Commit graph

91 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
f820081bdc
refactor(review): simplify pass over E (reuse, simplification, efficiency)
Quality only, no behaviour change (four cleanup reviewers, one implementer;
npm test 2480/0 on the working tree):

- threat-model.mjs splitBacked(): the one known_outside backing check of
  plan-gate (record and bare gate), verdict-gate and review-finalize, with
  one why-text; the engines' security keys derived from ENGINES; isSecurity.
- coordinator-contract: "not a security engine" read from ENGINES (a string
  engine only), not the code-review literal.
- review-rounds owns trailingBlock, findingsBlockSha, isMajor, isBlocker;
  review-answers imports them (review-rounds still imports nothing from it).
  prepare keeps the archive bytes it read instead of reading the previous
  archive again.
- engine-compare exports rowIn and payloadEngine; finalize uses them.
- plan-gate: one accepted_open builder; the stop-rule check hoisted; one
  top-level lookup for --record --brief.
- security-engine: notFullShas(), runCli's usage flag, readScopeList shared
  with engine-findings; findReport and reviewRoundSummary module-private;
  two dead defaults gone.
- tests: shared plan-gate harness and threat-model brief helpers; the [CNV]
  table cases call convertReport in-process, one CLI case per exit path.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-08 21:27:59 +01:00
f6e8529bdd
fix(review): convert refuses a partial or scoped Claude Security report; the stamp check is a trace (decisions 223, 224)
Two fail-closed checks in security-engine.mjs convert (decision 224), both
"not measured" (exit 2, the reason on stderr, nothing on stdout):
- the stamp's findings.total is not a non-negative integer, or the JSONL
  holds another number of records (a JSONL that lost the only BLOCKER line
  converted clean before; part 3 verifier, F3);
- the stamp's scope is not an empty list: a scan limited by --scope, an
  absent scope or a non-list scope (Claude Security 0.12.0 writes scope: []
  for an unscoped scan; F4).
The real Claude Security 0.12.0 probe report still converts: exit 0, one
BLOCKER, two below_threshold.

Decision 223, text only: the module header and SECURITY.md keep the
head/base check and say it is a trace, not a signature: code the reviewed
run executed can write a report folder of its own (convert reads the
matching one whose name sorts last) or delete the real one first (F2, a
known issue). /trekreview's not-measured list names the two new reasons.

The test helper writes the real stamp shape by default (findings.total =
the records in the JSONL written, scope: []). New tests for behaviour that
had none (F6): no fallback from an unverified newest match, a two-stamp
folder passed over, a symlinked stamp, JSONL or folder refused, a malformed
or absent scan_prefix, an unrecorded empty_diff or empty_scope.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-08 18:24:39 +01:00
3be2bd3386
fix(review): an engine finding raised again outside findings stays counted (decision 222)
A Claude Security finding counted at confidence high in round N that Claude
Security raises again at a lower confidence in round N+1 landed in that
payload's below_threshold, never in findings. Finalize passed only findings
to carry, the engine was in ran.engines, so the round-N finding was marked
resolved and the verdict fell from BLOCK to WARN (part 3 verifier, F1).

carry takes a new option, raised: the engine entries a round raised outside
findings. A previous engine finding that no current finding matches stays
carried, never resolved, when an entry of its own engine matches it (the
same file, then the same rule_key or content overlap); each entry holds at
most one previous finding. Without the option carry behaves as before.
Finalize's carry pass builds raised from every engine payload's
below_threshold and out_of_scope, the engine taken from the payload's
reviewer, never from the entry.

