Commit graph

167 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
837e92545d
feat(skills): writing-criteria, one source for runnable criteria (order 7c)
A brief success criterion and a plan's Verify, Regression, End-to-end and
Verification lines are each one command the criteria runner accepts, written
as the line's first backticked span; anything more is bash tests/<name>.sh,
and each must be able to go red (the runner reads the exit code only).

- skills/writing-criteria/SKILL.md (S1 form), with Runs:/Refused:/Never red:
  examples that a pin runs through the criteria runner
- brief-reviewer and plan-critic preload writing-criteria and
  reviewing-adversarially (S3 + S4); the copied runner rules leave them, the
  two templates and /trekplan, which names the skill where the plan is written
  and where its three reviewers start
- eval cases 3 fire / 2 quiet / 1 effect; tests/lib/skills-criteria-prose-pins
- review-630 @~1 pin follows the text into the skill; trekplan-stats line_ref
  re-measured

Baseline without the skill: 24 of 27 written checks refused by the runner,
and 0 of 3 reviewers saw that git status/git log can never go red. With it:
0 of 27 refused, 3 of 3 reviewers flagged both.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-17 07:39:04 +02:00
af5de3fcb8
fix(ui): English labels where Voyage shows Norwegian to every user
Operator decision 56 (2026-10-17): the product shows English.

- Annotation HTML: the intent buttons, sidebar badges and the copied
  prompt read Fix / Change / Question. The stored keys stay
  fiks / endre / spørsmål, so annotations saved earlier still load.
- /trekreview project-memory approval: "Add the line" / "Not now".
- README, CLAUDE.md, docs/architecture.md, package.json and plugin.json
  describe what the product shows; README's hollow-answer line and the
  "anslag" in the profile section are English; a Norwegian code comment
  in profile-validator.mjs translated.

The Norwegian hollow-answer list in approval-log.mjs and trekbrief.md
stays: it matches what a user types. Both new tests failed on the code
before the change. Suite 2606 (2604/0/2).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-17 01:00:34 +02:00
184fbe4633
docs(changelog): the narrow remediation of the A/B review, decisions 48 and 50, with door lines
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-16 16:54:59 +02:00
fc865ca07a
docs(plan): Phase 9, Handover 4 and CLAUDE.md name rule A, with door lines
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-16 01:34:51 +02:00
3abf3d7238
refactor: simplify pass (trekexecute)
Decision 41's rerun is scoped to below plan_version 1.8 in the executor and Handover 4 (as the helper and the exit-2 row already say), the decision-30 sentence names the one exception, and the Fixed and Known-issues slicers share one subsection helper.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-14 18:45:25 +02:00
829da487ec
fix(execute): below 1.8 a plan that names no test file gets the files the helper wrote
Operator decision 41 (14.10); review finding 7b3b59ed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-14 18:17:24 +02:00
f746f27788
docs(plan): Handover 4, the planner and the template follow decisions 29 to 31
Operator decisions 28 to 31 (13.10 and 14.10).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-14 12:43:01 +02:00
a70f082f6e
fix(execute): the helper and the executor give red proof no list
Operator decisions 30 and 31 (14.10); review findings 11ee78c5 and d01df508.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-14 12:32:29 +02:00
25856f2e9c
fix(review): the workflow review fails closed when its coordinator returns nothing
Review finding edf2ec56; every reviewer that did not run is named in allow_blocked_by.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-14 11:20:28 +02:00
5b94952be9
fix(docs): the trekbrief pass branch names no Brief Quality, and the stats rows span their blocks
Operator decision 21 (12.10).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 19:16:51 +02:00
5fa956b974
docs(plan): Handover 4, the planner and the template follow the 1.9 fixes
Operator decisions 20 and 22.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 19:10:37 +02:00
0142034979
fix(execute): one definition of the step's test files, read as decision 20 sets it
Review finding cf241526.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 19:00:09 +02:00
05f6b67be9
fix(review): the workflow review ranks by tier and puts back every engine finding
Operator decision 23 (13.10); review findings ab1b5d9f and bc7f4e23 (workflow side).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 14:32:59 +02:00
acd0e3dd47
fix(approval): approval commits carry the caller's Co-Authored-By trailer
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 20:17:22 +02:00
94de23ca3b
fix(trekbrief): the review stamp covers only text the reviewer saw
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 20:03:26 +02:00
e6755bd886
fix(trekplan): explorers and reviewers read only in the repo and get the brief
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 19:45:40 +02:00
11315d04eb
fix(review): the coordinator gets the brief's choices and writes the brief-conflict mark
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 18:28:54 +02:00
64e6771c8b
feat(plan): plan_version 1.9 is the current target, the file first on every line [skip-docs]
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 16:42:28 +02:00
8bf97cc834
fix(execute): every test file on the Test first line is read, locked and copied
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 14:42:12 +02:00
a10018f9d3
fix: round 8 of the release review of 6.3.0, for 6.3.1
Round 8 (0f400d3..29b4ac9, BLOCK: 1 BLOCKER, 12 MAJOR, 1 MINOR). Each fix
began with a test that failed on 29b4ac9 (13 tests, all red there); suite
2221 (2219/0/2).

