd`) as facts, not as a queue.
Test first, red before the table existed: four assertions in
`tests/test_docs_promises.py` pin the table's row set to
`_CORE_EXTRACTORS | _OPTIONAL_EXTRACTORS`, each evidence cell to `_EVIDENCE`
(and to a fixed `stdlib, no corpus class` where the code records none), the
core/extra split to the registries, and the opening to the table.
No change to `extract.py` and no version bump: nothing about what is read
moved, only what the README says about it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Version to 0.8.5 in pyproject.toml, __init__.py and uv.lock; CHANGELOG's
[Unreleased] becomes [0.8.5] — 2026-09-12, carrying K3-23's instrument,
K3-25's default and K3-24's block-sources fix byte-identically, with the
two `### Changed` headings merged into one and one post written here: what
`okf.parse_frontmatter` now returns for a block `sources:` is a READING
projection PyYAML reads back on 0 of 4 605 measured block files.
No behaviour change in src/ beyond the version string. The guard pin stays
at v1.4.0 and the dependency floor stays at >=1.2,<2.0.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`link_in_signal` defaults to `False` on all three entry points --
`searchable_text`, `concept_scores` and `build_payload` -- through one named
constant, `DEFAULT_LINK_IN_SIGNAL`. This carries out K3-23's recommendation
(alternative c), and its numbers are the whole warrant: of the newcomers the
door's `Enclosing section:` line ever added a question token to, 39 of 39
gained it from the bundle-absolute PATH and 0 of 39 from the link's title, and
every token the path contributed is a segment of the document's own directory
-- the saturation `shared_id_prefix` takes out of the id signal, back in
through the body.
A CONSTANT rather than three naked literals, chosen against the module: the
other eight defaults here are constants (`DEFAULT_PROFILE`, `DEFAULT_LIMIT`,
`DEFAULT_TIE_SHARED_RANK`, `DEFAULT_STEM_PREFIX`, `DEFAULT_TITLE_COVERED`,
`DEFAULT_SOURCE_QUOTA`, `DEFAULT_FOLLOW_PARENT`, `DEFAULT_K`) and this was the
one default spelled out three times. It also lets a test fall on the rule from
the module that owns it.
NO CLI flag is added and none is changed. `grep -n '"--.*link'` over `src/`
gives 0 hits before and after, and `consume.main` never passed the parameter,
so the CLI inherits the function default. A flag was considered and NOT added,
because no caller could be named that needs the older reading: the three call
sites outside `consume.py` (`skill.py:360`, `tools/okf_consume_measure.py:155`
and `:247`) all inherit it deliberately.
Measured before landing: 0 of 5 shipped bundles carry the door's line
(denominators 446, 1 133, 270, 2 756, 2 761 concept files) and 5 of 5 payloads
are byte-identical across the move. The consumer repository was read only and
its tree is unchanged, listing identical including mtimes.
The docstrings move with the code rather than after it. `concept_scores` said
this was "an INSTRUMENT, not a flag and not a default" and `build_payload` that
it "carries no CLI flag"; the first is now false and the second still true, and
each says so. `cli.DEFAULT_SHELL_PARENT` keeps its value and loses its reason:
the cost it cited -- delivered sets moving through that path -- is what this
commit removes, so the comment now states why it stays off NOW, which is N = 1
document and a consumption half nobody has judged. README and CLAUDE.md carry
the same sentence where they already describe the line, measured rather than
written on reflex: neither said anything about the ranking before.
One test changed with the code. The characterisation of what the LINE does
called `concept_scores` with no parameter, because the reading it characterises
used to be the default; it now names that reading. Same fixture, same number.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`_render_sources` gave three measured reasons for refusing to emit the block
form. Two of them fell with `28f9a4b` and are struck rather than left
standing: a block list no longer round-trips to an empty value (4 609 of
4 609 concept files), and B6's acceptance test can now pass.