The carry rule is restated in the review-rounds and review-finalize headers,
/trekreview's round prose and Handover 6.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-08 18:22:49 +01:00
cb7c13b408
feat(review): the security engine chosen and Claude Security converted (E 3.1)
lib/review/security-engine.mjs (decisions 175, 196, 219):
- choose: Claude Security when available and base..head has committed
  changes; else /security-review when origin/HEAD resolves and
  origin/HEAD...HEAD is non-empty; else no engine (no-engine, no-origin,
  empty-diff), which is "not measured", never 0. A git failure or bad
  usage is exit 2, never a reason.
- convert: reads the newest CLAUDE-SECURITY-<ts>/ report whose stamp is a
  changes scan of exactly base..head; confidence high becomes engine
  findings through toReviewerPayload, the rest go to below_threshold and
  never into findings. An unverified scan, missing researcher counts,
  fewer researchers returned than dispatched, an empty diff or scope, or
  a malformed record is exit 2.
- NO_ENGINE_REVIEWER: with no engine chosen the expected reviewer
  security-engine never reports, so the verdict gate exits 2.

ENGINES gains claude-security (its own reviewer and brief_ref, the
engines' key) with a per-engine label for the written action; it is a
security engine in isSecurityFinding, RAN_ENGINES, the coordinator
contract (out-of-scope and brief-conflict rules) and the coordinator
prose; engine:below-threshold is an unverified reason fed like
engineOutOfScope. Pins of the changed coordinator prose follow.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-08 13:29:59 +01:00
1be961aab1
fix(gate): part 2 verifier findings — non-object findings, carried backed copy, rule_keys, marks, approval prose, brief_path, engine put-back once
1. plan-review-dedup skips only a null or undefined finding; any other
   entry that is not an object (a string, a number, an array) goes on as
   before E, a finding with no valid severity that the plan gate counts as
   a blocker (it was dropped, so a string blocker recorded PASS).
2. plan-gate --record: a previous finding that rule A carried as counted and
   whose id is backed this round leaves the counted set, the counts, the
   verdict and the stop rule's summary (it was counted and listed in
   known_outside at once: BLOCK, not-fewer, and --accept-open refused).
3. A known_outside entry keeps rule_keys; extractVerdict accepts it (a list
   of strings), and the bare gate re-checks with the same keys the recorder
   used, so a merged finding whose security key is only in rule_keys is a
   WARN, not a STOP.
4. plan-critic, scope-guardian and /trekplan Phase 9's round-2 sentences say
   the Critic Verdict also lists known_outside and each is marked by id in
   previous. Code already accepts such a mark (dedup passes it; countRound
   ignores ids it does not carry; --record removes the entry on true);
   pinned in diff mode and full count.
5. The approval prose names ## Threat Model where it named only ## Intent +
   ## Goal: skills/annotating/SKILL.md (description, step 4, guard list),
   docs/command-modes.md, Handover 1's intent_approved_hash row, README
   (approval, Approve row, intent approval gate) and CLAUDE.md's /trekbrief
   row.
6. threat-model.mjs gains usableInRepo (a brief path relative to the repo
   top level) and repoRelativeBrief; --record stores brief_path relative to
   the top level, never absolute, and both gates read it from there, so the
   gate run from a subdirectory reads the same brief. reviewThreatModel
   uses usableInRepo. Handover 4 and the gate header say so.
7. review-finalize's outside pass puts an entry back only when no finding
   carries its row yet (engine-compare rowOf): an engine finding listed in
   known_outside while its payload is saved went back twice.
8. A test runs scripts/release-check.mjs on a review whose known_outside
   entry the brief does not back: exit 2 (control: backed passes the review
   check).

Existing tests changed: plan-gate-threat-model's entry-keys assertion now
expects rule_keys (item 3), and its planted non-security entry drops the
security key from rule_keys too, since the gate reads rule_keys (item 3).

Part 2 fix round of the E plan.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-08 10:50:20 +01:00
c47061191c
feat(review): the brief's threat model on the review side (decision 164, 167, 218)
The code-correctness reviewer's dimension 6 shrinks to what the engines do
not read: command, skill and agent markdown carrying shell, with Claude
Code's threshold (a concrete attack path, high confidence), the keys
SECURITY_INJECTION or SECURITY_RISK, and threat_model_ref quoting the
brief's Outside: line; the code-level bullets go to the engines.