- BLOCKER: a backticked check whose trailing comment holds a quote, $,
  backtick or backslash is refused, not dropped. The comment was never
  screened, while the executor hands the Verify span as written to red
  proof, the test lock and the done line inside --cmd "...", where a $(...)
  runs and a quote ends the argument. trekplan's text and the reviewer's
  NOT RUN table say so.
- A span that is only a comment is not-a-command, not a placeholder. The
  dropComment text says the allowlist still refuses a word with a # in it.
- The criteria runner, comparison-gate and end-state-gate use isMain: they
  did nothing and exited 0 under a symlinked path. The test now refuses any
  process.argv[1] comparison outside lib/util/is-main.mjs.
- Files: in a field with backticked paths, a plain word counts only before
  the entry's description (a dash, or a colon after the path); a name with
  no slash only first in its entry or after and/or/+/&. "mocks
  fs.readFileSync", "runs on Node.js 22.x" or "no change to package.json"
  no longer make a tests-only step look like it builds something.
  Lowercase makefile, rakefile and justfile are build files. Measured on the
  520 Files: fields in 48 plans of the marketplace and the test repo:
  3 fields read differently (two notes no longer read as files, one
  duplicate name dropped), tests-only changed in 0.
- The test lock compares --cmd without its trailing comment, and the test
  lock and the done line read a stop with stoppedBy, the one reading.
  red-proof drops its second reading, spawnError.
- release-check reads a relative --review in --repo or, when only that one
  exists, from the current directory as 6.3.0 did; two different files are
  exit 2, never guessed. The runbook says so.
- One trailing-json reader: a closing fence may be longer than three
  backticks, in the block reader and the verdict gate alike, and the review
  validator and the synthesis digest use it, so three backticks inside a
  JSON string no longer hide a BLOCKER from the remediation-step check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-11 10:43:56 +02:00
29b4ac91b3
fix: round 7 of the release review of 6.3.0, for 6.3.1
Round 7 (516dffa..45aa9e1, WARN: 12 MAJOR, 0 BLOCKER) and the fence defect
found while writing its review.md. Each fix began with a test that failed on
0f400d3 (v6.3.0); suite 2208 (2206/0/2), 14 tests more.

- Tests-only (operator 2026-10-11): the plan's Files: alone decides, and the
  text says so (red-proof, trekexecute Sub-step B, step-implementer,
  HANDOVER-CONTRACTS). red-proof no longer reads the step's diff, so a change
  already in the tree when the step began no longer counts against it, and a
  plan placed outside .claude/ reads the same. The round-6 test that had the
  diff overrule the plan is rewritten to the new rule.
- The Files: reader keeps a plain file beside a backticked path
  (", Dockerfile", "the CLI entry src/cli.mjs", "and Makefile"). Measured on
  the 520 Files: fields in 182 plans: no field reads differently.
- Red proof reports a command its timeout killed as killed after the timeout,
  not "could not start"; the release check tells a timeout from output past
  its buffer and from another signal. One reading of a stop
  (criteria-runner stoppedBy) for red proof, the criteria runner and the
  release check.
- A trailing `# comment` is dropped in a backticked check too, and in a
  command passed as written, so the words screened are the words run.
- The release check reads a relative --review in --repo.
- The 15-minute timeout is defined once (criteria-runner.mjs).
- The findings check reads each cited file once per validation.
- One isMain helper (lib/util/is-main.mjs) for every CLI: the 31 copies of
  the realpath guard and the 20 modules still on the file:// guard, which
  exited 0 having done nothing under a symlink or a path with a space.
- The Bash guard writes its no-one-to-ask refusal once, on a direct condition.
- The findings check ends a ```json block only at a fence on its own line, so
  three backticks inside a JSON string no longer end it (also in 6.2.0).
- Brief-conformance notes: a test for test-lock green on exit 127 (it
  passed at once; it fails when 127 is read as could-not-run); the prose now
  names the git revision `@~1` as the one leading-@ exception.

Not changed: the example plan's steps 1-2 keep their tests-only warning
(operator decision 2026-10-09; the r5 test records it). Brief note 4 (a
Regression: whose runner is not installed goes to the fix rounds) is a
routing question for the operator.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-11 09:11:57 +02:00
45aa9e107a
fix: round 6 of the release review of 6.3.0
Round 6 (v6.2.0..c3641ff, WARN: 11 MAJOR, 3 MINOR; 0 BLOCKER). The round-5
fixes hold (code-correctness-reviewer); three of the new MAJOR were side
effects of running checks with no shell. Each fixed behind a test that
failed first on c3641ff.

- git checks stay in the repo too: no path that climbs out with .., starts
  at / or reads <rev>:../x, and no --no-index (both reviewers).
- A trailing `# comment` on a shell-fence line is dropped: with no shell,
  its words made an honest check NOT RUN, among them the first check of the
  shipped example plan.
- A glob reaches `node --test` only on Node 21 and later, which expands it
  itself; on an older Node it is refused with that reason (engines >=18).
- With no shell, exit 126/127 is the test program's own: red proof reads it
  as a red (the control run still tells an environment fault apart), the
  done line and the test lock as a failure.
- A runner that could not start (not installed) is NOT RUN in the criteria
  runner and not-run (exit 2) in regression-check, as red-proof and
  done-line already said; never a red suite.
- Tests-only: a backticked `Makefile` alone in its entry is a path, and red
  proof confirms the plan's tests-only reading against the step's own diff
  (the altitude finding: the diff is a fact, the Files: prose is not).
- release-check stops a suite that never ends (15 minutes) and reads it as
  not measured (exit 2).
- The two lines this release added to pre-bash-executor.mjs are ASCII.
- MINOR: git and the other runners share one plain-word pattern.

Not in this round: MINOR f00a2eb8 (shared norm/ticked-path and isMain
helpers) and MINOR on plan-review-dedup's repeated tokenizing.