Reason 2 STANDS and now carries the emission rule alone, re-measured by
reading `portfolio-optimiser` at `6eb58e5`: `read_provenance` returns
`UnreadableProvenance(reason="block-sequence")` for a block value. It is not
the guard's objection -- guard 1.4.0 reads the block form on 4 609 of 4 609
of the same files -- so the answer to "should our own emitter write block" is
NO, with the number that carries it, and the measurement that would make it
decidable is named in STATE rather than deferred without one.
The README paragraph said this library "cannot read the block form" where one
reader could and one could not. It now separates the two by KEY: `sources` in
either form through every reader, every other block mapping still refused,
with the D1b pointer intact.
Report: 222 lines, S7 form. Five deviations first, including the acceptance
sentence naming THREE flat readers rather than one, a `title` denominator of
7 372 rather than 5 372, and the `okf check` rule answered NO with a
measurement (`contract_check` holds 0 occurrences of `sources`, and
`consume` already writes `sources_unreadable` for the state a rule would
restate; `len(RULES)` is 17). Honesty limits name the one-key-wide set, the
block `verified:` fixture still reading empty, and the rendering not being
byte-identical to the source.
Suite 1807 passed / 1 skipped, rc 0, 98 s.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Version 0.8.3 -> 0.8.4 in pyproject.toml, __init__.py and uv.lock, and the
guard pin in [tool.uv.sources] moved from v1.3.0 to v1.4.0 (uv.lock follows
via `uv lock`: the guard's version, source and requires-dist lines, nothing
else). CHANGELOG [Unreleased] closed as [0.8.4] with K3-21's and K3-22's
entries moved as written, plus one entry for the guard pin: 1.4.0 parses a
flow sequence of plain scalars that 1.3.0 refused (26 of 28 frontmatter
blocks refused by 1.3.0, 0 of 28 by 1.4.0, on one five-document bundle).
Dependency range llm-ingestion-guard>=1.2,<2.0 unchanged.
README: the four install lines and llms.txt's one to @v0.8.4, the guard
pairing prose to v0.8.4 / v1.4.0, the pip fallback to @v1.4.0, a v0.8.4
row as the current tag (seventeen checker rules), and the suite count
(1783 collected, 1782 passed, 1 skipped) with its history extended.
No behaviour change in src/ beyond the version string.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The record for K3-21 A-D: what an excerpt, a heading-only body, the checker
and the index now carry, and every gate with its denominator -- the pinned K2
bundle (7 passed in each export), 32 regression payloads, R761 with and
without `--shell-parent` (hit@1/8/50 6/6 at both k, the known-positive at
rank 1, 675 of 710 shells with exactly one link and 0 broken, 710 of 710
pointing at the source's own ancestor after D), consumption 6 of 6 in both
forms, the byte cost against the consumer's 51.0 %, the ranking cost the
link's path carries, and the 35 shells with no ancestor holding text, listed.
Deviations from the order stated first; honesty limits last.
CHANGELOG under Unreleased; README and CLAUDE.md say 710 of 710, 17 rules,
and that the outline mark keeps its depth. The README's project measurement
was re-run (26 concepts, 0 checkout paths, `okf check` 17 rules, 0 findings).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
K3-21 C. `resolve_structure` asks `_segment_lookup` first for a `parent`
edge: `(source_file, segment_id)` -> concept name, keyed off each concept's
own frontmatter (`DocumentStructure.declared`, no file read again), so a
pointer lands only inside the pointing concept's document -- `p1` exists in
every document of a multi-document bundle. A value no segment answers to is a
document number and is looked up exactly as before; a pointer naming nothing
keeps `UNRESOLVED_MARKER`. The rendering rule is untouched: a resolved
relation renders as its subject, so `parent: p1977?` becomes `parent: p1977`.
Moved on purpose, each named: both segmented goldens' index files
(`examples/ingest-golden-segmented{,-okf-v0-2}/expected-bundle/krav/1-{1,2}/
index.md`), whose declared parents s1 and s2 -> s0 rendered `parent: s0?`
while s0 stood in the bundle -- four lines, `?` removed. The four goldens
`test_the_four_existing_goldens_are_untouched` guards are not among them.
