Commit graph

192 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
7869c4cbae
fix(execute): the park step parks intent-to-add and coloured-diff files from any directory and exits 2 on a git failure
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-23 21:00:24 +02:00
761f406faa
fix(review): changed code and instruction files get deep review by default, summary-only is for docs
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-23 15:37:39 +02:00
b16e39ccd9
fix(research): the contrarian runs as a second wave with the leading answer to attack
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-23 15:23:18 +02:00
f32baf50ad
fix(continue): run the arg-parser, find the master prompt at the repo root, and let the consistency check read the state file
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-23 15:05:19 +02:00
403afe606f
fix(endsession): parse arguments with the arg-parser so a slug with -h is no help request, and only the operator starts it
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-23 14:45:25 +02:00
6226372eaa
fix(execute): the final report says whether the app was seen with Claude Code's run
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-23 14:26:28 +02:00
050a77f513
fix(execute): the merge lock refuses a review of an older commit (review-stale)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-23 11:06:14 +02:00
a9f5f6251a
fix(execute): the completion gate says which checks are commands and which are executor judgement
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-22 16:25:23 +02:00
2fe6feb74d
fix(execute): run the brief check in Phase 1, and say what effort really changes
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-22 16:07:27 +02:00
2b5d5f72bc
fix(execute): name and read --profile and --gates in the hint, the usage block and Phase 1
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-22 15:50:13 +02:00
af36578f12
fix(gates): one --gates rule in every command, run through the shim, and no executor pause the executor lacks
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-22 15:38:20 +02:00
8f9b0abfad
fix(brief): a brief with no research topics prints its next steps instead of entering the auto-only phase
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-22 15:12:59 +02:00
95eaa8dc57
fix(stats): no command promises a stats key its record does not write
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-22 15:04:29 +02:00
074feef475
fix(plan): every planning and research spawn takes the resolved model, and no turn budget is promised
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-22 14:51:04 +02:00
eafe023c74
fix(plan): execute hands the plan to /trekexecute instead of building it in the planning session
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-22 14:34:57 +02:00
be83e6e066
fix(docs): name /trekplan where the text sent readers to a reference document, and give the reference documents read-only tools
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-22 14:23:05 +02:00
45eaedc6b4
merge: main (wave 4 order A) into order B before B goes into main
Conflicts on the union lines only: CHANGELOG Unreleased (both orders'
entries kept), CLAUDE.md (/trekexecute row from A, /trekreview row from
B), tests/fixtures/jsonl-schemas.md (trekplan line_ref from B,
trekexecute line_ref from A). Suite on the merged tree 2682 (2680/0/2).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-19 18:49:02 +02:00
843897ae33
feat(skills): voyage:annotating, the operator-annotation loop as one skill (order B)
The three producing commands name voyage:annotating where they build the page; the description of the page and the freehand revision left them. The skill: the person writes every note, Fix/Change edit only the quoted text, a Question is answered and changes nothing, the approval an edit costs is said before the edit, the page is rebuilt. Research documents on request (decision 62). Red baseline 3 runs per scenario without and with the skill; six eval cases; 11 pins.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-19 18:36:00 +02:00
1989656a9c
feat(run): the run step names Claude Code's run; owner=run is a built-in owner (A2)
The coupling to Claude Code's built-in run skill (wave 4, order A2,
decisions 54 and 64). The plan's "run the thing" step, the executor's
End to end part and the plan template each say in one sentence that the
app is seen and driven with run, and that the verdict is still the
End-to-end: command, because run gives no exit code. The template quotes
the name instead of backticking it: every backticked span on a template
step bullet is read as a runnable example.

R2: lib/skills/routing.mjs keeps a short fixed list of Claude Code's own
skills a quiet case may name as owner (BUILTIN_OWNERS, only run, seen in
2.1.303). For such an owner only "not taken" is checked, and the report
says so; ROUTING_NEGATIVE_WON stands, and an owner on no list is still
ROUTING_UNKNOWN_OWNER. skill-writing-criteria-quiet-2 gets owner=run.