The coordinator puts a Voyage security finding with a threat_model_ref
into the trailing JSON block's known_outside, never into findings.
review-finalize gains the pass `outside`, right after engine: it only
raises. An entry the brief at the review's brief_path does not back now
(line gone, threat model not usable, an engine finding, not a security
finding) goes back into the findings at its catalogue tier with a Source
line, R-step and raised verdict, as the engine put-back does; the rest are
listed under the new `## Outside the Threat Model` section.

verdict-gate decideOpenFindings (and so scripts/release-check.mjs)
re-checks every entry against brief_path through the new
notBackedOutside and exits 2 for one not backed. review-validator
shape-checks the optional known_outside (REVIEW_KNOWN_OUTSIDE_MALFORMED).
threat-model.mjs gains reviewThreatModel and isKnownEntry for the three.

/trekreview Phase 8.8 lists the known issues outside the threat model
(not answered, not counted); the review template shows the section and
field; Handover 1 names the optional ## Threat Model and its code,
Handover 6 names known_outside and its code.

Part 2, step 2.5 of the E plan.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-08 09:14:47 +01:00
98171d7d3b
feat(gate): the brief's threat model on the plan side (decision 164, 218, 220)
plan-gate.mjs --record --brief <brief.md> (a known flag; its value is kept
out of the positional arguments, a missing value is a usage error) applies
the brief's threat model to the deduped findings before countRound when
threat-model.mjs usable() says it may: a backed finding (Voyage's own
security finding whose threat_model_ref equals an Outside: line's text)
leaves the counted set and the stop rule and goes to the new optional
verdict field known_outside ({id, rule_key, text, line}), carried to later
rounds until a reviewer marks it resolved or it is reported again under its
id. The verdict stores brief_path (carried when a later round has none).
The --record line adds known_outside (a count) and threat_model
({applied, why}): a threat model that is not usable backs nothing, every
security finding counts, and the output says why. extractVerdict
shape-checks both new fields.

The bare gate re-reads the brief at brief_path each run: an entry still
backed is a warning, PLAN_GATE_KNOWN_OUTSIDE; one no longer backed (line
gone, approval stale or not logged, brief unreadable, no brief_path, or not
a Voyage security finding) stops the plan, PLAN_GATE_OUTSIDE_NOT_BACKED: it
counts in full. gatePlan takes an optional threatModel for tests.

plan-review-dedup keeps threat_model_ref on a merge only when every merged
copy carries the same one; the S160 known issue is fixed: a null in a
reviewer's findings list is skipped instead of crashing the CLI.

plan-critic and scope-guardian: a security finding needs a concrete attack
path and high confidence (Claude Code's threshold, 167), uses
SECURITY_INJECTION or SECURITY_RISK, and quotes the Outside: line's text in
threat_model_ref when one applies; the json template carries the field.
/trekplan Phase 9 passes the brief path to plan-critic and --brief to
--record. Handover 4 names the two fields, the two codes and the flag.

Part 2, step 2.4 of the E plan.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-08 09:04:08 +01:00
5cb2918baa
feat(review): the critic's own security key SECURITY_RISK (decision 167)
lib/review/rule-catalogue.mjs gains SECURITY_RISK (BLOCKER, category
security, memory route rule): Voyage's own security key for a finding by
its own reviewers that SECURITY_INJECTION does not cover.
SECURITY_REVIEW_VULNERABILITY is described as the engines' key only.
plan-critic and scope-guardian name SECURITY_INJECTION or SECURITY_RISK
and no longer the engines' key.

The count moves from 17 to 18 in every pin: rule-catalogue.test,
claude-md-scope [CAT] (which now also refuses a stale 17), doc-consistency,
review-prose-pins, docs/architecture.md and the two reviewer agents.
critic-severity-rules pins three security keys; its "every security key
named" check leaves out the engines' key, and a new pin says the critic
never names it.

Existing tests changed for the planned rule: the four count pins above
(17 -> 18), and critic-severity-rules' two-key test (now three keys).
tests/lib/engine-findings.test.mjs: a comment naming the "(17 keys)" pin
now says 18.