`skills/okf-consume/` regenerated, because the golden's index bytes -- and so
its ref -- moved. `test_shell_parent`'s byte test now expects the resolved
facet. README and CLAUDE.md no longer say the index renders it unresolved.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
K3-21 B. The second form of `parent`: `okf consume --follow-parent`
(`consume.attach_parent_text`) puts the enclosing concept's text inside an
excerpt's `parent`, with that concept's own `sha256` so a claim resting on it
is cited as that concept. It runs AFTER the cut, on the room the cut left, in
rank order, so the delivered set, its order, the withheld list and the
denominators are the same with the flag as without it -- inherited text
cannot displace an excerpt, the mechanism a consumer measured when copied-in
ancestor text pushed the right section to withheld place 504 and 1 069. A
text that does not fit is cut to the longest prefix that does and marked
`truncated`; a parent the payload already holds, or one a higher-ranked
excerpt already carried, travels once. OFF; the defaults are chosen on the
measurement that follows this commit.
`delivered_text` is the one normalisation an excerpt's `text` and a parent's
share. Contract SS 8 point 6 gains the MAY; the template tells the reader
what `text`, `sha256` and `truncated` mean. README and CLAUDE.md name the
flag.
Moved on purpose: the SS 7.4 known-positive again (14 455 / 14 083 / 372 ->
14 721 / 14 346 / 375), and `skills/okf-consume/` regenerated with it.
`tests/test_parent_text.py::test_no_room_means_no_text_and_no_lost_excerpt`
changed from its red form: it asked through `build_payload` at `limit ==
spent`, where the knapsack's 500 B buckets admit nothing at all
(`budget_admits_nothing`); it now holds the rule at `attach_parent_text`.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
K3-21 A. `okf consume` resolves a concept's `parent:` pointer -- a
`segment_id`, unique only inside one document's plan -- among the concepts
sharing its `source_file` (`consume.link_parents`, one pass, no file opened
again) and an excerpt carries `parent: { concept_id, title }`. Conditional
like `req_number`: a concept with no `parent` key moves no byte. A pointer
that lands nowhere is named `parent_unresolved: true`, never dropped.
The door writes ONE line into a heading-only body whose entry has a parent:
`Enclosing section: [<title>](/<bundle-relative path>)` (SPEC SS 5.1 lineage
through links, SS 6.1 the recommended absolute form and the kind in the
prose). Only such a body, so the segmented goldens' declared parents -- bodies
holding text -- are untouched. Appended AFTER structure derivation and
screened on its own (`_screened`, the `description` rule): read as body text
the link was derived into a second, unresolved `references` edge, measured on
the fixture. `segmentation.heading_only` is the one predicate the proposer and
the door share.
`okf check` gains its seventeenth rule, `parent_unfollowable`: a `parent`
that is not a concept_id and title, names its own excerpt, or names a concept
in neither `excerpts` nor `withheld` (together every considered concept).
Contract SS 8 point 6 added, the figure carries `parent`, and "additional
members are not read by the checker" now says the checker reads only the
members SS 8 names. The template tells the reader what `parent` is and that
SS 2.2 lets it read that one concept; `skill.CONDITIONAL_FIELDS` gains
`parent`. README and CLAUDE.md say what consume now reads.
Moved on purpose, each named: the SS 7.4 known-positive IS the contract
document, so `budget.known_positive` moves in every payload (13 238 / 12 893
/ 345 -> 14 455 / 14 083 / 372); `skills/okf-consume/` regenerated from the
segmented golden, whose plan declares s1 and s2 under s0 -- its example
payload now carries both parents; `test_bundle_identity` 16 -> 17 rules;
`test_shell_parent`'s byte test also accounts for the link line.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
K3-22's report, CHANGELOG under [Unreleased], and two corrections of a
sentence measured false.
README and CLAUDE.md both said of the flow form "both are valid YAML, and a
real YAML consumer recovers the same structure from either". An unquoted URL
with a query string inside a flow mapping is not valid YAML for PyYAML, and
the quoted form is refused by the pinned guard; the paragraph now states the
limit. CLAUDE.md also records the K3-22 invariant and the new refusal of a
`--frontmatter` flow value with such a leaf.