The trekplan.md paragraph is reflowed to its old line count so the stats
line_ref there does not move (order B edits the same file); the
trekexecute Phase 9 line_ref fixture moves by two lines.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-19 18:26:10 +02:00
8677836060
fix: close the gaps the review of the trial-5 fixes found
- park-attempt-files: parks in the git dir (outside the work tree, so Sub-step C.2 never registers a parked file again), reads a path with a space, names a new file under a header it cannot read, parks a symlink, never overwrites a parked file, and exits 1 while a file the attempt made is still in the tree; the upward diff is saved in one form whatever the git config.

- brief-validator: BRIEF_SC_NOT_RUNNABLE only when a later backticked span is a command; a criterion that only names a flag or a path stays prose (Handover 1 says so now).

- review ids: counted over the final list (runContract), as fill-finding-ids counts review.md; trimmed_count matches rows by id; engine-findings and fidelity-diff use computeFindingIds; the --workflow dedup keeps one source's different findings apart, the decision-23 put-back stays one copy per triplet.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-18 20:11:08 +02:00
3238327483
fix(trekexecute): park a re-planned step's earlier new files before the fresh build
The revert of a step sent back to the plan leaves its new files on disk, and --resume built the revised step on top of them: a stale tests/batch.sh holding the rejected line would have passed Verify, the manifest and the success criterion. lib/util/park-attempt-files.mjs moves every still-untracked file the attempt created (from step-N-upward.diff) into the report dir, never deleting it; /trekexecute runs it before the fresh build helper (voyage-lekerepo trial 5, finding 4).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-18 19:54:54 +02:00
0db3fe4be3
merge: main (7d, 7c) into 7e
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-17 18:20:08 +02:00
692f528a5c
merge: main (7d) into 7c
Union of the two new Skills rows in CLAUDE.md and README.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-17 17:39:19 +02:00
f6e18a1d09
feat(skills): interviewing - one source for the brief's question round (order 7e)
/trekbrief Phase 3 carried the interview form inline. It now asks for the
new skill voyage:interviewing by name (allowed-tools gains Skill) and keeps
only its own contract: the size class and budget, the three fixed questions
(framing first, class, storage), where each answer lands in the brief, and
the answers that decide nothing. Step 3a and the form points of Step 3c move
into the skill with their credits (Pocock, Osmani, Spec Kit; licences and
line ranges checked at the pinned commits).

Red baseline first (3 helper interviews against a fixed answer sheet,
Opus 5.5): 10-11 questions in round 1 (3 of 3), 15 of 31 without a
recommendation, a hollow answer written in as a decision (2 of 3), unasked
scope as a requirement (2 of 3). With the skill: 4, 0 of 12, 0 of 3, 0 of 3.
Fact questions and stopping did not fail without it.

Also: pointers to voyage:writing-criteria (S3) where criteria are asked and
written, both review skill names (S3 + S4) in the brief-reviewer prompt; the
intent pins that read moved text now read the skill, same assertions; the
Phase 7 line_ref moves with the shorter Phase 3; 7 eval cases (3/2/2).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-17 07:44:42 +02:00
837e92545d
feat(skills): writing-criteria, one source for runnable criteria (order 7c)
A brief success criterion and a plan's Verify, Regression, End-to-end and
Verification lines are each one command the criteria runner accepts, written
as the line's first backticked span; anything more is bash tests/<name>.sh,
and each must be able to go red (the runner reads the exit code only).

- skills/writing-criteria/SKILL.md (S1 form), with Runs:/Refused:/Never red:
  examples that a pin runs through the criteria runner
- brief-reviewer and plan-critic preload writing-criteria and
  reviewing-adversarially (S3 + S4); the copied runner rules leave them, the
  two templates and /trekplan, which names the skill where the plan is written
  and where its three reviewers start
- eval cases 3 fire / 2 quiet / 1 effect; tests/lib/skills-criteria-prose-pins
- review-630 @~1 pin follows the text into the skill; trekplan-stats line_ref
  re-measured

Baseline without the skill: 24 of 27 written checks refused by the runner,
and 0 of 3 reviewers saw that git status/git log can never go red. With it:
0 of 27 refused, 3 of 3 reviewers flagged both.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-17 07:39:04 +02:00
f906ec9252
feat(skills): reviewing-adversarially, one stance for every reviewer
A new skill, voyage:reviewing-adversarially (contract S4): no praise, no
finding without a source (file:line or a quoted line), no downgrade without
a reason, summary-only said and not judged, a Declined to Judge list, claims
checked against the diff rather than the report, axes kept separate.