Part 2, step 2.3 of the E plan.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-08 08:55:34 +01:00
bec4500b8f
feat(review): one reader of the brief's threat model (decision 164, 218)
New lib/review/threat-model.mjs, the one reader both gates use:
readThreatModel(briefText) -> {present, inside, outside, problems} through
brief-validator's parseThreatModel; usable(briefPath, repo) = present, well
formed, and the intent approval current by the two checks /trekplan Phase 1
runs (checkIntentApprovalContent, then verifyLog kind intent with the
hash's sha256: stripped and the subject normalized), else not usable with
the reason in `why`; backedLine(finding, tm) = the Outside: text the
finding's threat_model_ref equals exactly, else null. Only a security
finding not from an engine can be outside (218): a finding with an
`engine`, or carrying the engines' key SECURITY_REVIEW_VULNERABILITY, is
never backed.

Part 2, step 2.2 of the E plan.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-08 08:51:04 +01:00
07a3c06c57
fix(gate): part 1 verifier findings — stop-rule wording, guard tests, unreadable round
- plan-gate: the bare gate's stale-verdict reason no longer says "run the
  next round" once the stop rule fired; it says there is no next round, as
  acceptOpen already does.
- trekplan Phase 9: "REVISE after the last round" (Fix now with
  --extra-round) is qualified "and the stop rule did not fire", pinned in
  review-loop-docs.test.mjs next to the [STP] pins.
- plan-gate-stop-rule tests: a planted stop-rule acceptance claiming an open
  security blocker stays STOP; a planted acceptance without under:
  "stop-rule" stays STOP; the "a blocker -> refused" test now asserts the
  blocker refusal; --accept-open under the stop rule covers an open MAJOR
  and the gate passes with a WARN.
- review-rounds prepare: when the stop rule is judged (P >= 2) and either
  round's JSON block cannot be read, exit 2 (not measured) with "stop rule:
  a round has no readable JSON block" instead of skipping the rule. The
  [RND] differing-archive and [CAP] fixtures now use readable archives; one
  new [STP] test covers an unreadable archive and an unreadable review.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-08 07:39:00 +01:00
6b44be4c43
feat(review): stop rule in the review rounds (decision 217, 220)
prepare (also --dry-run) judges the previous round's archive and
review.md when it would open round 3: blocking = BLOCKER + counting MAJOR
with the verdict gate's pre-existing reading, new = no carried_from, class
= classOf. Fired -> exit 1, `review-stop-rule: <describeStop line>` and
`stop_rule`, nothing archived. The cap stays. A round with no readable
JSON block gives no summary and the rule is not judged.

countingMajors moves from review-answers.mjs into review-rounds.mjs and is
re-exported by review-answers (as isSecurityFinding is); review-rounds
still imports nothing from review-answers.

Existing test updated for the planned rule: the [CRY] occurrence case adds
a third round-1 MAJOR resolved in round 2, so its round-3 control is not
stopped by "not fewer".

Part 1, step 1.3 of the E plan.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-08 07:13:07 +01:00
7e09edb24f
feat(review): one shared stop rule for the plan loop and review rounds (decision 217)
New lib/review/stop-rule.mjs: classOf (catalogue key, else the lower-cased
dimension before the first slash, else unclassified), roundSummary
(blocking = blockers + counting majors; new = no carried_from; null map
for a round counted in full), decideStop (same-class / not-fewer on the
last pair, round 1 alone never fires) and describeStop (one operator line
with the class, the counts per round and the two recommendations).

Part 1, step 1.1 of the E plan.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-08 06:58:45 +01:00
2a35d067d9
chore(cleanup): R-b R3 — profiles, phase signals and the effort dialog removed, one fixed path per command
The four profiles, the resolver, the profile validator and docs/profiles.md go;
/trekbrief Phase 3.5 and the brief's phase_signals checks go (an older brief's
key is ignored); MANIFEST_PROFILE_DRIFT and profile_used go. Every Profile,
Composition rule, Sequencing gate and High-effort section leaves the commands.
Decision 209: /trekresearch runs the full swarm with contrarian-researcher as
wave 2 every run; /trekreview and the coordinator run all four passes with no
high-effort normalization. Voyage agents are spawned with no model (their own
model: opus applies); the two built-in spawns pass model "opus". --profile
stays in the parser as a retired flag that swallows its value. §Model & effort
moves to docs/architecture.md; the sequencing-gate eval case goes.