Measured, fix `ed0418f` against base `0308169`, each tree built twice from
frozen exports: five-document project 0 files moved; R761 XML and HTML 1 line
each; K2 default 42 `title` lines, after which 454 of 454 frontmatters parse
and read back the same (base 413 parse, 412 read back). hit@k on R761 base =
fix, S1-S6 6/6 at hit@1/8/50 at both k, KP rank 1; okf check 32 of 32 payloads
0 findings over 16 rules; K2 pin 7 passed in the export.
Found outside the order: the pinned guard refuses nearly every segmented
concept okf writes, on its scalar flow sequences (`source_offset`,
`references`, `derived`) -- identical before and after, so older than K3-22.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Tag K3-19 and K3-20 together: a NISO-STS document's own identity names
its directory and titles its sources entry, --frontmatter KEY=VALUE and
description from a section's first spec point, and the consume fix that
keeps a leading directory every concept id shares out of the first
fusion signal. K3-19 alone dropped the known-positive from rank 1 to not
delivered; K3-20 A is what makes the identity safe to ship.
Version 0.8.2 -> 0.8.3 in pyproject.toml, __init__.py and uv.lock (uv
lock changed that one line only). CHANGELOG [Unreleased] closed as
[0.8.3] with its five entries moved unchanged. Five install lines move to
@v0.8.3, the tag history gains a v0.8.3 row, and the suite count is
re-measured: 1668 collected, 1667 passed, 1 skipped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A plan entry whose span holds its heading alone gets `parent_id` naming the
nearest preceding entry at a smaller level whose own span holds text, passing
over an ancestor that is empty too; the door writes the existing `parent:`
key. Nothing is copied and no boundary moves. The rule reads the plan's level
and order, never the row. Off by default: `okf consume` reads no `parent`
key, so no payload ranks differently, while the flag moves the bytes of every
bundle holding a heading-only section.
Measured before building on one 2 761-concept process code: 710 concepts are
heading-only; the level route names the ancestor the document's own <sec>
nesting names on 708 of 710 (two sit at depth 7, clipped to 6, and point one
level too high), where reading section numbers gets 686 (`12` begins with
`1`); 35 have no ancestor holding text and get none.
The red test expected only concept files to move. The index is a projection
of the frontmatter and shows the key as a facet, so the test now holds both;
the facet renders a segment id as unresolved (`p1?`), because `structure`
reads `parent` as a document number -- named in README, CLAUDE.md and the
CHANGELOG, not repaired here.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The report for K3-19, measured from a frozen export of 77e7cab: R761 from the
base 56b00e7 against 77e7cab -- directory `14ce59dc-...` -> `r761-prosesskoden`,
2 761 concepts and 710 shells unchanged, 110 = 110, 1 807 descriptions, the
flagged edition and address on 2 761 of 2 761, hit@1/8/50 over S1-S6 6/6 at
both k, `okf check` 4 of 4 with 0 findings, and --ingested-at alone
confirmed on 2 761 of 2 761.
Reported first rather than repaired: the known-positive falls from rank 1 to
not delivered at the default k (13 at k = 50), decomposed to the directory
name alone; and the order's own `sources` value is refused by PyYAML on every
concept while `okf check` accepts it.
CHANGELOG under [Unreleased], the README and CLAUDE.md paragraphs carry the
final numbers, and the README test count moves to 1659 collected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
K3-19 c. The NISO-STS reader records, per titled <sec>, the FIRST <p> of its
FIRST direct-child <sec sec-type="spec"> as `OutlineMark.description`. The
plan entry carries it (`description`, only where the source has one, so every
other row's plan keeps its bytes), `parse_segmentation_plan` refuses an empty,
multi-line or non-string value, and the door writes it as the concept's
`description` after the gate has seen it: it is document text persisted
outside the body the gate screens, so it is kept only on the non-blocking
floor and as the sanitized text.