Red baseline first: six review runs by helpers without the skill (two
invented fixtures) had no separate Declined to Judge list in 6 of 6, an
unsourced finding in 6 of 6, praise in 2 of 6 and a verdict on something
unmeasured in 4 of 6. With the skill: 6 of 6, 0, 0 and 0.

- brief-conformance-reviewer, code-correctness-reviewer, review-coordinator
  and scope-guardian preload it through skills:; the 21-line "Interaction
  Awareness - MANDATORY OVERRIDE" block copied into three of them is gone.
  Each agent keeps its own role.
- The two reviewers and scope-guardian end with their own Declined to Judge
  list; /trekreview names the skill at spawn and passes the reviewers'
  lines to the coordinator, which copies them into review.md as prose
  (the JSON declined_to_judge array and the verdict are unchanged).
- Eval cases 3 / 2 / 1; pins in tests/lib/skills-review-prose-pins.test.mjs.
- tests/fixtures/jsonl-schemas.md: the trekreview-stats line_ref moves with
  Phase 8 (636-686).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-17 07:34:08 +02:00
af5de3fcb8
fix(ui): English labels where Voyage shows Norwegian to every user
Operator decision 56 (2026-10-17): the product shows English.

- Annotation HTML: the intent buttons, sidebar badges and the copied
  prompt read Fix / Change / Question. The stored keys stay
  fiks / endre / spørsmål, so annotations saved earlier still load.
- /trekreview project-memory approval: "Add the line" / "Not now".
- README, CLAUDE.md, docs/architecture.md, package.json and plugin.json
  describe what the product shows; README's hollow-answer line and the
  "anslag" in the profile section are English; a Norwegian code comment
  in profile-validator.mjs translated.

The Norwegian hollow-answer list in approval-log.mjs and trekbrief.md
stays: it matches what a user types. Both new tests failed on the code
before the change. Suite 2606 (2604/0/2).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-17 01:00:34 +02:00
184fbe4633
docs(changelog): the narrow remediation of the A/B review, decisions 48 and 50, with door lines
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-16 16:54:59 +02:00
fc865ca07a
docs(plan): Phase 9, Handover 4 and CLAUDE.md name rule A, with door lines
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-16 01:34:51 +02:00
3abf3d7238
refactor: simplify pass (trekexecute)
Decision 41's rerun is scoped to below plan_version 1.8 in the executor and Handover 4 (as the helper and the exit-2 row already say), the decision-30 sentence names the one exception, and the Fixed and Known-issues slicers share one subsection helper.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-14 18:45:25 +02:00
829da487ec
fix(execute): below 1.8 a plan that names no test file gets the files the helper wrote
Operator decision 41 (14.10); review finding 7b3b59ed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-14 18:17:24 +02:00
f746f27788
docs(plan): Handover 4, the planner and the template follow decisions 29 to 31
Operator decisions 28 to 31 (13.10 and 14.10).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-14 12:43:01 +02:00
a70f082f6e
fix(execute): the helper and the executor give red proof no list
Operator decisions 30 and 31 (14.10); review findings 11ee78c5 and d01df508.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-14 12:32:29 +02:00
25856f2e9c
fix(review): the workflow review fails closed when its coordinator returns nothing
Review finding edf2ec56; every reviewer that did not run is named in allow_blocked_by.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-14 11:20:28 +02:00
5b94952be9
fix(docs): the trekbrief pass branch names no Brief Quality, and the stats rows span their blocks
Operator decision 21 (12.10).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 19:16:51 +02:00
5fa956b974
docs(plan): Handover 4, the planner and the template follow the 1.9 fixes
Operator decisions 20 and 22.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 19:10:37 +02:00
0142034979
fix(execute): one definition of the step's test files, read as decision 20 sets it
Review finding cf241526.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 19:00:09 +02:00
05f6b67be9
fix(review): the workflow review ranks by tier and puts back every engine finding
Operator decision 23 (13.10); review findings ab1b5d9f and bc7f4e23 (workflow side).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 14:32:59 +02:00
acd0e3dd47
fix(approval): approval commits carry the caller's Co-Authored-By trailer
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 20:17:22 +02:00
94de23ca3b
fix(trekbrief): the review stamp covers only text the reviewer saw
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 20:03:26 +02:00
e6755bd886
fix(trekplan): explorers and reviewers read only in the repo and get the brief
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 19:45:40 +02:00
11315d04eb
fix(review): the coordinator gets the brief's choices and writes the brief-conflict mark
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 18:28:54 +02:00
64e6771c8b
feat(plan): plan_version 1.9 is the current target, the file first on every line [skip-docs]
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 16:42:28 +02:00
8bf97cc834
fix(execute): every test file on the Test first line is read, locked and copied
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 14:42:12 +02:00
a10018f9d3
fix: round 8 of the release review of 6.3.0, for 6.3.1
Round 8 (0f400d3..29b4ac9, BLOCK: 1 BLOCKER, 12 MAJOR, 1 MINOR). Each fix
began with a test that failed on 29b4ac9 (13 tests, all red there); suite
2221 (2219/0/2).