Suite 2194 (2192/0/2).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-11 01:07:47 +02:00
c3641ffa42
fix: round 5 of the release review of 6.3.0, the structural fix
Round 5 (v6.2.0..d37e538, WARN: 11 MAJOR, 2 MINOR). The patching did not
converge (the same two places every round), so the operator chose a
structural fix on 2026-10-11. Each change behind a test that failed first.

- A check runs with no shell. criteria-runner's runCommand starts the runner
  with the very words the screen checked (spawnSync(words[0], words.slice(1)),
  without NODE_TEST_CONTEXT); Phase 7 criteria, Regression: (its exec copy is
  gone, MINOR 0e98d5c7), proof of red, the done line and the test lock all
  run through it. No quote, glob, tilde or variable can rewrite a checked
  word any more. The screen stays and says why: a word that means something
  else in a shell (quote, backslash, $, brace, leading ~) is refused; a glob
  reaches only node --test, which expands its own patterns (sh read
  `tests/.?/` as `tests/../`); no path climbs out with .. or starts at /;
  a word starting with @ is refused (pytest reads @file as more arguments).
- The K6 plan-file sweep has v6.2.0's own Files: reader again (516dffa):
  backticked paths, and plain words only in a field without them. The
  shared reader from round 3 planned directories a description named and
  dropped paths v6.2.0 planned. fieldPaths stays for the tests-only check,
  with a path test on spans (`parse()`, `p.parse()` are no paths), plain
  descriptions ignored when the field has backticked paths, dotfiles,
  backslash paths and glued spans read.
- Skill frontmatter reads a value as YAML does: trailing space is nothing,
  and a comment ends a plain value, a flow list or a block indicator
  (`model: opus # pinned`). A comment that cuts a plain description, or is
  the whole value, is still a hazard.
- release-check reads the diff with --no-renames: a test moved into an
  allowed place after the review shows as removed.
- The example plan's step 2 heading no longer says "must FAIL initially";
  steps 1-2 keep the tests-only warning (operator 2026-10-09, 73262b6).

Open: MINOR c1fef1ad (one shared isMain helper) is not in this round.
Measured: 0 of 463 Files: fields with backticked paths (520 fields in 182
plans across the marketplace repos) carry another path-like word.

Suite 2185 (2183/0/2).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-11 00:38:42 +02:00
0e612c88ac
fix: round 3 of the release review of 6.3.0
Round 3 (v6.2.0..96cb977, BLOCK: 1 BLOCKER, 8 MAJOR, 2 MINOR), each fixed
behind a test that failed first.

- Every allowlisted runner, not only git, takes plain words and a short list
  of options that only read: an option that writes a file or loads code
  (--test-reporter-destination, --outputFile, --junitxml, --basetemp,
  --import, --config, -p, -o, -exec, a reporter path) is on no list; after
  `npm test --` only paths follow; `make test` takes no VAR=value. A built-in
  node test reporter (tap, spec, dot, junit, lcov) stays allowed.
- /trekexecute: a restore the guard refuses (destructive git, in the mode
  that shows no prompts) or the operator declines is never recorded as
  reverted: simplify = "revert-refused" and the run stops before review; a
  refused step revert is reported with its paths.
- stepTestsOnly: a fixture document under tests/ is a test file, "e.g." is
  not a path, ./ is dropped; the plan-file sweep reads Files: with the same
  reader (fieldPaths); the validator hands its parsed fields over.
- plan-validator --steps-from asks for Verify: on a 1.8 plan too.
- skill frontmatter: a value starting with # is a hazard; a quote after an
  escaped backslash closes the value. Routing reads kind tags with hasOwn.
- release-check reads scope_sha_end as written (an all-digit sha keeps its
  leading zero), and Voyage's own artifacts under .claude/projects/ and
  .claude/voyage/ committed after the review do not count as unreviewed.

Suite 2170 (2168/0/2).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-10 23:25:24 +02:00
ed87cc668d
fix: round 2 of the release review of 6.3.0
Round 2 (v6.2.0..0d044f6, BLOCK: 2 BLOCKER, 11 MAJOR, 1 MINOR), each fixed
behind a test that failed first.

- The git runner checks only words /bin/sh passes through unchanged (no
  quote, backslash, $, glob or brace) and refuses --output and its
  abbreviations: round 1's --output refusal was bypassed by quoting.
- fieldPaths: backticked paths are kept as written, parentheses and all; in
  plain text every path-like word counts, and a parenthesised note does not.
- plan-validator --steps-from reads the plan's ## Verification for an
  appended End-to-end step, and warns instead of failing under --soft.
- regression-check prints progress_status, the value progress.json takes;
  /trekexecute copies it.
- release-check: a plugin in a subdirectory is checked in its own directory,
  the suite is not run when a cheaper check already makes the answer exit 2,
  and a bad argument or a crash is exit 2.
- Skill routing looks a skill up among skills only, and builds the corpus
  vectors once.
- /trekexecute Phase 7.2 says plainly that remediation steps in the review
  template's own form stop with a re-plan; making them runnable is a later
  order (operator 2026-10-10).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-10 22:43:38 +02:00
bef9c5b3ac
fix: the findings of the release review of 6.3.0
The review of v6.2.0..f669b87 (BLOCK: 1 BLOCKER, 12 MAJOR, 1 MINOR), each
fixed behind a test that failed first, or, for the two missing tests, a test
shown to fail on a stub of the branch it covers.