SPEC SS 4.1 makes `description` RECOMMENDED and sets no length, in SS 4.1,
SS 8 or SS 11. The limit is ours and structural -- one paragraph, whole --
because a cut inside it writes a sentence the source never wrote. Measured on
R761: 2 026 of 2 761 titled sections carry a direct-child spec point; the
first <p> runs 17 / 109 / 273 / 521 / 942 characters (min / median / p90 /
p99 / max). A section with none gets no key; nothing is derived from the
title. A stated `--frontmatter description=...` replaces it.
The extracted text does not move: the description is read beside it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
K3-19 b. `okf build --frontmatter KEY=VALUE`, repeatable, split on the FIRST
'=' (`cli.frontmatter_from_flags`) because a publisher's address carries '='
itself. The value is written verbatim on ONE line: the block form of a
`sources` list is invisible to this package's line-oriented readers, so the
flow form is the only one that survives them. Also reachable as
`build(frontmatter=...)`, `measure(concept_frontmatter_values=...)`,
`process_inbox(concept_frontmatter_values=...)` and
`render_inbox_concept(concept_frontmatter_values=...)`, keyword-only with
defaults, so every existing call site is source-compatible.
Precedence: a stated value beats what the document declares, which beats the
file name. A run may ADD any key and REPLACE only `sources` and
`description` -- the two with a derived layer below the flag. Every other key
the door writes is refused by `inbox.validate_concept_frontmatter` before a
proposal is written (`run_frontmatter_invalid`): measured from the bytes, owned
by another argument, the ownership stamp a later run reads back (including
Door A's `ingest_manifest`, which would make that door claim a Door B file),
or a derived facet whose `derived` marker would go on naming a replaced value.
A value that would not read back as stated -- empty, multi-line, or padded,
since `parse_frontmatter` strips -- is refused too.
SPEC SS 4.1 "Extensions" lets a producer add any key and SS 11 forbids a
consumer to reject one. Without the flag nothing moves: a test holds the
flagged tree to the plain one minus exactly the stated line.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
K3-19 a. `extract.declared_identity` reads what a NISO-STS document states
about itself -- exactly one <std-ident> (<doc-number>, <year>) and exactly one
<title-wrap> (<full>, else <main>) -- and returns None for every other row,
for XML that is not STS, for an unparseable file, and for a document that
states neither. A value stated more than once is not read: an adopted
standard carries one <std-ident> per issuing body, and picking one is a guess.
`okf build` names a document's directory from its <doc-number> through the id
grammar, replacing only the file's stem. A declared name another document in
the run also claims falls back to the file name for both, said on stderr: the
existing collision gate would refuse both with "rename one", and a name read
from inside a document is not one a rename can change.
`sources[0].title` becomes <doc-number> + <year>, then the <title-wrap>
title, then the file name -- the first that survives the gate and can be
written into the flow mapping verbatim. Measured on R761, <full> carries a
comma, which ends a flow mapping, so it is never the title there; it is never
cleaned up either. `resource` stays the inbox-relative file.
Every other row, and every profile without an address, is untouched: the
identity is asked for only where `sources` is written.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The version moves to 0.8.2 in pyproject.toml, __init__.__version__ and
uv.lock (one line; `uv lock` touched no other package). CHANGELOG's
[Unreleased] becomes [0.8.2] -- 2026-09-11 with the entries K3-15, K3-17
and K3-18 wrote, unedited. The five install lines (README x4, llms.txt)
point at @v0.8.2; the guard pairing prose names v0.8.2, whose own
[tool.uv.sources] still pins guard v1.3.0; the tag history gains a v0.8.2
row and v0.8.1 stops being "the current tag". Test count re-measured on
2026-09-11: 1603 collected, 1602 passed, 1 skipped.