- BLOCKER: a backticked check whose trailing comment holds a quote, $,
  backtick or backslash is refused, not dropped. The comment was never
  screened, while the executor hands the Verify span as written to red
  proof, the test lock and the done line inside --cmd "...", where a $(...)
  runs and a quote ends the argument. trekplan's text and the reviewer's
  NOT RUN table say so.
- A span that is only a comment is not-a-command, not a placeholder. The
  dropComment text says the allowlist still refuses a word with a # in it.
- The criteria runner, comparison-gate and end-state-gate use isMain: they
  did nothing and exited 0 under a symlinked path. The test now refuses any
  process.argv[1] comparison outside lib/util/is-main.mjs.
- Files: in a field with backticked paths, a plain word counts only before
  the entry's description (a dash, or a colon after the path); a name with
  no slash only first in its entry or after and/or/+/&. "mocks
  fs.readFileSync", "runs on Node.js 22.x" or "no change to package.json"
  no longer make a tests-only step look like it builds something.
  Lowercase makefile, rakefile and justfile are build files. Measured on the
  520 Files: fields in 48 plans of the marketplace and the test repo:
  3 fields read differently (two notes no longer read as files, one
  duplicate name dropped), tests-only changed in 0.
- The test lock compares --cmd without its trailing comment, and the test
  lock and the done line read a stop with stoppedBy, the one reading.
  red-proof drops its second reading, spawnError.
- release-check reads a relative --review in --repo or, when only that one
  exists, from the current directory as 6.3.0 did; two different files are
  exit 2, never guessed. The runbook says so.
- One trailing-json reader: a closing fence may be longer than three
  backticks, in the block reader and the verdict gate alike, and the review
  validator and the synthesis digest use it, so three backticks inside a
  JSON string no longer hide a BLOCKER from the remediation-step check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-11 10:43:56 +02:00
29b4ac91b3
fix: round 7 of the release review of 6.3.0, for 6.3.1
Round 7 (516dffa..45aa9e1, WARN: 12 MAJOR, 0 BLOCKER) and the fence defect
found while writing its review.md. Each fix began with a test that failed on
0f400d3 (v6.3.0); suite 2208 (2206/0/2), 14 tests more.