- Review steps appended by /trekexecute Phase 7.2 are held to the step rules
  on any plan version: plan-validator --steps-from <N> (on a plan below 1.8 a
  template review step validated and was executed).
- The guard refuses where no one can be asked also when its rules will not
  load; the wave merge path names that refusal instead of MERGE_REFUSED.
  Tests for the classifier-error refusal and post-approval-log's own check.
- release-check: the version files may change only in their version after
  the review (JSON compared without it), README diff lines are read inside
  hunks only, an unreadable diff is exit 2, and npm test runs without
  NODE_TEST_CONTEXT.
- What counts as a step of only tests: a note in parentheses is not a path,
  and a data file under specs/ is not a test. End-to-end: rides on the last
  step that builds behaviour (validator hint, trekplan, template).
- A removed line is cited as <rev>:<path>:<line> (findings-schema hint,
  trekreview re-ask).
- skill-lint counts a trailing newline as no line; regression-check takes
  commandEnv from lib/util/command-env.mjs; CLAUDE.md names four mode-read
  exemptions.
- /security-review, older than v6.2.0: the criteria runner refuses git
  --output, which writes a file.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-10 22:12:12 +02:00
33b58f460a
fix: the fix round before 6.3.0 (order 10)
1. A step of only tests can never be proven red. One reading,
   stepTestsOnly (lib/parsers/plan-schema.mjs, test paths from the new
   lib/util/test-path.mjs): the plan validator warns PLAN_STEP_TESTS_ONLY,
   red-proof --plan/--step adds tests_only to a not-red-at-base, and
   /trekexecute and the step helper send such a step straight up to the
   plan instead of into fix rounds that cannot succeed. /trekplan, the plan
   template and plan-critic (dimension 8, still 12) say the test belongs in
   the step that builds the behaviour.
2. Timing tests under load: the hook helper's kill limit is 30 s and per
   call overridable; SC #14 passes on the fastest of up to three runs
   against the same 800 ms limit (tests/helpers/timing.mjs).
3. The example plan's On failure lines open with a K11 word.
4. /trekreview saves the reviewer's whole answer for the findings check and
   names FINDING_PROSE_LINE_OUT_OF_RANGE (error: re-ask; warning: report).
5. The criteria runner's commands run without NODE_TEST_CONTEXT
   (commandEnv, moved to lib/util/command-env.mjs).
6. The resolver returns effort only when the brief's phase signal sets one;
   the four commands said it always did.

Also: the K2 hook tests used fixed session ids in a per-user temp dir, so
two suites running at once took each other's approval records; the ids are
now unique per run.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-09 22:16:12 +02:00
3c18fdb5f7
merge: main (7a skills workshop, 9 rettepakke, 7b researching-sources, 8 release runbook) into wave2-kobling
Union lines resolved: CLAUDE.md command table keeps main's /trekresearch
and /trekplan rows and this branch's /trekexecute row. README's
architecture block now counts the three skills main ships (it said 2
after 7b added researching-sources).

Contracts run against the real ones on the merged tree: K10/K11 (plan
validator refuses a piped Regression:, warns on an unknown On failure:;
regression-check passes/fails/absent/unrunnable), S2 (skills/test-first
and skills/debugging exist, voyage:<name> form as 7a chose), K7 (real
review_version 1.1 WARN -> 0, a BLOCK copy -> 1, a 1.0 review with no
verdict -> 2). npm test: 2102 / 2100 pass / 0 fail / 2 skipped.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-09 21:25:18 +02:00
e226c33916
merge: main (7a skills workshop, 9 rettepakke) into wave2-skills-research
Conflict: CLAUDE.md command table. Kept both sides: this branch's
/trekresearch row (the external agents preload researching-sources) and
main's /trekplan row (open minors listed for the operator).

researching-sources adapted to contract S1, now that 7a's form check and
routing test run over it:
- SKILL.md takes the fixed headings (Overview, When to use, Process, Red
  flags, Enforced by, Credits); the five rules and the confidence scale move
  under Process unchanged; Red flags lists the thoughts the baseline runs
  showed; "text only" becomes "prose only" as the form check reads it.
- The description adds "official" documentation and "looking up online what
  an error message means or what causes it": the error-lookup case ranked
  #3 behind debugging. That prompt also said "our tests fail", which is
  debugging's job; it now asks only what the error means and where that is
  documented. No threshold changed.
- Eval cases carry the routing tags (skill-trigger / skill-no-trigger /
  skill-effect, skill=, owner= task-finder and trekplan, from=), 7a's
  Skill grader pattern, arm: both on the no-trigger graders, and the
  judge-model line on the effect case.
- The `## Skills` row in README and CLAUDE.md.
- tests/lib/skills-research-prose-pins.test.mjs drops its two form pins
  (skill-lint is the authority now): 14 -> 12.

npm test on the merged tree: 2055 = 2053 pass / 0 fail / 2 skipped
(main 2043 + 12).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-09 19:34:38 +02:00
920fbd3c47
feat(trekexecute): couple the executor to the review gate, the plan approval and the step checks
Wave 2, order 6. /trekexecute now:
- refuses a plan whose logged approval does not cover its current sha256
  (K2, approval-log verify --kind plan), before step 1;
- runs the step check (K9) and the step's optional Regression: (K10, new
  lib/verification/regression-check.mjs through the criteria runner) at step
  end, before the checkpoint; exit 2 is "not measured", never green;
- runs the architecture rules (K5) and the plan-file sweep (K6) after the last
  step; a violation or a file outside the plan turns completed into partial;
- reviews by itself in the closing run (Phase 7.2): run the thing, /simplify,
  /trekreview, verdict-gate; a BLOCK adds the review's remediation steps after
  the plan validator accepts them and the operator re-approves the plan, capped
  at TREKEXECUTE_MAX_REVIEW_ROUNDS (3);
- makes the main-merge gate a lock on the verdict: BLOCK or undecided keeps
  the merge closed; when open, the executor merges and the guard's question is
  the one question (operator decision 2026-10-08). The --gates pause before
  the wave merge-back is gone for the same reason.