Files removed: 44 (43 from the R3 list + tests/commands/trekreview.test.mjs,
whose every test pinned removed text). Files edited: 43.
Tests: 2467 (2466 pass / 0 fail / 1 skipped) before, 2309 (2309 pass / 0 fail /
0 skipped) after. Durable check: all three groups green, none pending.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-07 21:12:57 +01:00
21480e8627
chore(cleanup): R-b R1 — Voyage's own stats, events and OTel export removed
Removes Voyage's measurement, statistics and export apparatus (decision 189;
condition 175 met in step 1) and the R-a leftovers: lib/stats/, lib/exporters/,
the otel-export and post-bash-stats hooks, yardstick, end-state and comparison
gates, synthesis-measure, gold-scorer, docs/observability.md,
examples/observability/, docs/T1-cc26-delegated-orchestration.md and their
tests and fixtures. The six command stats phases and the /trekexecute
main-merge event blocks go; intent-approval --stamp no longer emits
brief-approved. README and docs point to Claude Code's own OpenTelemetry.

Files removed: 52. Files edited: 37.
npm test: 2930 tests (2928 pass / 0 fail / 2 skipped) before, 2600 tests
(2598 pass / 0 fail / 2 skipped) after. removed-surfaces group R1 green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-07 20:11:00 +01:00
efe981f7bc
refactor(cleanup): simplify pass on the R-a diff
engine-compare imports the coordinator's title limit and trim instead
of a copy whose reason went with Arm B; the autonomy gate exports one
parser and its test runs in-process with two CLI runs; one import
scanner in lib-imports; the fenced-section walker shared from
tests/helpers/md-section.mjs instead of six copies; plan-gate hash
in-process; living-paths scans once; routing drops the orchestrator
filter whose files are gone; small leftovers removed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-07 13:31:30 +01:00
8295601965
chore(cleanup): remove the June trials, orchestrator docs, dormant agent, caller-less code and the fix-round chain
R4-R7 of the cleanup list (decision 188): the June trial docs and
fixtures, the three orchestrator reference docs, the dormant
synthesis-agent, code with no caller (project-discovery, bash-normalize,
fidelity-diff, test-census, the next-session prompt validator, arm B and
the --workflow flag) and the fix-round chain. Living docs repointed; the
reasons for in-session orchestration and the all-opus pin are now written
in docs/architecture.md and docs/profiles.md.