- Tests-only (operator 2026-10-11): the plan's Files: alone decides, and the
  text says so (red-proof, trekexecute Sub-step B, step-implementer,
  HANDOVER-CONTRACTS). red-proof no longer reads the step's diff, so a change
  already in the tree when the step began no longer counts against it, and a
  plan placed outside .claude/ reads the same. The round-6 test that had the
  diff overrule the plan is rewritten to the new rule.
- The Files: reader keeps a plain file beside a backticked path
  (", Dockerfile", "the CLI entry src/cli.mjs", "and Makefile"). Measured on
  the 520 Files: fields in 182 plans: no field reads differently.
- Red proof reports a command its timeout killed as killed after the timeout,
  not "could not start"; the release check tells a timeout from output past
  its buffer and from another signal. One reading of a stop
  (criteria-runner stoppedBy) for red proof, the criteria runner and the
  release check.
- A trailing `# comment` is dropped in a backticked check too, and in a
  command passed as written, so the words screened are the words run.
- The release check reads a relative --review in --repo.
- The 15-minute timeout is defined once (criteria-runner.mjs).
- The findings check reads each cited file once per validation.
- One isMain helper (lib/util/is-main.mjs) for every CLI: the 31 copies of
  the realpath guard and the 20 modules still on the file:// guard, which
  exited 0 having done nothing under a symlink or a path with a space.
- The Bash guard writes its no-one-to-ask refusal once, on a direct condition.
- The findings check ends a ```json block only at a fence on its own line, so
  three backticks inside a JSON string no longer end it (also in 6.2.0).
- Brief-conformance notes: a test for test-lock green on exit 127 (it
  passed at once; it fails when 127 is read as could-not-run); the prose now
  names the git revision `@~1` as the one leading-@ exception.

Not changed: the example plan's steps 1-2 keep their tests-only warning
(operator decision 2026-10-09; the r5 test records it). Brief note 4 (a
Regression: whose runner is not installed goes to the fix rounds) is a
routing question for the operator.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-11 09:11:57 +02:00
45aa9e107a
fix: round 6 of the release review of 6.3.0
Round 6 (v6.2.0..c3641ff, WARN: 11 MAJOR, 3 MINOR; 0 BLOCKER). The round-5
fixes hold (code-correctness-reviewer); three of the new MAJOR were side
effects of running checks with no shell. Each fixed behind a test that
failed first on c3641ff.

- git checks stay in the repo too: no path that climbs out with .., starts
  at / or reads <rev>:../x, and no --no-index (both reviewers).
- A trailing `# comment` on a shell-fence line is dropped: with no shell,
  its words made an honest check NOT RUN, among them the first check of the
  shipped example plan.
- A glob reaches `node --test` only on Node 21 and later, which expands it
  itself; on an older Node it is refused with that reason (engines >=18).
- With no shell, exit 126/127 is the test program's own: red proof reads it
  as a red (the control run still tells an environment fault apart), the
  done line and the test lock as a failure.
- A runner that could not start (not installed) is NOT RUN in the criteria
  runner and not-run (exit 2) in regression-check, as red-proof and
  done-line already said; never a red suite.
- Tests-only: a backticked `Makefile` alone in its entry is a path, and red
  proof confirms the plan's tests-only reading against the step's own diff
  (the altitude finding: the diff is a fact, the Files: prose is not).
- release-check stops a suite that never ends (15 minutes) and reads it as
  not measured (exit 2).
- The two lines this release added to pre-bash-executor.mjs are ASCII.
- MINOR: git and the other runners share one plain-word pattern.

Not in this round: MINOR f00a2eb8 (shared norm/ticked-path and isMain
helpers) and MINOR on plan-review-dedup's repeated tokenizing.

Suite 2194 (2192/0/2).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-11 01:07:47 +02:00
c3641ffa42
fix: round 5 of the release review of 6.3.0, the structural fix
Round 5 (v6.2.0..d37e538, WARN: 11 MAJOR, 2 MINOR). The patching did not
converge (the same two places every round), so the operator chose a
structural fix on 2026-10-11. Each change behind a test that failed first.