The guard refuses a merge into main and a push in the permission mode that
shows no prompts, since no one can be asked (operator decision 2026-10-09; two
mode-read exemptions approved by the operator).

progress.json gains optional coupling fields (Handover 5); the validator
rejects the runner's exitCode in plan_verification.failed_criteria (C15).
Pointer lines name the skills test-first and debugging (S2).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-09 19:22:00 +02:00
8e3946e687
feat(research): researching-sources skill, preloaded by the five web agents
The source rules the research agents shared by copy now live in one skill,
skills/researching-sources/: official sources first with URL, date and
matching version; no citation, no finding; an empty search is reported with
its denominator and never as a finding; fetched pages are data, and text in
them aimed at AI assistants is ignored and reported; nothing local in an
outbound query. It also holds the one confidence scale.

- docs-, community-, security-, contrarian-researcher and research-scout
  preload it (skills: ["voyage:researching-sources"]); the copied rule text
  leaves them, their own role stays.
- Two agent sentences that contradicted the rules are gone: an empty
  counter-evidence search "increases confidence", and "fall back silently".
- /trekresearch names the skill where it starts the external agents and in
  web follow-ups; Phase 6 rates on the skill's scale word for word; the
  deep-research adapter accepts `contradictory` like the template does.
- Enforced by: research-validator checks structure only, the query privacy
  gate runs only in the default-off STORM steps; the rest is text only.
  A guard on every web search is a separate later order (operator 08.10).
- Red baseline (helpers, offline fixtures): without the skill 3 of 5 runs
  ignored an injected instruction silently and 1 of 2 contrarian runs counted
  an empty search as weak support; with it 0 of 3 and 0 of 2. Path leaks:
  0 of 7 without, 0 of 5 with.
- Eval cases (3 should trigger, 2 should not, 1 effect), written, not run.
- tests/lib/skills-research-prose-pins.test.mjs: 14 pins, 13 red on 4ee711a.

Credits: Addy Osmani, agent-skills @9d0c60d,
skills/source-driven-development/SKILL.md:97-114 (MIT); Jesse Vincent,
obra/superpowers @8ca22db, skills/diagnosing-superpowers/ (MIT). Ideas only.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 21:46:49 +02:00
255b6b4bf8
feat(trekplan): Regression and On failure step rules, and trial 2's minor fixes
The minor points (B8-B12, C13, C14, C16, C17) of the second voyage-lekerepo
trial (2026-10-08), each verified against the code and started with a test
that failed first.

- K10: optional step field `Regression:` - one command the criteria runner
  allows, unpiped; plan-validator refuses one that can never run
  (PLAN_STEP_REGRESSION_NOT_RUNNABLE). Any plan_version, no bump.
- K11: `On failure:` opens with revert | retry | skip | escalate, or the
  validator warns (PLAN_STEP_ON_FAILURE_UNKNOWN); onFailureAction in
  plan-schema.
- B8 (operator decision 2026-10-08): minors open after the last critic round
  are listed numbered in the Phase 10 summary; the ones the operator picks are
  fixed and get one more round (--extra-round when the 3 are spent).
- B11: plan-review dedup merges two reviewers' findings on the same file:line
  with the same content (trial pair: Jaccard 0.44, overlap 0.83); the Jaccard
  threshold for every other pair is unchanged.
- B12: /trekbrief Step 4c says the reviewer runs in the background and is
  waited for, not "foreground, blocking".
- C13: the Phase 4 size count includes .mjs, .cjs, .mts, .cts.
- C14: --evidence shows the first output line on PASS rows.
- C16: findings-schema checks path:line citations in finding prose (error) and
  in the prose around the block (warning) against the file.
- C17: git-historian gets the brief, never proposes changing a frozen file,
  and names the remote from `git remote -v`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 21:42:21 +02:00
b0d96a2d53
fix: close what an independent review found in the trial 2 fixes
- The pre-compact hook read only a checkpoint that started with `git commit`,
  so every plan in the new `git add … && git commit` form rebuilt nothing, and
  an empty match also skipped the session-state refresh. It now finds the
  commit anywhere in the span and always refreshes; first test for the hook.
- A sub-bullet that carries its own command stays a criterion (folding it
  left the command unrun); the shallowest bullet sets the base indent.
- Only a MINOR/SUGGESTION /code-review finding outside the range is released
  from forbidding ALLOW: a MAJOR one may be a break cited at an unchanged
  caller.
- `reuse` is an improvement category; the session-spec template stages too;
  a negated bash 3.2 constraint, an env prefix and `bash -c` are handled.
- Stale comment, Declined-to-Judge wording and rule-key counts brought in line.