What the release delivers to a consumer on a tag: `okf check`'s sixteenth
rule (bundle_mismatch), which v0.8.1 does not carry, the --title-covered
stop beneath a title that answers more, and the regenerated
skills/okf-consume/. No behaviour change in src/ beyond the version string.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The hand-filled skill predated `okf skill`, declared no bundle identity,
and was refused by the checker it tells its reader to run, against the
payload shipped beside it:
NOT conformant: 16 rules over 3 excerpts and 0 withheld entries, 1 findings
bundle_mismatch: the skill declares no readable bundle identity, ...
It is now the generator's output for
examples/ingest-golden-segmented-okf-v0-2/expected-bundle, the bundle the
payload always came from:
conformant: 16 rules over 3 excerpts and 0 withheld entries, 0 findings
The payload's bytes do not move. --force and --example-question are both
required: without the question the payload is a different one (spent
2125 -> 1420, delivered 3 -> 2, withheld 0 -> 1) and the byte test fails.
`okf skill` writes the bundle root and the skill path absolute when --out
is not under .claude/skills/, so the checkout prefix is stripped in one
mechanical step that a test holds; the generator is unchanged.
The frontmatter name becomes b-golden-segmented-okf-v0-2-consume. Claude
Code takes a project skill's command from its directory, which stays
okf-consume, and nothing in this repository named the skill by name.
references/README.md is rewritten by hand with the full regeneration
command; living prose in README, CLAUDE.md, the test comment and the
skill.py docstring is corrected, dated journals are left as written.
Report: docs/2026-09-11-k3-runde18-konsumskillen-regenerert.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Round 16's partition read every concept whose WHOLE title the question
accounts for before everything the fusion ranked above it. That is a claim
about the covered title's PRECISION, and it overrode the fusion even against
a title answering MORE of the question. Measured on a 26-concept bundle of
five documents: the question names a section by three title tokens and holds
a neighbour's whole one-token title (1 of 9 question tokens); the fusion put
the named section at rank 1, the partition moved the neighbour over it.
A covered concept now RISES through the fusion's order and stops beneath the
first concept whose title answers more question tokens, by equality, than it
holds, or beneath a covered concept the fusion put above it. With nothing
above it answering more it reaches the top exactly as before. Same flag
(--title-covered / --no-title-covered), no new parameter, no new constant.
Measured before this commit, delivered ranks from build_payload:
- known-negative: rank 2 -> 1; the payload equals --no-title-covered's
- three own probes on that bundle: 1, 1, 1 (unchanged from round 16)
- R761 XML, 2 761 concepts: hit@1/8/50 6/6 - 6/6 - 6/6 at default k and at
--k 50, KP rank 1; 8 of 8 payloads byte-identical to 7cca9e0 at BOTH k
- payloads byte-identical to 7cca9e0: K2 pinned 6/6, Arm B 6/6, N100/N200/
N500 15/15; tests/test_default_bundle_pin.py 7 passed, file untouched
- candidates measured beside it: min title length (R761 hit@1 3/6), share of
the question (holds only for 1/9 < s <= 1/6), order inside the group
(group of one: no effect), stop list (no title involved is one)
Suite on the staged set: 1600 passed, 1 skipped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`okf check` had fifteen rules and none asked whether the skill and the payload
were talking about the same bundle. Reproduced on this HEAD before any code
moved: three pairs reported `conformant: 15 rules over 8 excerpts and 438
withheld entries, 0 findings` -- a skill generated from one corpus against
another corpus's payload, the unfilled template against that payload, and a
payload sharing the skill's `bundle_id` at a foreign `ref`. All three now exit 1
with one `bundle_mismatch` finding over 16 rules.
BOTH halves are compared and the `ref` half is load-bearing: three distinct
builds on this machine carry one `bundle_id`, so an id comparison would pass a
stale skill. SS 3.3: "a version is the producer's assertion; a ref is a fact
about bytes". An identity the rule cannot read is a finding, never a silent
pass -- that is what refuses the unfilled template.
No new field: the identity was already in the generated skill's prose, now
factored into `skill.identity_line` and read back by
`contract_check.skill_identity`. Generated skill bytes unchanged, measured on
both tracked bundles on one interpreter.