- A check runs with no shell. criteria-runner's runCommand starts the runner
  with the very words the screen checked (spawnSync(words[0], words.slice(1)),
  without NODE_TEST_CONTEXT); Phase 7 criteria, Regression: (its exec copy is
  gone, MINOR 0e98d5c7), proof of red, the done line and the test lock all
  run through it. No quote, glob, tilde or variable can rewrite a checked
  word any more. The screen stays and says why: a word that means something
  else in a shell (quote, backslash, $, brace, leading ~) is refused; a glob
  reaches only node --test, which expands its own patterns (sh read
  `tests/.?/` as `tests/../`); no path climbs out with .. or starts at /;
  a word starting with @ is refused (pytest reads @file as more arguments).
- The K6 plan-file sweep has v6.2.0's own Files: reader again (516dffa):
  backticked paths, and plain words only in a field without them. The
  shared reader from round 3 planned directories a description named and
  dropped paths v6.2.0 planned. fieldPaths stays for the tests-only check,
  with a path test on spans (`parse()`, `p.parse()` are no paths), plain
  descriptions ignored when the field has backticked paths, dotfiles,
  backslash paths and glued spans read.
- Skill frontmatter reads a value as YAML does: trailing space is nothing,
  and a comment ends a plain value, a flow list or a block indicator
  (`model: opus # pinned`). A comment that cuts a plain description, or is
  the whole value, is still a hazard.
- release-check reads the diff with --no-renames: a test moved into an
  allowed place after the review shows as removed.
- The example plan's step 2 heading no longer says "must FAIL initially";
  steps 1-2 keep the tests-only warning (operator 2026-10-09, 73262b6).

Open: MINOR c1fef1ad (one shared isMain helper) is not in this round.
Measured: 0 of 463 Files: fields with backticked paths (520 fields in 182
plans across the marketplace repos) carry another path-like word.

Suite 2185 (2183/0/2).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-11 00:38:42 +02:00
0e612c88ac
fix: round 3 of the release review of 6.3.0
Round 3 (v6.2.0..96cb977, BLOCK: 1 BLOCKER, 8 MAJOR, 2 MINOR), each fixed
behind a test that failed first.

- Every allowlisted runner, not only git, takes plain words and a short list
  of options that only read: an option that writes a file or loads code
  (--test-reporter-destination, --outputFile, --junitxml, --basetemp,
  --import, --config, -p, -o, -exec, a reporter path) is on no list; after
  `npm test --` only paths follow; `make test` takes no VAR=value. A built-in
  node test reporter (tap, spec, dot, junit, lcov) stays allowed.
- /trekexecute: a restore the guard refuses (destructive git, in the mode
  that shows no prompts) or the operator declines is never recorded as
  reverted: simplify = "revert-refused" and the run stops before review; a
  refused step revert is reported with its paths.
- stepTestsOnly: a fixture document under tests/ is a test file, "e.g." is
  not a path, ./ is dropped; the plan-file sweep reads Files: with the same
  reader (fieldPaths); the validator hands its parsed fields over.
- plan-validator --steps-from asks for Verify: on a 1.8 plan too.
- skill frontmatter: a value starting with # is a hazard; a quote after an
  escaped backslash closes the value. Routing reads kind tags with hasOwn.
- release-check reads scope_sha_end as written (an all-digit sha keeps its
  leading zero), and Voyage's own artifacts under .claude/projects/ and
  .claude/voyage/ committed after the review do not count as unreviewed.

Suite 2170 (2168/0/2).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-10 23:25:24 +02:00
ed87cc668d
fix: round 2 of the release review of 6.3.0
Round 2 (v6.2.0..0d044f6, BLOCK: 2 BLOCKER, 11 MAJOR, 1 MINOR), each fixed
behind a test that failed first.

- The git runner checks only words /bin/sh passes through unchanged (no
  quote, backslash, $, glob or brace) and refuses --output and its
  abbreviations: round 1's --output refusal was bypassed by quoting.
- fieldPaths: backticked paths are kept as written, parentheses and all; in
  plain text every path-like word counts, and a parenthesised note does not.
- plan-validator --steps-from reads the plan's ## Verification for an
  appended End-to-end step, and warns instead of failing under --soft.
- regression-check prints progress_status, the value progress.json takes;
  /trekexecute copies it.
- release-check: a plugin in a subdirectory is checked in its own directory,
  the suite is not run when a cheaper check already makes the answer exit 2,
  and a bad argument or a crash is exit 2.
- Skill routing looks a skill up among skills only, and builds the corpus
  vectors once.
- /trekexecute Phase 7.2 says plainly that remediation steps in the review
  template's own form stop with a re-plan; making them runnable is a later
  order (operator 2026-10-10).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-10 22:43:38 +02:00