Tests fail on 7c11c2a first (9 of 24).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 15:21:56 +02:00
7c11c2aa9f
fix: the second lekerepo trial's faults that made a result wrong or misleading
voyage-lekerepo trial 2 (2026-10-08), report section A; the operator decided
they are fixed before the next release:
- A1: a /code-review finding whose category is simplification, efficiency,
  style or readability enters as CODE_REVIEW_IMPROVEMENT (MINOR), not MAJOR.
- A2: recommended_action is the engine's own fix when transcribed, otherwise
  a test-first step; never the failure scenario dressed as a remedy.
- A3: a /code-review finding outside the exact range it was given is declined
  and listed, but no longer holds ALLOW back; /security-review's still does.
- A4: the manifest must_contain recipe uses grep -E -e ... -- so a pattern
  like --sep is not read as an option.
- A5: indented sub-points belong to their criterion (counted), and a
  criterion with sub-points and no command warns BRIEF_SC_SUBPOINTS.
- A6: a brief requiring bash 3.2 whose criterion runs plain bash warns
  BRIEF_SC_BASH_NOT_PINNED; /trekbrief proposes /bin/bash.
- A7: the plan template's and /trekplan's checkpoints stage the step's files.

Tests fail on 5f9faee first (tests/lib/trial2-fixes.test.mjs, 11 of 14).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 15:12:07 +02:00
8094b00861
fix: brief template teaches runnable criteria; commands call validators through the plugin root
The skills reading (2026-10-06) found two defects the operator decided to fix
once wave 1 was merged:
- the brief template's Success Criteria examples used a pipe and npx, which
  the criteria runner refuses (and the brief validator now warns on);
- trekcontinue and trekexecute called lib/ scripts relative to the working
  directory, which is the user's repo, not the plugin.

Tests fail on the old text first (tests/lib/reading-defects.test.mjs).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 08:52:52 +02:00
5f9faeed4a
fix: close the six defects an independent review found in the trial fixes
Independent read-only review of c56f852..2d29966 (2026-10-08), each defect
reproduced by the reviewer; each new test fails on that code.

- test-lock green ran ANY allowlisted command: `green --cmd "git status"`
  marked a red step green and the stop guard let it stop. The lock now
  stores the step's test command (`lock --cmd`); `green` runs only that
  one (a different --cmd, or a lock without one, exits 2). trekexecute D1
  calls `green` with no command, which also removes the quoting hazard.
- plan-gate --accept-open worked at round 1 and passed the gate; it now
  refuses while rounds are left.
- findings-schema --repo-root swallowed a following flag, or took a root
  that does not exist, and silently skipped the line check: exit 2.
- brief-review-stamp hashed only the body, so a changed `framing` or
  `research_topics` stayed "current"; it now covers the reviewed
  frontmatter too (only the post-review stamps are left out).
- red-proof red_kind read an assertion message naming SyntaxError as a
  load error; the signatures are now specific.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 07:17:45 +02:00
2d29966f51
fix(plan): an open MAJOR stops the plan; after the last round the operator decides
voyage-lekerepo trial (2026-10-06) point 6, operator decision 2026-10-08
(«samme skala, og du spør»): the critics rated a non-discriminating test
minor in round 3, there was no way to fix it after the last round, it was
built, and /trekreview called the same weakness MAJOR (MISSING_TEST).

- plan-critic, scope-guardian: rate on the review catalogue's tiers; a test
  that cannot fail on a wrong implementation is major, never minor.
- plan-gate: an open MAJOR stops (PLAN_GATE_OPEN_MAJOR: revise and run the
  next round; PLAN_GATE_OPEN_MAJOR_FINAL after the last round: ask the
  operator). --accept-open records "build as is" after their yes, bound to
  the round and the plan hash; never for a blocker.
- trekplan Phase 9: REVISE after the last round asks fix now (one extra
  round) or build as is, instead of carrying the majors silently.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 07:07:00 +02:00
1b5218e8f4
fix(plan): every exploration agent runs; the brief is reviewed again only when it changed
voyage-lekerepo trial (2026-10-06) point 14, operator decision 2026-10-08
(«alle agenter, ny briefsjekk bare ved endring»):

- trekplan: the "Adaptive" hard rule (a 10-file project does not need 7
  agents) contradicted Phase 5 ("All agents run for all codebase sizes");
  it is gone, in line with quality before cost.
- brief-review-stamp.mjs: /trekbrief stamps the brief body when its
  brief-reviewer gate passes; /trekplan Phase 4b skips its own review only
  while the stamp is current. Stale (edited) or absent (another producer,
  or a gate that did not pass) reviews as before. Additive optional
  frontmatter fields, documented in Handover 1.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 07:01:44 +02:00
393b8e5a0a
fix(guards): a step whose test is seen green may stop while it waits for its controller
voyage-lekerepo trial (2026-10-06) point 7, operator decision 2026-10-08
(«grønt merke på låsen»): the stop guard blocked Stop three times while the
executor waited for the controller, with the step's test already green.

- test-lock.mjs green --cmd "<Verify>" runs the step's test command (same
  allowlist + denylist as done-line) and records green_at only on exit 0;
  pending clears it; a new lock starts without it.
- stop-test-lock lets a green-marked lock stop; the write guard still
  refuses the locked test files.
- trekexecute: D1 marks green after a PASS; each fix round marks pending.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 06:59:14 +02:00
81dc5af680
fix: the trial's mechanical faults -- approval label, import path, stats, annotate path, red kind
voyage-lekerepo end-to-end trial (2026-10-06), report points 8, 10, 12, 15, 16:

- approval-log: «Approve (Recommended)» / «Godkjenn (anbefalt)» is the
  approval it labels; the suffix never turns a hollow answer into a yes.
- trekexecute Phase 8: the state-file block imports atomic-write through
  ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}; a relative import only ran with cwd = plugin root
  (the test runs the block from another directory).
- trekreview, trekresearch, trekcontinue: stats go through stats-append like
  the other commands, and a failed write is reported, never skipped
  silently (closes the open STATE finding for all three). The schema
  fixture's stale line refs for these and trekplan are re-measured.
- annotate prints an absolute path, so file://{$ANNOT_HTML} is a live link.
- red-proof: `red_kind` = load-error | test-failure on a proven red.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 06:53:15 +02:00
609eb35015
fix(review): the review keeps the findings that are right
voyage-lekerepo end-to-end trial (2026-10-06), report points 1, 5, 11:

- engine-findings: recommended_action is "Fix <file:line> so this no longer
  happens: <failure scenario>", not "Resolve: <title>" (8 of 8 engine
  findings were set aside as actionability:empty); the coordinator never
  sets an engine finding aside for Actionability.
- findings-schema --repo-root: a cited line past the end of an existing
  file is FINDING_LINE_OUT_OF_RANGE, so Phase 5's bounded re-ask fixes it
  before the coordinator sees it. The reviewers' instruction said "the
  actual line number from the diff"; it now says the file's own line,
  never the patch's.
- fill-finding-ids.mjs: the coordinator (no shell) writes @@ID_<n>@@ and
  trekreview Phase 7 computes them over (file, line, rule_key); an
  unresolved placeholder or a wrong 40-hex id fails. The 4-field id with
  `title` the docs named is gone; the code always used three.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 06:48:13 +02:00
c56f852ab6
fix(validate): a check that can never run is caught when the brief or plan is written
voyage-lekerepo end-to-end trial (2026-10-06), report points 2, 3, 4, 9:
11 of 13 brief criteria were NOT RUN at review with no warning in /trekbrief;
a plan `git grep` criterion passed validator, gate and three critic rounds,
then felled the run in Phase 7; the End-to-end field and Phase 7's text
search never met; a prose Verify left the test command undefined.

- criteria-runner: runnableCheck() screens a declared check without running
  it (same allowlist; an npm run script is not looked up at write time);
  /bin/bash tests/<script> allowed; the plan report carries end_to_end,
  verified when a passed criterion runs a step's End-to-end command (the
  older text form still counts).
- plan-validator 1.8: PLAN_VERIFICATION_NOT_RUNNABLE,
  PLAN_STEP_VERIFY_NOT_RUNNABLE, PLAN_END_TO_END_NOT_RUNNABLE,
  PLAN_END_TO_END_NOT_VERIFIED (the gate inherits them).
- brief-validator: BRIEF_SC_NOT_RUNNABLE warning; /trekbrief offers a
  tests/ script; brief-reviewer no longer proposes unrunnable commands.
- trekexecute: Phase 7 copies end_to_end from the runner; Verify's test
  command is its first backticked span.

Measured on the trial's own brief and plan: 11 warnings (the 11 NOT RUN),
and the plan stops on V5 git grep and the unlisted End-to-end command.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 06:42:33 +02:00
ca6ee8779a
merge: wave 1 order 1 (executor) into main
CLAUDE.md command table: each row from its owner (trekplan from order 3,
trekexecute from order 1, trekreview from order 5).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 20:42:47 +02:00
21c28df3bc
merge: wave 1 order 2 (intent) into main
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 20:37:12 +02:00
885d515c3b
merge: wave 1 order 3 (plan and design) into main
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 20:36:31 +02:00
44dcc779a9
fix(execute): the step loop survives an adversarial review
An independent review of abc3083 found 15 defects, the two worst verified
in scratch repos. Each fix started with a test that failed.

- Proof of red could be "proven" by the environment: a start point
  unpacked with git archive had no node_modules and no .git, so any test
  failed there. The start point is now a git clone --shared checked out at
  start_sha, gitignored top-level entries are linked in, and a control run
  (start point + the change) must pass, or the result is not-run.
- The Test first file was never committed (the template lists it apart
  from Files:) and leaked into the next step's diff. The step's scope is
  now Files: + test files, staged at the checkpoint.
- New files outside Files: were invisible to every check. Every untracked
  file is registered with --intent-to-add; a revert unregisters them.
- The floor guard paired renames (foo.test.js -> .bak read as clean) and
  missed skipIf and node's t.skip/t.todo; prose files no longer count as
  stubs.
- Phase 7.5 audited from the last step's start_sha; it now uses the run's
  session_start_sha.
- The done line is written after the checkpoint and checked with --commit.
- fix_rounds never passes 5; attempts are never reset; re-control keeps
  the spec/quality verdicts and earlier floor-guard rulings; the closed
  stop list maps every existing stop; failed vs stopped made consistent;
  the controller's effort is said, not assumed.

Tests: 1470 (1468 pass, 0 fail, 2 skipped).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 20:17:39 +02:00
f5ca220bc0
feat(plan): plan 1.8, the plan gate, the design part and the plan-side checks
Wave 1, order 3 (P3 plan mode as the start, P2 design as its own part, P9
plan side). Contracts K3-K6 for the later merges.

