The operator approved the whole D-A bundle on 2026-07-25: the four spec
corrections (C-F2/C-F3/C-F4/C-F5), brief §7 (the projection contract over the
ledger), and the C-P1 collision resolved by RE-SCOPING semantic retrieval
rather than amending the frozen "structural, never textual" rule.
This is D7's contribution to the text, not the decision itself (that is
protocolled in the main repo's shared queue) and not the amendment (shared/ is
a PULL-ONLY subtree — the text must land in commons and be pulled by both
siblings). Each point carries the verbatim spec anchor it changes, proposed
RFC 2119 wording, and what we MEASURED about compatibility rather than what we
assume.
Two things are stated as open rather than settled, because they are:
- A2 (cost baseline): the golden bundle has no cost-baseline.json, so an
unconditional requirement would change the fasit bytes for both stacks. Our
wording requires a baseline only for runs that can spend; if the amendment
chooses otherwise, the fasit change must be planned in both repos.
- A5 (rounding): the divergence is live — our monetary figures are unrounded,
MAF rounds one. The proposed rule lands on our current behaviour, which is
exactly why it cannot be decided here. Neither side patches unilaterally.
Code anchors re-verified against the working tree this session (the ledger fix
earlier today shifted valuereport line numbers), not copied from STATE.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MQu2xxwedckjU56byu1aUG
The "D7-status i dag" column was measured in Steg 0 on 2026-07-16 and never
updated. Twelve build sessions have landed since, so twelve rows still read
"MANGLER" for capabilities that now exist — a later session reading the column
as current would rebuild something already built.
The note names each landed row with its commit (verified against git, not
against STATE's claim), and points at git history + STATE.md as the ground
truth for what exists today. The MAF column and the gate statuses are NOT
stale and remain valid planning input; only the D7 column is pinned to its
measurement date.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MQu2xxwedckjU56byu1aUG
MAF supplied the commit hash we had queued as an open coord question. The row
recorded "hash IKKE oppgitt — spurt"; it now carries the span rather than the
single point so the row stays diffable, per their own suggestion.
Recorded honestly: the hash is verified by MAF against their git and is NOT
independently checkable from here — we do not read MAF src, and a convenient
hash does not lapse that constraint.
The rounding divergence (they round one krone amount, we round none) is now
stated as live-not-disagreement: neither side patches unilaterally before the
commons amendment lands.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MQu2xxwedckjU56byu1aUG
Coord-runde 2026-07-25, ingen kodeendring (gate urørt: 603 passed, ruff+mypy rene).
- brief §7: projeksjons-kontrakten over hovedboken som spec-gap, meldt uavhengig
fra BEGGE stacker. MAF-søskenets ordlyd bevart verbatim; våre tre skjønnsvalg
målt mot kode (runding av kronebeløp: ingen hos oss, én hos dem — reell
divergens på identiske inndata). Anbefalt inn i D-A-bolken.
- paritetsplan rad 24/25: STALE «Gjenstår i MAF» rettet etter at MAF eksplisitt
frigav vårt planverk. Rad 25 merket «hash ikke oppgitt — spurt» framfor antatt.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MQu2xxwedckjU56byu1aUG
The last ungated build session: the operator now drives the whole build from the
command line, and the documents claim exactly what the code does (§1).
run.py becomes the collecting entrance. Exactly one of --bundle (one project) or
--portfolio (N projects from a schema-validated reference config, with
--verdict-dir as the portfolio-level expert inbox) is required; both and neither
are refused. --goals loads a goal contract and checks it against --ledger's
realized sum BEFORE the first model call: the §8 caps bound spend, the goal bounds
achievement, so a hard target the book already meets stops the run at exit 4
without constructing a client. A soft target reached is a flag and the run
continues; an absent ledger is an empty book, so the goal is still evaluated,
never skipped. The one declared goal also drives --value-report's goal progress —
one contract, never two figures that can disagree.
The portfolio path persists nothing (K3 returns typed results; the outbox names
pairs by run_id, which a portfolio pass has none of). Rather than accept
--out/--outbox/--run-id/--value-report/--inbox/--live-dry-run there and silently
ignore them, the entrance refuses them and says why. run_portfolio is imported
lazily — portfolio.py imports this module, so a module-level import is circular.
Three seams, each detach-proven RED:
- unwire the goal check → the run proceeds and spends → red
- unwire the portfolio branch → the configured projects never run → red
- document a flag no CLI offers → the README honesty grep goes red
That last one is the doc-sync made load-bearing: the test reads README.md,
collects every --flag it documents (excluding third-party dev-tooling lines) and
asserts each exists in the --help of a CLI the README names. The drift it exists
to close was real — README claimed 562 tests, CHANGELOG claimed 265, actual 597.