The rule's first real find is this repository's own hand-made
`skills/okf-consume/SKILL.md`, which predates `okf skill` and declares no
identity a reader can act on: 1 of 1. Nine tests that asserted the old, false
conformance now pair a skill with its own bundle's payload.
Measured, nothing else moved: `~/okf-test/dokumenter` `diff -r` empty old
source vs new on one interpreter (52 files, 26 concepts), `okf project` still
byte-equal to `okf build`, K2 pin unmodified and green (453 concepts, ranks
1,1,1,1,1,5), known-negative `{}` unchanged at 9 findings.
Report: docs/2026-09-10-k3-runde15-bundle-mismatch.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A patch release carrying round 16's ranking rule and nothing else. No
behaviour changes in `src/`: the version string is the only line touched
there, and it is touched because it is the second half of the version --
`tests/test_packaging.py` holds `pyproject.toml`'s declaration and
`__init__.__version__` equal, and a tag whose package reports the previous
number lies to every consumer that installs it.
- `pyproject.toml` and `src/llm_ingestion_okf/__init__.py`: 0.8.0 -> 0.8.1.
- `CHANGELOG.md`: round 16's own entry closes as `[0.8.1]`, with a new empty
`[Unreleased]` above it and no comparison link, because the file has
published none since `[0.6.0]`. The entry gains one bullet it did not
carry: the rule's MEASURED DOWNSIDE, reproduced here on a five-document
folder -- a constructed known-negative question demotes the answering
section from delivered rank 1 to rank 2 because a neighbouring concept
titled with a single common process word has its WHOLE title accounted
for. Written as a known limitation of short generic titles, not as a fix.
- The five install lines (`README.md` 4, `llms.txt` 1) move to `@v0.8.1`.
Measured after: `okf.git@v0.8.0` 0 hits, `okf.git@v0.8.1` 5 hits as the
known-positive control, and the two remaining bare `v0.8.0` occurrences
are the tag-history row and the test-count history -- both are statements
about the past and both stay.
- The tag-history list gains `v0.8.1` as the current tag and demotes the
`v0.8.0` row to what it was; `v0.7.0` is untouched, and `docs/` is not
rewritten at all.
- The test-count history sentence named the `v0.8.0` release as the last
one and would have become false on this tag: it now records 1582 through
`v0.8.1` as well. The published figures 1583 collected / 1582 passed /
1 skipped were re-measured here and stand.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The report, the CHANGELOG entry under [Unreleased] and the README's ranking
section. No version bump and no tag: v0.8.0 was released this same day.
R761, delivered ranks, before -> after: hit@1/8/50 3/6 - 5/6 - 5/6 -> 6/6 -
6/6 - 6/6 at default k and 3/6 - 5/6 - 6/6 -> 6/6 - 6/6 - 6/6 at --k 50, with
the known-positive at rank 1 on all four and the known-negative still not a
hit. --no-title-covered on the new binary reproduces the old row exactly.
Nothing else moves, measured on the bytes: the pinned K2 bundle and Arm B keep
(1,1,1,1,1,5) with payloads byte-identical on 6 of 6 questions each,
n100/n200/n500 payloads byte-identical on 5 each, the 828-file HTML corpus at
828 plans / 0 unreadable / 6 015 md with diff -rq empty, the five-document
folder diff -r-identical at 26/52, and okf project still byte-equal to okf
build.
README's test count corrected to what this round measures: 1583 collected,
1582 passed, 1 skipped. The published 1575 was the passed count.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Round 13 (the `.xml` core file type read as NISO-STS, and the PDF arm's
collision counter) and round 14 (a section the source DECLARES takes the
declared-structure route: `.xml` goes from 15 of 2 761 to 2 761 of 2 761
boundaries and from 23 to 2 761 concepts at the shipped defaults, hit@1/8/50
0/6 - 0/6 - 0/6 to 3/6 - 5/6 - 6/6) are both landed. This commit adds no
functionality: it sets the version, closes the CHANGELOG entry, and points
every install line at the new tag.
- `pyproject.toml` and `src/llm_ingestion_okf/__init__.py`: 0.7.0 -> 0.8.0.