- plan_version 1.8 (1.7 plans stay valid): Test first on every step, one
  End-to-end ("run the thing") step, optional Interface in / Interface out /
  Review focus fields, a ceremony class in the header (absent =
  architectural), and for architectural plans a ## Design part: module map
  without cycles, architecture rules that name their enforcer and the step
  that proves them, a requirements check asked as keep / change.
- K3 lib/validators/plan-gate.mjs: the critic verdict is recorded INSIDE the
  plan (Claude Code's plan approval hands a hook only the plan file's text),
  bound to the hash taken before the reviewers read it; 0 go / 1 stop / 2
  could not run; at most 3 critic rounds, then stop and ask.
- K5 lib/verification/arch-rules.mjs: runs the target repo's own
  dependency-cruiser or import-linter (installs nothing; 2 = not measured,
  never green); --prove --rule shows pass -> fail on a planted violation of
  that rule -> pass. Verified against dependency-cruiser 18.5.0 and
  import-linter 2.15; madge 8.0.0 left out (missed a planted .mjs cycle).
- K6 lib/verification/plan-scope-sweep.mjs: changed files no step names.
- /trekplan Phases 8-10: design part, bounded critic loop, the gate before
  "execute", a plan-mode path through ExitPlanMode (not yet run end to end
  inside plan mode). plan-critic 10 -> 12 dimensions; scope-guardian checks
  the ceremony.
- Fixed on the way: plan-validator and plan-review-dedup used the
  file://argv[1] main guard (no-op under a symlink or a space); CRLF plans
  failed every manifest; the dedup dropped finding severity.

Borrowed, credited in place: obra/superpowers, Kiro (docs), addyosmani/
agent-skills, mattpocock/skills, GitHub Spec Kit, bashebr/ai-native-sdlc,
Boris Cherny's public threads.

Suite 1497 (1495 / 0 / 2), 86 new tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 20:10:57 +02:00
22e792ce19
fix(review): a review with a control that did not run stops a merge
Operator decision 2026-10-06. Before, a WARN that existed only because a
reviewer or engine never reported (e.g. /security-review without an origin
remote) mapped to verdict-gate exit 0, so a review nobody performed in full
was green. Now `missing-reviewer:` / `unattributable-payload` in the JSON
block's allow_blocked_by is exit 2 (could not decide, never green); a WARN
for a MAJOR or a set-aside finding still passes with its reasons. A 1.1
review must carry allow_blocked_by.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 20:06:29 +02:00
40f6ae1177
fix(review): close the gate's fail-open paths an independent review found
An adversarial read of d88245c reproduced 15 problems; all fixed here, each
with a test that fails on the old code.

- verdict-gate: a greener verdict must be backed by the LAST fence being a
  `json` block of the right shape, with no BLOCKER in the JSON (any case),
  in `## Findings (BLOCKER)`, or a differing finding-id list; two verdict
  lines and more than one file argument are exit 2. ({}, null, lowercase
  "blocker", a trailing ```jsonc and a later json fence all gave exit 0.)
- engine-findings: a transcribed "narrower" key can no longer lower an
  engine tier; absolute paths under --repo-root match the scope; "12" lines
  parse; an empty scope is an error; out-of-scope engine findings are
  unverified (`engine:out-of-scope`) and forbid ALLOW.
- recurrence: the catch-all engine keys and keys normalised from unknown
  ones are never proposed; the same unfixed finding in two iterations is not
  a recurrence; proposals are validated before they are offered; \r/U+2028
  and damaged markers are refused; writes go through a symlinked CLAUDE.md.
  Prose points --repo at the session directory, not the git toplevel.
- Workflow substrate: engines are counted from what arrived, and the
  verdict's floor is recomputed from the coordinator's findings; now tested
  by running the script with stubbed Workflow globals. Two literal NUL bytes
  written as \u0000 (git saw the file as binary).
- Trimming keeps Pass 1's "Also flagged by" provenance; `## Declined to
  Judge` and remediation steps are required from review_version 1.1 only
  (N-1); the zero-diff review now carries the JSON block the gate needs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 20:03:16 +02:00
abc3083c1e
feat(execute): one fresh helper per step, a controller on the diff, proof by command
/trekexecute no longer builds steps itself. Each plan step is built by one
fresh helper (new agent step-implementer: opus, effort high, no Agent tool)
and judged by one controller (a general helper on opus) that reads the
diff from a recorded start_sha and gives two verdicts, spec and quality.
Fix rounds go up, maximum 5: three fixes by a fresh helper, then back to
the plan, then to the operator. No cheaper-model ladder.

Proof is a command, never the model's word:
- lib/verification/red-proof.mjs: the step's test must fail at the start
  point and pass at the result (exit 0/1/2; 2 is never green). Reproduces
  the 02243c6 red-first measurement (6 of 55) through the shim fixture.
- lib/verification/test-integrity.mjs: the floor guard on the diff
  (removed asserts, skipped/deleted tests, muted checks, stubs, loosened
  thresholds). Over the last 150 commits: 149 clean, 1 real finding.
- lib/verification/done-line.mjs: DONE step N only when the test command
  exits 0.

Test first is required from plan_version 1.8. The test lock (K8) is used
through its CLI and reported as not-locked while it is missing. A run
stops only on a closed list of four classes; every other call goes into a
decision log with its cost if wrong. Without a passing run-the-thing
criterion the result is not verified end to end, never green.

Handover 5 gains optional per-step start_sha, report_path, red_proof,
test_lock, fix_rounds (0-5) and run-level decisions and end_to_end; old
progress files still validate and resume.

No isolation on the helper: measured, a worktree-isolated subagent
branches from the default branch (02f320f), not the executor's HEAD
(2c89a6b), so it would miss the earlier steps.

Borrowings credited in commands/trekexecute.md ## Credits (Superpowers,
ai-native-sdlc, Kiro, GitHub Spec Kit, agent-skills, Cherny).

Tests: 1411 -> 1457 (1455 pass, 0 fail, 2 skipped).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 19:58:18 +02:00