Persistent dev-fixture for energieffektivisering (energiledelse/M&V), valgt for
sin lærings-overflate: gapet mellom modellert besparelse (validatoren regner) og
faktisk realisert besparelse i drift (eksperten kjenner) — det ExpeL skal lære.
Ett kontorbygg, ett LED-retrofit-tiltak. OKF-bundle (index/project/hypothesis/
methodology/reference/verdict) bærer kontekst-laget; verdict-led-fro.md koder
realiseringsgraden (RR ≈ 0,82, forankret i National Grid SBS 2010) som ExpeL-frø.
Energi mappet inn i den EKSISTERENDE kost-IR-en uendret (affected = byggets totale
energikostnad, claimed = modellert besparelse ~10 % < 30 %-cap), så validatoren
kjører som-den-er — src/ urørt. golden.json fryser de seeded percentilene; testen
beviser at fixturen er konsumerbar (validerer, ikke Rejection), ikke bare til stede.
Domenetall verifisert mot primærkilder (EVO/IPMVP, DOE/NREL UMP, CPUC, fire
evalueringsstudier); norsk energipris mot SSB Q1 2026. README + shared/README
oppdatert (eksempel finnes, ikke lenger "planned"). Suite 121/4, ruff+mypy rene.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MHR8iKxJRxDiDfNw8HZmWE
Operatørens private Forgejo retter seg i praksis mot det norske markedet;
konseptnotatet er reader-facing for norske forretningslesere, så norsk gjør det
mer tilgjengelig. README (dev-facing shared-core-kontrakt) holdes engelsk inntil
videre.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019any9zfGNNwWJPX5Zq2QRz
First artifact in the framework-neutral shared core (R1 effectuated). CONCEPT.md
is a plain-language business description of the method for a non-specialist
audience; README.md documents the shared-core contract (consumed unchanged by
both the MAF impl and the future Claude Agents SDK sibling; extract to commons
repo via git subtree split when sibling work starts). English per the repo's
documentation-language convention + open-publish intent.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019any9zfGNNwWJPX5Zq2QRz
Nordstjerne fra design-samtale 2026-06-26. Konsoliderer: 8-stegs sverm-loop,
trelagsmodell (OKF-kontekst/output-inbox/promoteringsgate), to feedback-
tidsskalaer (kort synkron + lang fil-basert/gjenopptakbar), OKF/LLM-Wiki
datagrunnlag (web-verifisert mot Google knowledge-catalog), den samlende
diagnosen (tilbakemelding-inn-i-prompt-dataflyt mangler 3 steder), invarianter,
testbar "ferdig", delt eksempel for begge repo, fase-nedbrytning. 2 Mermaid-
diagrammer. STATE peker hit. R1 besluttet (shared/-dir nå). Domene lener mot
energieffektivisering (lærings-overflate > FinOps' for-deterministiske kjerne).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019any9zfGNNwWJPX5Zq2QRz
Fase 3 brief: sequential fan-out orchestrator over N portfolio projects,
reusing the single-project run_project seam. Four operator design decisions
locked via interview: isolate execution-state per project but SHARE one
VerdictStore (ExpeL accumulates across the portfolio); sequential (concurrency
= documented extension point); fixed config-list topology (resolves plan §12
open decision); list-of-RunResult + thin aggregate output. 0 research topics
(all internal; MAF concurrency already spiked in Fase 1 + de-scoped).
brief-reviewer (opus) → PROCEED on first iteration, all 6 dimensions pass
(completeness 5, consistency 4, testability 4, scope 5, research 5, memory 5).
Folded in its PROCEED-level refinements before finalize: per-project docs_dir
MUST be config-driven or SC1 breaks; SC7 given a concrete parametrised-test
assertion; SC5 baseline made relative (current+new, not a guessed 103); SC3
detach encodable as an automatic guard; SC4 fixture must yield overlapping
features; new synthetic project flagged AI-authored (user-not-domain-expert).
Validator: valid, 0 warnings. phase_signals: plan/execute/review = high/opus.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019any9zfGNNwWJPX5Zq2QRz
Remediation review of scope 6ef4efc..01c3f0d (high-effort, both reviewers).
Two independent reviewers (brief-conformance + code-correctness) each returned
zero findings after verifying the load-bearing detach criterion against the
actual code and the installed MAF source — explicitly refusing to treat the
green suite (103 passed / 3 skipped, offline) as evidence. All 7 actionable
original findings (2 BLOCKER + 5 MAJOR) confirmed RESOLVED:
F1 debate→generation (test_g), F2/F5/F8 BudgetMiddleware (test_h +
test_budget.py:70; conftest re-base verified necessary vs _clients.py:214-231),
F7 retrieval-tool exposure (spy tests). Coordinator verdict: ALLOW.
Standing items (not findings): F9 MINOR deferred, SC9 real-profile coverage,
retrieval-exposed-not-invoked, strict_usage fail-closed untested offline.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019any9zfGNNwWJPX5Zq2QRz
Independent post-hoc review (high-effort) of the Fase 2 vertical slice
(scope 9973d9f..308b553, 32 files). Two independent reviewers converged,
ground-truth-verified against source:
- F1 BLOCKER (run.py:124): maker-checker debate output discarded; the
validated proposal comes from a separate generate_via_llm call.
- F2 BLOCKER (budget.py:81): BudgetMiddleware defined+tested but never
wired onto the debate; the NFR short-circuit path is absent.
- F7/F3/F4/F8/F5 MAJOR, F9 MINOR.
The slice's three load-bearing seams are built + unit-tested but not
connected by the orchestrator; the green e2e suite asserts proposal
shape only. Fase 2 not closed — awaits operator decision.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Fif1r1En5W542HbZV88yMH
Fase 2 started. Brief for the MVP vertical slice (one synthetic project
end-to-end on MAF 1.9.0: debate -> blocking validator -> two-layer HITL +
provenance -> ExpeL learning) produced via /trekbrief from documented intent
(incremental-plan §Fase 2 + capability-map §1/§5 + Fase 1 findings), not live
Q&A per the project operating model. framing=preserve; phase_signals=high/opus.
Brief-reviewer gate passed 6/6 (all dimensions 5; verdict PROCEED_WITH_RISKS)
after 2 iterations: iter 1 flagged a no-op token-accounting criterion and a
false-positive on research-field order; 3 derivable refinements applied
(retargeted the UsageDetails assertion, added Open Questions for the concrete
local model + Foundry deployment names, added a topic-count note). Validator
green (0 errors/warnings).
3 research topics identified (gaps the capability-map did not resolve): native
HITL in MAF workflows, local_folder via MCPStdioTool + citation provenance, and
a real local-profile chat client (spikes used only FakeChatClient). Manual path:
stopped at the brief as a gated checkpoint; research must run before /trekplan.
.gitignore: ignore generated .html annotation + progress.json render-derivatives
under .claude/projects/ (the .md sources stay tracked).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Fif1r1En5W542HbZV88yMH