Docs synced to the code: README gains an operator-CLI section and honest goal/
portfolio descriptions, CHANGELOG is rewritten to what actually shipped, and
docs/oppskrift-kunnskapsbase.md delivers D-H point 1 — the documented team
process for building a knowledge base, with the honest 1–2 week expectation and
every factory-dependent step (verdict translation, demo path) marked NOT BUILT.
597 passed · ruff clean · mypy strict clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MQu2xxwedckjU56byu1aUG
Pin dae0bd1a -> v0.3.1 (=692f2df) on the public Forgejo mirror; uv.lock pins
the exact commit behind the tag.
- Drop the mypy override: the library ships py.typed from v0.2.0, so strict
mode now follows its real types instead of follow_untyped_imports.
- Migrate 8 library-error assertions from pytest.raises(match=...) to
exc.value.code — message text is explicitly unstable from v0.3.0, the
codes are the stability contract.
- Fix a real breakage the bump surfaced: IngestResult gained a required
`stamp` field (d3a3bcc), which the delegation fake did not construct.
- The read-only SQL test loses resolution under the code contract
(`sql_failed` is generic), so it now proves read-onlyness by effect —
the write never lands — instead of by message wording.
- Correct the guard plan: G1's persist-gate anchor (ingest.py:372-387) died
with the 2026-07-16 adoption. Door A is ungated by the library's own
README, so gating stays our responsibility at the call site.
Verified: 426 tests green, golden output byte-exact unchanged, full gate
clean (ruff + format + mypy strict).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RmNAgbRXUgvoSKxVK4Bevv
Docs-only program-avslutning for ingest-laget (D7-stacken). Bygget fra
commons-spec + eget repo alene — MAF-koden kun eksistens-bekreftet (I6-gate),
aldri lest/reverse-engineert.
- README: ingest-seksjon (file/CSV + sql/sqlite RO) som post-S10-tillegg;
testtall 187 -> 265; HTTP/MCP kun peker (D7 har ingen HTTP-konnektor).
- docs/extending.md (ny): hvordan ingest-laget virker + hvordan legge til en
kildetype; HTTP/MCP som ærlig extension-point-peker (spec §4, MAF I6-demo,
create_sdk_mcp_server som ubygd vehikkel — brukt ingen steder i src/).
- docs/2026-07-04-I7-brief.md + -statusrapport.md: I7-brief + D7-lokal
statusrapport m/ verifiseringslogg. Kryss-stack-kriteriet peker til
MAF-programrapporten.
Ærlighetsregelen (method-spec §1): ingen artefakt påstår HTTP/MCP-støtte i D7
eller live-kilde-integrasjon. Grep-sjekk mot overpåstand ren.
Verifisering: 265 passed uten nøkkel/nettverk · ruff/mypy rene.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R7nuUMUyWB9viiBjz8Bo7R
Speiler MAF I2 fra shared/ingest-spec.md alene: manifest → CSV-konnektor →
materialisert OKF-bundle, byte-identisk med den delte golden-fasiten.
- ingest.py: ManifestContract (pydantic, fail-fast, file-kilde, verdict-reservasjon
§3, id-grammatikk, max_rows), CSV-konnektor (boundary-checked fail-closed),
materialisering (§5-frontmatter eksakt rekkefølge, markdown-tabell m/ escaping,
LF-only, SHA-256 manifest-stamp), index-generering (§6), replacement §3/§5.
- okf.py: _parse_index_entry — tolererer frontmatterløs index (method-spec §3:
index rendres via body = summary, ikke som typet concept-fil). Golden var
spec-konform; D7-okf var strengere enn standarden. Scoped: non-index concept-
filer krever fortsatt type (honesty-test).
- examples/ingest-golden-file/: repo-lokal golden (byte-frossen kopi av I2s fasit).
- Speiltester (I2s load-bearing-sett, alle detach-bevist røde): golden byte-fasit
+ mutasjonskontroller · provenance/navigability/verdict-reservasjon/re-ingest-safety
· kontrakt fail-fast/max_rows/boundary/kollisjon · spec-integritet §11.
- docs/2026-07-04-I3-brief.md: brief + de to operatør-avgjorte beslutningene.
Suite 239 passed uten nøkkel/nettverk (189 + 50 nye) · ruff + mypy --strict rene.
[skip-docs] README + docs/extending.md er bevisst utsatt til I7 per sesjonsplan
(programmet batcher ingest-doc der, avgrenset til det D7 faktisk har — CSV nå,
SQL/HTTP senere). Endringen er dokumentert i docs/2026-07-04-I3-brief.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017MM6BWb1hWmJZuXFZ7rjxT