New tests/lib/living-paths.test.mjs: living tracked text names only
plugin paths that exist (seen red with 22 dead pointers before this
commit). docs/T1-cc26-delegated-orchestration.md and
lib/review/gold-scorer.mjs stay until R-b: the frozen end-state registry
names them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-07 12:51:54 +01:00
9edc998fac
refactor: simplify pass (trekexecute)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-04 11:29:46 +01:00
5b9cbeba28
fix(review): the evidence writer takes a verdict only for the branch head
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-04 10:27:19 +01:00
d4daa9d787
fix(review): the instruction set holds nested rules files and a link's own name
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-04 10:16:34 +01:00
d81bd39754
fix(review): an answer after a stopped prepare no longer locks the rounds
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-04 10:05:04 +01:00
fc252f8d56
fix(review): the verdict gate refuses duplicate finding ids
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-04 09:40:25 +01:00
f1f5ab5528
refactor: simplify pass (trekexecute)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-03 12:48:04 +01:00
3cb3958238
fix(review): a dropped engine finding keeps the gate not measured, round 1 included
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-03 11:57:30 +01:00
a09e6c96a1
fix(review): scope_sha_start is bound to the fork point from main
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-03 11:23:21 +01:00
57e7eba0a0
fix(review): R6 checks every parent of a commit after the review
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-03 11:07:08 +01:00
ec5b6483ec
feat(hooks): the merge question says how the run was tested and how it is undone 2026-11-02 21:23:24 +01:00
fcba232ccd
feat(review): the code-correctness reviewer checks the repo's tracked instruction files 2026-11-02 20:47:15 +01:00
349a4fc789
feat(review): the standard path puts back engine findings the coordinator dropped 2026-11-02 20:12:46 +01:00
8d399fddfb
feat(review): a REVIEW.md policy caps and skips MINOR findings only 2026-11-02 19:43:54 +01:00
9e7e8d1516
feat(trekexecute): every MAJOR answered before merge, fixed runs the fix loop 2026-11-02 18:44:42 +01:00
635003e8aa
feat(review): review rounds carry findings until resolved, one cap of three 2026-11-02 17:44:23 +01:00
1464605e35
feat(review): pre-existing findings marked from git and re-derived by the gate 2026-11-02 16:37:24 +01:00
ce7dbc27a9
feat(review): a WARN opens the lock only when every counting MAJOR is answered 2026-11-02 15:45:37 +01:00
ce64851a0d
fix(review): an append of review answers to the approval log keeps the review current 2026-11-02 15:01:58 +01:00
ed67526987
feat(review): two CLAUDE.md rule keys at MINOR, the catalogue counts 17 2026-11-02 13:53:24 +01:00
c75ae2d3f5
refactor: simplify pass (trekexecute)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-28 16:34:32 +01:00
1b9d5fd459
fix(review): a failed git check-ignore writes no pointer, whatever language git speaks
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-28 15:46:43 +01:00
52c382c198
refactor: simplify pass (trekexecute)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-26 20:39:40 +01:00
c7fdbf0d8b
fix(review): applying a lesson skips a symlinked CLAUDE.md and an ignored lessons file
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-26 17:27:33 +01:00
5ddbcd3de6
fix(verdict-gate): free text added inside the lessons block makes the review stale
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-26 14:11:41 +01:00
77544841d7
fix(verdict-gate): a failed git call is reported as not measured, not stale
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-26 14:00:42 +01:00
703c508433
fix(verdict-gate): read --repo=<dir> and refuse unknown options
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-26 13:44:11 +01:00
cf7af30b46
fix(verdict-gate): accept only a full 40- or 64-hex reviewed commit
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-26 13:13:22 +01:00
af90e82794
refactor: simplify pass (trekexecute)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-24 22:22:18 +02:00
8a2a989f79
fix(siblings): the texts found next to round 4.5a's fixes say what the code does
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-24 20:41:53 +02:00
a5fcb5e8b4
fix(review): group a triplet's findings title first, so arrival order never changes the rows
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-23 18:30:52 +02:00
7175783ce5
fix(review): a past-the-end line makes a finding unverified, never refuted, and the Declined to Judge copy-through is pinned
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-23 17:13:03 +02:00
6c0718c8d8
fix(review): the verdict gate refuses, with --repo, a review of another commit than the one being merged
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-23 10:48:29 +02:00
8677836060
fix: close the gaps the review of the trial-5 fixes found
- park-attempt-files: parks in the git dir (outside the work tree, so Sub-step C.2 never registers a parked file again), reads a path with a space, names a new file under a header it cannot read, parks a symlink, never overwrites a parked file, and exits 1 while a file the attempt made is still in the tree; the upward diff is saved in one form whatever the git config.

- brief-validator: BRIEF_SC_NOT_RUNNABLE only when a later backticked span is a command; a criterion that only names a flag or a path stays prose (Handover 1 says so now).

- review ids: counted over the final list (runContract), as fill-finding-ids counts review.md; trimmed_count matches rows by id; engine-findings and fidelity-diff use computeFindingIds; the --workflow dedup keeps one source's different findings apart, the decision-23 put-back stays one copy per triplet.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-18 20:11:08 +02:00
b47cabdf30
fix(review): one reviewer's two findings on one triplet keep a row each
Pass 1 merged two different /code-review findings on (bin/slug.mjs, 46, CODE_REVIEW_DEFECT) and the second lost its row and its action. A reviewer never duplicates itself: its second finding on a triplet under another title stays its own row, with the id over rule_key#2 (the form critic-diff already uses); fill-finding-ids counts the same way (voyage-lekerepo trial 5, finding 7).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-18 19:50:20 +02:00