The second is the only line in `src/` this release touches. It is not a
code change but the other half of the version, written without a `v`
prefix, so a search for `v0.7.0` cannot find it;
`test_packaging.py::test_the_declared_version_agrees_with_the_packaged_one`
is what did. Left alone, the tag would report the previous release to every
consumer that installs it.
- `CHANGELOG.md`: `[Unreleased]` becomes `[0.8.0] - 2026-09-10`, with a new
empty `[Unreleased]` above it. The entries are round 13's and round 14's own
words, unchanged. No compare link is added: this file has carried none since
`[0.6.0]`, and inventing one here would be a claim about a URL nobody checked.
- The five install lines and the two prose lines naming the current tag move to
`v0.8.0`. The tag history list gains a `v0.8.0` row as the current tag and
KEEPS the `v0.7.0` row: that list states it is not install lines, so a
rewrite would delete history rather than update it.
- README's test count was 1515, measured 2026-09-09; this tree measures 1575
passed / 1 skipped with ruff 0.16.6. The surrounding sentence about the
earlier figure is repaired too, because changing the date alone would have
made it false.
`v0.7.0` stays on 1260fac. No lock change, no history rewrite in `docs/`.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
GREEN on the twelve tests from the two commits before it. `.xml` joins
`_CORE_EXTRACTORS` beside `.html`, and 110 of 110 unreadable becomes a bundle.
A CORE type, not an `[extract]` one, because the parser is stdlib: putting it
behind the extra would make a pure-stdlib file type binary-dependent for no
gain. And never through the converter, which the existing fence test now says
in one more line: a file routed there is read by a second parser that never
sees this reader's DTD refusal, so the hardening would be true of the code and
false of the file.
TWO PATHS, NAMED RATHER THAN GUESSED. STS when the root is `<standard>` or the
document holds any `<sec>`; generic otherwise. Generic XML keeps its text in
document order and gets NO structure -- an element name is never promoted to a
heading, because an RSS feed is not a numbered standard.
THE GRAMMAR IS MARKDOWN, the same markdown the office rows and round 11's HTML
row reach the proposer through, and `propose.py` is untouched. `<sec>` with a
`<title>` becomes one ATX line carrying `<label>` + space + `<title>` at its
own nesting depth; `<sec>` with only a `<label>` becomes a body line with the
label in front, the way `li` is treated in HTML -- 4 954 of R761's 7 715 are
lettered points and one heading each would bury its own 2 761; `<table-wrap>`
becomes its label plus ONE markdown table through this package's own
`render_table`, separator line included, which is what makes it a block.
TWO CHOICES THAT ARE MEASUREMENTS, not preferences:
- Inline by ALLOWLIST, block by default -- the inverse of the HTML reader,
because block-versus-inline is a property of HTML and XML has no such
universal. Assuming block is safe (an extra break never removes text and a
boundary needs a line that matches a grammar); assuming inline is not. The
allowlist is load-bearing: that document carries 1 701 `<italic>` and
1 396 `<bold>` inside its prose.
- The ATX ceiling is 6 and STS nesting reaches 7. The depth is CLIPPED, not
dropped: 9 of the 2 761 titled sections sit at depth 7 and `#######` matches
nothing, so dropping loses the section while clipping keeps the boundary and
states the nesting one level too shallow.
A DTD IS REFUSED UNPARSED, and that is a guarantee about this code rather than
about the machine. Measured on this interpreter (3.14.0, pyexpat 2.7.3): an
external SYSTEM entity is refused by the stdlib and never fetched, but the
amplification limit that stops a billion-laughs comes from libexpat >= 2.4.0
and NOT from Python -- five levels still expand -- while `pyproject.toml`
requires only `>=3.10` and no lockfile pins an interpreter. `XMLParser` exposes
no `.parser` attribute on the C accelerator, so the handler route is not
portable either. NO new dependency: `defusedxml` and `lxml` both occur 0 times
in `uv.lock` and still do.
pytest -q: 1566 passed, 1 skipped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
